Can you know before you go? Information about disability accommodations on US hospital websites.

Allison Kannam, Carol Haywood, Megan A Morris, Lynn Huang, Tracey Singer, Gurasees Bajaj, Aijalon Muhammad, Tara Lagu
{"title":"Can you know before you go? Information about disability accommodations on US hospital websites.","authors":"Allison Kannam, Carol Haywood, Megan A Morris, Lynn Huang, Tracey Singer, Gurasees Bajaj, Aijalon Muhammad, Tara Lagu","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with disability (PWD) face challenges accessing healthcare. Websites are a public-facing resource that can help PWD determine if a hospital can accommodate their needs, yet few studies have described whether hospital websites contain adequate accommodation information.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the extent to which information about disability accommodations is available on US hospital websites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We manually reviewed hospital websites using a structured extraction form. We used the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital General Information Data set to identify a stratified random sample of 600 nonspecialty hospitals in the United States. We excluded hospitals that shared a website with a previously reviewed hospital for a final sample of 445. We recorded (1) content about specific disability accommodations (in 11 predetermined categories); (2) descriptions of hospital policy mentioning disability; and (3) the point of contact to obtain more information about accommodations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About two-thirds (65.6%) of sampled hospitals were acute care hospitals (vs 34.4% critical access); 53.5% had 26-299 beds. Overall, 73.7% websites had information about accommodations; of these, 36.3% had information solely within hospital policies. Of the 47.0% websites with accommodation information beyond hospital policies, the mean number of accommodations listed (excluding policy statements) was 2.37 (of 11 possible). Hospitals with 300+ beds had higher odds of listing any nonpolicy accommodations than those with 1-26 beds (odds ratio = 2.768, p = .02). Less than half (40.5%) hospitals listed a contact person.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Information about disability accommodations is sparse on hospital websites. Comprehensive and actionable communication about accommodations is needed to better protect PWD's rights to accessible healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with disability (PWD) face challenges accessing healthcare. Websites are a public-facing resource that can help PWD determine if a hospital can accommodate their needs, yet few studies have described whether hospital websites contain adequate accommodation information.

Objective: To characterize the extent to which information about disability accommodations is available on US hospital websites.

Methods: We manually reviewed hospital websites using a structured extraction form. We used the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital General Information Data set to identify a stratified random sample of 600 nonspecialty hospitals in the United States. We excluded hospitals that shared a website with a previously reviewed hospital for a final sample of 445. We recorded (1) content about specific disability accommodations (in 11 predetermined categories); (2) descriptions of hospital policy mentioning disability; and (3) the point of contact to obtain more information about accommodations.

Results: About two-thirds (65.6%) of sampled hospitals were acute care hospitals (vs 34.4% critical access); 53.5% had 26-299 beds. Overall, 73.7% websites had information about accommodations; of these, 36.3% had information solely within hospital policies. Of the 47.0% websites with accommodation information beyond hospital policies, the mean number of accommodations listed (excluding policy statements) was 2.37 (of 11 possible). Hospitals with 300+ beds had higher odds of listing any nonpolicy accommodations than those with 1-26 beds (odds ratio = 2.768, p = .02). Less than half (40.5%) hospitals listed a contact person.

Conclusions: Information about disability accommodations is sparse on hospital websites. Comprehensive and actionable communication about accommodations is needed to better protect PWD's rights to accessible healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
您能在出发前了解情况吗?美国医院网站上有关残障人士便利设施的信息。
背景:残疾人(PWD)在获得医疗保健服务方面面临挑战。网站是一种面向公众的资源,可以帮助残疾人确定医院是否能满足他们的需求,但很少有研究描述医院网站是否包含足够的便利信息:目的:描述美国医院网站上提供的残疾人便利信息的程度:方法:我们使用结构化提取表人工审核了医院网站。我们使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医院一般信息数据集,对美国 600 家非专科医院进行了分层随机抽样。我们排除了与之前审查过的医院共享网站的医院,最终样本为 445 家。我们记录了:(1) 有关具体残疾便利措施的内容(11 个预先确定的类别);(2) 提及残疾问题的医院政策描述;以及 (3) 获取更多有关便利措施信息的联系点:约三分之二(65.6%)的抽样医院为急症护理医院(34.4% 为重症护理医院);53.5% 的医院拥有 26-299 张病床。总体而言,73.7%的网站有关于住宿的信息;其中 36.3%的网站仅在医院政策中提供信息。47.0%的网站提供了医院政策以外的住宿信息,其中列出的住宿(不包括政策声明)的平均数量为 2.37(可能有 11 种)。与拥有 1-26 张病床的医院相比,拥有 300 张以上病床的医院有更高的几率列出任何非政策范围内的便利信息(几率比 = 2.768,p = .02)。不到一半(40.5%)的医院列出了联系人:结论:医院网站上有关残障人士便利措施的信息很少。为了更好地保护残疾人获得无障碍医疗服务的权利,需要对相关便利措施进行全面、可操作的宣传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Airway clearance in hospitalized children with neurological impairment: Does it work? Employing EHR usage data to improve care requires clinician engagement and trust. Assessing the impact of workload and clinician experience on patient throughput: A multicenter study. Guideline concordance of electronic health record order sets for hospital-based treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Methodological progress note: Purposeful sampling in qualitative research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1