Assessing the Impact of Defacing Algorithms on Brain Volumetry Accuracy in MRI Analyses.

Dementia and neurocognitive disorders Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-08 DOI:10.12779/dnd.2024.23.3.127
Dong-Woo Ryu, ChungHwee Lee, Hyuk-Je Lee, Yong S Shim, Yun Jeong Hong, Jung Hee Cho, Seonggyu Kim, Jong-Min Lee, Dong Won Yang
{"title":"Assessing the Impact of Defacing Algorithms on Brain Volumetry Accuracy in MRI Analyses.","authors":"Dong-Woo Ryu, ChungHwee Lee, Hyuk-Je Lee, Yong S Shim, Yun Jeong Hong, Jung Hee Cho, Seonggyu Kim, Jong-Min Lee, Dong Won Yang","doi":"10.12779/dnd.2024.23.3.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>To ensure data privacy, the development of defacing processes, which anonymize brain images by obscuring facial features, is crucial. However, the impact of these defacing methods on brain imaging analysis poses significant concern. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of three different defacing methods in automated brain volumetry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging with three-dimensional T1 sequences was performed on ten patients diagnosed with subjective cognitive decline. Defacing was executed using mri_deface, BioImage Suite Web-based defacing, and Defacer. Brain volumes were measured employing the QBraVo program and FreeSurfer, assessing intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the mean differences in brain volume measurements between the original and defaced images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 71.10±6.17 years, with 4 (40.0%) being male. The total intracranial volume, total brain volume, and ventricle volume exhibited high ICCs across the three defacing methods and 2 volumetry analyses. All regional brain volumes showed high ICCs with all three defacing methods. Despite variations among some brain regions, no significant mean differences in regional brain volume were observed between the original and defaced images across all regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The three defacing algorithms evaluated did not significantly affect the results of image analysis for the entire brain or specific cerebral regions. These findings suggest that these algorithms can serve as robust methods for defacing in neuroimaging analysis, thereby supporting data anonymization without compromising the integrity of brain volume measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":72779,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2024.23.3.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: To ensure data privacy, the development of defacing processes, which anonymize brain images by obscuring facial features, is crucial. However, the impact of these defacing methods on brain imaging analysis poses significant concern. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of three different defacing methods in automated brain volumetry.

Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging with three-dimensional T1 sequences was performed on ten patients diagnosed with subjective cognitive decline. Defacing was executed using mri_deface, BioImage Suite Web-based defacing, and Defacer. Brain volumes were measured employing the QBraVo program and FreeSurfer, assessing intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the mean differences in brain volume measurements between the original and defaced images.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 71.10±6.17 years, with 4 (40.0%) being male. The total intracranial volume, total brain volume, and ventricle volume exhibited high ICCs across the three defacing methods and 2 volumetry analyses. All regional brain volumes showed high ICCs with all three defacing methods. Despite variations among some brain regions, no significant mean differences in regional brain volume were observed between the original and defaced images across all regions.

Conclusions: The three defacing algorithms evaluated did not significantly affect the results of image analysis for the entire brain or specific cerebral regions. These findings suggest that these algorithms can serve as robust methods for defacing in neuroimaging analysis, thereby supporting data anonymization without compromising the integrity of brain volume measurements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估磁共振成像分析中的去污算法对脑容量测量准确性的影响
背景和目的:为确保数据隐私,开发 "篡改程序 "至关重要。"篡改程序 "可通过模糊面部特征来匿名大脑图像。然而,这些篡改方法对大脑成像分析的影响令人十分担忧。本研究旨在评估三种不同去污方法在自动脑容积测量中的可靠性:方法:对 10 名被诊断为主观认知能力下降的患者进行了三维 T1 序列磁共振成像。使用 mri_deface、BioImage Suite 基于网络的deface 和 Defacer 进行了剔除。使用 QBraVo 程序和 FreeSurfer 测量脑容量,评估原始图像和去污图像之间的类内相关系数(ICC)和脑容量测量的平均差异:患者的平均年龄为(71.10±6.17)岁,其中男性 4 人,占 40.0%。颅内总容积、大脑总容积和脑室容积在三种去污方法和两种容积测量分析中均显示出较高的 ICC。所有区域的脑容量在三种去污方法中都显示出较高的 ICC。尽管某些脑区之间存在差异,但在所有区域中,原始图像和去污图像之间的区域脑容量均值差异并不明显:结论:评估的三种去污算法对整个大脑或特定脑区的图像分析结果没有明显影响。这些研究结果表明,这些算法可以作为神经成像分析中进行去污的稳健方法,从而支持数据匿名化,而不会损害脑容量测量的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Item Characteristics and Test Information Between the K-MMSE~2:SV and K-MMSE. Assessing the Impact of Defacing Algorithms on Brain Volumetry Accuracy in MRI Analyses. Discriminative Power of Seoul Cognitive Status Test in Differentiating Subjective Cognitive Decline, Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Dementia Based on CERAD-K Standards. Shunt-Responsive Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patient With Parkinson's Disease-Compatible Findings on Dopamine Transporter Scans. Speech Emotion Recognition in People at High Risk of Dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1