Dimensions of clinical leadership among pre-registration nursing students: A cross-sectional study between two countries

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104092
Sue Baron , Keren Grinberg , Joana Pereira Sousa , Hugo Neves , Gerardina Harnett , Monica Bianchi , Marie-Louise Luiking , Stefan Nilsson , Kate Frazer , Kirsten Jack , Janet Scammell , Sigalit Warshawski
{"title":"Dimensions of clinical leadership among pre-registration nursing students: A cross-sectional study between two countries","authors":"Sue Baron ,&nbsp;Keren Grinberg ,&nbsp;Joana Pereira Sousa ,&nbsp;Hugo Neves ,&nbsp;Gerardina Harnett ,&nbsp;Monica Bianchi ,&nbsp;Marie-Louise Luiking ,&nbsp;Stefan Nilsson ,&nbsp;Kate Frazer ,&nbsp;Kirsten Jack ,&nbsp;Janet Scammell ,&nbsp;Sigalit Warshawski","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To explore a) pre-registration students' self-perceptions of clinical leadership behaviours and b) differences in students' self-perceptions of leadership behaviours between two countries (UK and Israel).</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Effective leadership has been associated with high-quality and compassionate care provision in health and social care contexts. This has led to a common acceptance that teaching leadership in nursing education is essential if students are to develop competencies in this area. Worldwide, there is limited research on nursing students' perception of clinical leadership behaviours as well as on the development of leadership behaviours during the study years.</p></div><div><h3>Design and methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey design was used among two convenience samples of UK and Israeli pre-registration nursing students. Closed questionnaires were uploaded in the format of a commercial internet survey provider (Qualtrics.com) and distributed through the virtual learning platforms in the two participating universities. In total 656 students were invited to participate and the response rates were 28.1 % (Israel) and 17.9 % (England).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 140 students completed the questionnaires. Significant differences were found between the two sites in the leadership dimensions \"Emotional Intelligence\" and \"Impact and Influence\" (p &lt; .05), with UK students scoring higher than Israeli students. Among the Israeli sample, significant differences were found in leadership dimensions according to years of study, with higher scores reported in the 3rd and 4th year students compared with the 1st and 2nd Year students in the referred dimensions (p &lt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Differences in students' clinical leadership perception exist between the two cohorts examined. Nurse educators should expand international research on this subject to identify possible antecedents in developing clinical leadership behaviours. At the same time, there is a need to continue efforts to enhance the development of clinical leadership behaviours during all study years through curriculum updating to prepare future nurses better to provide quality, safe and person-centered care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 104092"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147159532400221X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To explore a) pre-registration students' self-perceptions of clinical leadership behaviours and b) differences in students' self-perceptions of leadership behaviours between two countries (UK and Israel).

Background

Effective leadership has been associated with high-quality and compassionate care provision in health and social care contexts. This has led to a common acceptance that teaching leadership in nursing education is essential if students are to develop competencies in this area. Worldwide, there is limited research on nursing students' perception of clinical leadership behaviours as well as on the development of leadership behaviours during the study years.

Design and methods

A cross-sectional survey design was used among two convenience samples of UK and Israeli pre-registration nursing students. Closed questionnaires were uploaded in the format of a commercial internet survey provider (Qualtrics.com) and distributed through the virtual learning platforms in the two participating universities. In total 656 students were invited to participate and the response rates were 28.1 % (Israel) and 17.9 % (England).

Results

Overall, 140 students completed the questionnaires. Significant differences were found between the two sites in the leadership dimensions "Emotional Intelligence" and "Impact and Influence" (p < .05), with UK students scoring higher than Israeli students. Among the Israeli sample, significant differences were found in leadership dimensions according to years of study, with higher scores reported in the 3rd and 4th year students compared with the 1st and 2nd Year students in the referred dimensions (p < .05).

Conclusions

Differences in students' clinical leadership perception exist between the two cohorts examined. Nurse educators should expand international research on this subject to identify possible antecedents in developing clinical leadership behaviours. At the same time, there is a need to continue efforts to enhance the development of clinical leadership behaviours during all study years through curriculum updating to prepare future nurses better to provide quality, safe and person-centered care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注册前护理专业学生的临床领导力维度:两国间的横断面研究。
目的:探讨 a) 注册前学生对临床领导行为的自我认知;b) 两个国家(英国和以色列)学生对领导行为的自我认知差异:背景:在医疗和社会护理领域,有效的领导力与高质量和富有同情心的护理服务息息相关。因此,人们普遍认为,如果要培养学生在这一领域的能力,就必须在护理教育中教授领导力。在世界范围内,有关护理专业学生对临床领导行为的认知以及在学习期间领导行为发展的研究十分有限:对英国和以色列注册前护理专业的学生进行了横断面调查。封闭式问卷以商业互联网调查提供商(Qualtrics.com)的格式上传,并通过两所参与大学的虚拟学习平台分发。共邀请了 656 名学生参与,回复率分别为 28.1%(以色列)和 17.9%(英国):共有 140 名学生完成了问卷调查。两地学生在领导力维度 "情商 "和 "影响力 "方面存在显著差异(p < .05),英国学生的得分高于以色列学生。在以色列的样本中,根据学习年限的不同,学生在领导力维度上存在显著差异,三年级和四年级学生的得分高于一年级和二年级学生(p < .05):结论:接受研究的两届学生在临床领导力认知方面存在差异。护士教育者应扩大这方面的国际研究,以确定培养临床领导行为的可能前因。同时,有必要继续努力,通过更新课程,在所有学习年限内加强临床领导行为的培养,使未来的护士能够更好地提供优质、安全和以人为本的护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of high versus mixed-level fidelity simulation on undergraduate nursing students: A randomised controlled trial Effectiveness of an e-book in enhancing knowledge, coping behaviors and preventive strategies for sexual harassment prevention among new nurses: A randomized controlled study Features influencing surface acting of different clusters of nursing students in vocational college based on interpretable machine learning: A cross-sectional study Impact of a mindful self-compassion workshop incorporating sandtray on burnout in undergraduate nursing students: A mixed methods, pre-post study Professional identity development of advanced practice nurses: Evaluating its integration in curricula and relevance for professional practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1