Closing the gap: prognostic and predictive biomarker validation for personalized care in a Latin American hormone-dependent breast cancer cohort.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Oncologist Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae191
Daniela Alves da Quinta, Darío Rocha, Javier Retamales, Diego Giunta, Nora Artagaveytia, Carlos Velazquez, Adrian Daneri-Navarro, Bettina Müller, Eliana Abdelhay, Alicia I Bravo, Mónica Castro, Cristina Rosales, Elsa Alcoba, Gabriela Acosta Haab, Fernando Carrizo, Irene Sorin, Alejandro Di Sibio, Márcia Marques-Silveira, Renata Binato, Benedicta Caserta, Gonzalo Greif, Alicia Del Toro-Arreola, Antonio Quintero-Ramos, Jorge Gómez, Osvaldo L Podhajcer, Elmer A Fernández, Andrea S Llera
{"title":"Closing the gap: prognostic and predictive biomarker validation for personalized care in a Latin American hormone-dependent breast cancer cohort.","authors":"Daniela Alves da Quinta, Darío Rocha, Javier Retamales, Diego Giunta, Nora Artagaveytia, Carlos Velazquez, Adrian Daneri-Navarro, Bettina Müller, Eliana Abdelhay, Alicia I Bravo, Mónica Castro, Cristina Rosales, Elsa Alcoba, Gabriela Acosta Haab, Fernando Carrizo, Irene Sorin, Alejandro Di Sibio, Márcia Marques-Silveira, Renata Binato, Benedicta Caserta, Gonzalo Greif, Alicia Del Toro-Arreola, Antonio Quintero-Ramos, Jorge Gómez, Osvaldo L Podhajcer, Elmer A Fernández, Andrea S Llera","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyae191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several guidelines recommend the use of different classifiers to determine the risk of recurrence (ROR) and treatment decisions in patients with HR+HER2- breast cancer. However, data are still lacking for their usefulness in Latin American (LA) patients. Our aim was to evaluate the comparative prognostic and predictive performance of different ROR classifiers in a real-world LA cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Molecular Profile of Breast Cancer Study (MPBCS) is an LA case-cohort study with 5-year follow-up. Stages I and II, clinically node-negative HR+HER2- patients (n = 340) who received adjuvant hormone therapy and/or chemotherapy, were analyzed. Time-dependent receiver-operator characteristic-area under the curve, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression (CPHR) models were used to compare the prognostic performance of several risk biomarkers. Multivariate CPHR with interaction models tested the predictive ability of selected risk classifiers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within this cohort, transcriptomic-based classifiers such as the recurrence score (RS), EndoPredict (EP risk and EPClin), and PAM50-risk of recurrence scores (ROR-S and ROR-PC) presented better prognostic performances for node-negative patients (univariate C-index 0.61-0.68, adjusted C-index 0.77-0.80, adjusted hazard ratios [HR] between high and low risk: 4.06-9.97) than the traditional classifiers Ki67 and Nottingham Prognostic Index (univariate C-index 0.53-0.59, adjusted C-index 0.72-0.75, and adjusted HR 1.85-2.54). RS (and to some extent, EndoPredict) also showed predictive capacity for chemotherapy benefit in node-negative patients (interaction P = .0200 and .0510, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, we could prove the clinical validity of most transcriptomic-based risk classifiers and their superiority over clinical and immunohistochemical-based methods in the heterogenous, real-world node-negative HR+HER2- MPBCS cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":"e1701-e1713"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several guidelines recommend the use of different classifiers to determine the risk of recurrence (ROR) and treatment decisions in patients with HR+HER2- breast cancer. However, data are still lacking for their usefulness in Latin American (LA) patients. Our aim was to evaluate the comparative prognostic and predictive performance of different ROR classifiers in a real-world LA cohort.

Methods: The Molecular Profile of Breast Cancer Study (MPBCS) is an LA case-cohort study with 5-year follow-up. Stages I and II, clinically node-negative HR+HER2- patients (n = 340) who received adjuvant hormone therapy and/or chemotherapy, were analyzed. Time-dependent receiver-operator characteristic-area under the curve, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression (CPHR) models were used to compare the prognostic performance of several risk biomarkers. Multivariate CPHR with interaction models tested the predictive ability of selected risk classifiers.

Results: Within this cohort, transcriptomic-based classifiers such as the recurrence score (RS), EndoPredict (EP risk and EPClin), and PAM50-risk of recurrence scores (ROR-S and ROR-PC) presented better prognostic performances for node-negative patients (univariate C-index 0.61-0.68, adjusted C-index 0.77-0.80, adjusted hazard ratios [HR] between high and low risk: 4.06-9.97) than the traditional classifiers Ki67 and Nottingham Prognostic Index (univariate C-index 0.53-0.59, adjusted C-index 0.72-0.75, and adjusted HR 1.85-2.54). RS (and to some extent, EndoPredict) also showed predictive capacity for chemotherapy benefit in node-negative patients (interaction P = .0200 and .0510, respectively).

Conclusion: In summary, we could prove the clinical validity of most transcriptomic-based risk classifiers and their superiority over clinical and immunohistochemical-based methods in the heterogenous, real-world node-negative HR+HER2- MPBCS cohort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩小差距:拉丁美洲激素依赖性乳腺癌队列中个性化治疗的预后和预测生物标志物验证。
背景:一些指南建议使用不同的分类器来确定乳腺癌患者的复发风险(ROR)和治疗决策。然而,在拉丁美洲(LA)患者中使用这些分类器的数据仍然缺乏。我们的目的是在一个真实世界的拉丁美洲队列中评估不同ROR分类器的预后和预测性能比较:乳腺癌分子特征研究(MPBCS)是一项为期 5 年的 LA 病例队列研究。研究分析了接受激素辅助治疗和/或化疗的I期和II期临床结节阴性HR+HER2-患者(n = 340)。采用时间依赖性接收器-操作者特征-曲线下面积、单变量和多变量考克斯比例危险回归(CPHR)模型来比较几种风险生物标志物的预后性能。带有交互模型的多变量 CPHR 检验了选定风险分类指标的预测能力:结果:在该队列中,基于转录组的分类器,如复发评分(RS)、EndoPredict(EP risk和EPClin)和PAM50-复发风险评分(ROR-S和ROR-PC),对结节阴性患者具有更好的预后效果(单变量C指数为0.61-0.68,调整后 C 指数 0.77-0.80,调整后高风险和低风险之间的危险比 [HR]:4.06-9.97)优于传统分类指标 Ki67 和诺丁汉预后指数(单变量 C 指数 0.53-0.59,调整后 C 指数 0.72-0.75,调整后 HR 1.85-2.54)。RS(在一定程度上也包括EndoPredict)还显示了对结节阴性患者化疗获益的预测能力(交互作用P=0.0200和0.0510):总之,我们可以证明大多数基于转录组的风险分类方法的临床有效性,而且在异质性、真实世界的结节阴性HR+HER2- MPBCS队列中,它们优于基于临床和免疫组化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
期刊最新文献
Colorectal cancer harboring EGFR kinase domain duplication response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Predominance of hyperprogression in mucosal melanoma during anti-PD-1 monotherapy treatment. Systemic inflammation and changes in physical well-being in patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal study in community oncology settings. Molecular characterization of metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma in developing countries and its impact on clinical outcomes: LACOG 2018 translational study. Radiotherapy with targeted and immunotherapy improved overall survival and progression-free survival for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1