Novel therapeutic regimens in previously untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis

David E. Hinojosa-Gonzalez , Gal Saffati , Gustavo Salgado-Garza , Sagar Patel , Shane Kronstedt , Jeffrey A. Jones , Jennifer M. Taylor , Aihua E. Yen , Jeremy R. Slawin
{"title":"Novel therapeutic regimens in previously untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis","authors":"David E. Hinojosa-Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Gal Saffati ,&nbsp;Gustavo Salgado-Garza ,&nbsp;Sagar Patel ,&nbsp;Shane Kronstedt ,&nbsp;Jeffrey A. Jones ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Taylor ,&nbsp;Aihua E. Yen ,&nbsp;Jeremy R. Slawin","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (muC) has historically had few effective therapeutic options. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), were introduced as therapeutic options for cisplatin-ineligible patients, however, direct head-to-head trials comparing these treatments are lacking. To address this gap, this study employs a Bayesian framework to indirectly compare the performance of ICIs as first-line agents for muC. A systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating different ICI for mUC. Data was inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data was then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200,000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Six studies with 5,449 patients were included, 3,255 received ICI monotherapy or combination. Moreover, a total of 3,006 had PD-L1 positive tumors and 2,362 were PD-L1 negative. Median overall survival (OS) ranged from 12.1 to 31.5 months across the studies, with the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab demonstrating the most substantial reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.47 [95% CrI: 0.38, 0.58]), followed by avelumab monotherapy (HR 0.69 [95% CrI: 0.56, 0.86]). The limitations of this network meta-analysis include variability in study follow-up duration, lack of standardized methods for assessing PD-L1 positivity, and potential bias introduced by control arms with poorer survival outcomes across included trials. The enfortumab vedotin/pembrolizumab combination significantly improved survival and response rates. Avelumab showed notable single-agent activity. These findings provide a valuable framework to guide clinical decision-making and highlight priority areas for future research, including biomarker refinement and novel combination strategies to enhance antitumor immunity in this challenging malignancy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"42 11","pages":"Pages 361-369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924005441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (muC) has historically had few effective therapeutic options. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), were introduced as therapeutic options for cisplatin-ineligible patients, however, direct head-to-head trials comparing these treatments are lacking. To address this gap, this study employs a Bayesian framework to indirectly compare the performance of ICIs as first-line agents for muC. A systematic review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating different ICI for mUC. Data was inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data was then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200,000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Six studies with 5,449 patients were included, 3,255 received ICI monotherapy or combination. Moreover, a total of 3,006 had PD-L1 positive tumors and 2,362 were PD-L1 negative. Median overall survival (OS) ranged from 12.1 to 31.5 months across the studies, with the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab demonstrating the most substantial reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.47 [95% CrI: 0.38, 0.58]), followed by avelumab monotherapy (HR 0.69 [95% CrI: 0.56, 0.86]). The limitations of this network meta-analysis include variability in study follow-up duration, lack of standardized methods for assessing PD-L1 positivity, and potential bias introduced by control arms with poorer survival outcomes across included trials. The enfortumab vedotin/pembrolizumab combination significantly improved survival and response rates. Avelumab showed notable single-agent activity. These findings provide a valuable framework to guide clinical decision-making and highlight priority areas for future research, including biomarker refinement and novel combination strategies to enhance antitumor immunity in this challenging malignancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既往未经治疗的转移性尿路上皮癌的新型治疗方案:系统综述和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
转移性尿路上皮癌(muC)历来很少有有效的治疗方案。最近,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)被引入作为顺铂不合格患者的治疗选择,然而,目前还缺乏直接对比这些治疗方法的头对头试验。为了填补这一空白,本研究采用贝叶斯框架间接比较了ICIs作为muC一线药物的性能。我们进行了一项系统性回顾,以确定评估不同 ICI 治疗 mUC 的随机对照试验。数据被输入Review Manager 5.4进行配对荟萃分析。然后,数据被用于在 R Studio 中构建网络。通过 MonteCarlo 抽样,这些网络被用于对 200,000 个马尔科夫链进行建模。结果以危险比(HR)和 95% 可信区间(CrI)表示。六项研究共纳入了 5,449 名患者,其中 3,255 人接受了 ICI 单药或联合治疗。此外,共有3006例患者的肿瘤PD-L1阳性,2362例患者的肿瘤PD-L1阴性。各项研究的中位总生存期(OS)从12.1个月到31.5个月不等,其中恩福单抗维多汀和pembrolizumab联合治疗的死亡风险降低幅度最大(HR 0.47 [95% CrI: 0.38, 0.58]),其次是阿维单抗单药治疗(HR 0.69 [95% CrI: 0.56, 0.86])。该网络荟萃分析的局限性包括:研究随访时间长短不一、缺乏评估PD-L1阳性的标准化方法,以及纳入试验中生存结果较差的对照臂可能带来的偏倚。恩福单抗维多汀/pembrolizumab联合疗法显著提高了生存率和应答率。阿维单抗显示出明显的单药活性。这些发现为指导临床决策提供了有价值的框架,并突出了未来研究的重点领域,包括生物标记物的完善和新型联合策略,以增强这种具有挑战性的恶性肿瘤的抗肿瘤免疫力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Cover 2 - Masthead 2023 Star Reviewers for Urologic Oncology Cover 3 - Information for Authors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1