Efficacy of plant-based products and nonconventional pesticides for the management of tropical bed bug.

Dita Meisyara, Ikhsan Guswenrivo, G Veera Singham
{"title":"Efficacy of plant-based products and nonconventional pesticides for the management of tropical bed bug.","authors":"Dita Meisyara, Ikhsan Guswenrivo, G Veera Singham","doi":"10.1093/jee/toae179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insecticide resistance is widespread in global bed bug populations. Both common bed bugs and tropical bed bugs are pyrethroid-resistant among most field populations. Plant-based products and nonconventional pesticides offer minimal-risk strategies for managing bed bug resistance, but this strategy has yet to be formally evaluated in Cimex hemipterus (F.) (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Here, several commercial plant-based formulations (Cedarcide, EcoRaider (also known as EcoVenger), EcoSMART, and Bio-D), a novel product, Provecta, and a pyrethroid insecticide, Pesguard FG161 were tested against pyrethroid-susceptible and resistant strains of C. hemipterus using direct spray, residual exposure, and egg dipping assays. Direct spray treatments outperform residual applications against all tested bed bug strains. Cedarcide exhibits the highest consistency in eliminating bed bugs, followed by EcoRaider, EcoSMART, and Provecta that outperform Bio-D and Pesguard FG161. In comparison to Pesguard FG161, all plant-based insecticide products and Provecta showed higher efficacy against pyrethroid-resistant strains. Although effective, product efficacy varies in terms of speed. Cedarcide kills all bed bugs within 1 min after spraying; however, other products can take up to 9 days to achieve 100% mortality. The efficacy of all products was reduced when evaluated on fabric surface (42%-65% mortality). Cedarcide and EcoRaider reduced egg hatchability by 37%-73% and 47%-70%, respectively. This study suggests that certain plant-based insecticides and an unconventional insecticide can serve as alternative direct spray treatments for managing tropical bed bugs, though their residual effects are limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":94077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic entomology","volume":" ","pages":"2070-2080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toae179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insecticide resistance is widespread in global bed bug populations. Both common bed bugs and tropical bed bugs are pyrethroid-resistant among most field populations. Plant-based products and nonconventional pesticides offer minimal-risk strategies for managing bed bug resistance, but this strategy has yet to be formally evaluated in Cimex hemipterus (F.) (Hemiptera: Cimicidae). Here, several commercial plant-based formulations (Cedarcide, EcoRaider (also known as EcoVenger), EcoSMART, and Bio-D), a novel product, Provecta, and a pyrethroid insecticide, Pesguard FG161 were tested against pyrethroid-susceptible and resistant strains of C. hemipterus using direct spray, residual exposure, and egg dipping assays. Direct spray treatments outperform residual applications against all tested bed bug strains. Cedarcide exhibits the highest consistency in eliminating bed bugs, followed by EcoRaider, EcoSMART, and Provecta that outperform Bio-D and Pesguard FG161. In comparison to Pesguard FG161, all plant-based insecticide products and Provecta showed higher efficacy against pyrethroid-resistant strains. Although effective, product efficacy varies in terms of speed. Cedarcide kills all bed bugs within 1 min after spraying; however, other products can take up to 9 days to achieve 100% mortality. The efficacy of all products was reduced when evaluated on fabric surface (42%-65% mortality). Cedarcide and EcoRaider reduced egg hatchability by 37%-73% and 47%-70%, respectively. This study suggests that certain plant-based insecticides and an unconventional insecticide can serve as alternative direct spray treatments for managing tropical bed bugs, though their residual effects are limited.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以植物为基础的产品和非常规杀虫剂在防治热带臭虫方面的功效。
杀虫剂抗药性在全球臭虫种群中普遍存在。在大多数野外种群中,普通臭虫和热带臭虫都对除虫菊酯具有抗药性。以植物为基础的产品和非传统杀虫剂为管理臭虫抗药性提供了最低风险的策略,但这种策略尚未在 Cimex hemipterus (F.)(半翅目:Cimicidae)中得到正式评估。在此,我们采用直接喷雾、残留暴露和浸卵试验等方法,对几种商用植物制剂(Cedarcide、EcoRaider(又称 EcoVenger)、EcoSMART 和 Bio-D)、一种新型产品 Provecta 和一种拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂 Pesguard FG161 进行了测试,以对抗对拟除虫菊酯有敏感性和抗性的半翅虫菌株。对所有测试的臭虫菌株,直接喷洒处理的效果都优于残留喷洒。Cedarcide 在消灭臭虫方面表现出最高的一致性,其次是 EcoRaider、EcoSMART 和 Provecta,它们都优于 Bio-D 和 Pesguard FG161。与 Pesguard FG161 相比,所有植物杀虫剂产品和 Provecta 对抗除虫菊酯菌株的效力都更高。尽管产品有效,但在杀虫速度方面却存在差异。Cedarcide 可在喷洒后 1 分钟内杀死所有臭虫;但其他产品则需要长达 9 天的时间才能达到 100% 的死亡率。在对织物表面进行评估时,所有产品的功效都有所下降(死亡率为 42%-65% )。Cedarcide 和 EcoRaider 可使虫卵孵化率分别降低 37%-73% 和 47%-70%。这项研究表明,某些植物杀虫剂和一种非常规杀虫剂可以作为替代直接喷洒处理剂来管理热带臭虫,尽管它们的残留效果有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diets supplemented with different solvents extracts of Lepista nuda alters longevity and fecundity, and the expression of related genes in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Diversity and role of volatile terpene and terpenoid pheromones in insects. Correction to: Electroantennographic and behavioral responses of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) adults to the volatiles of plum fruits. Challenges in baiting to manage fungus-growing termite colonies. Development of practical pheromone lures for Lygus hesperus and Lygus elisus (Heteroptera: Miridae).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1