Midwifery Students' Experiences of Bias in the Clinical Setting: Prevalence, Types, and Impact.

Heidi Loomis, Barbara Hackley, Paula Alexander-Delpech, Emily McGahey, Dana Perlman
{"title":"Midwifery Students' Experiences of Bias in the Clinical Setting: Prevalence, Types, and Impact.","authors":"Heidi Loomis, Barbara Hackley, Paula Alexander-Delpech, Emily McGahey, Dana Perlman","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exposure to bias in clinical learning environments may undermine students' confidence, cause emotional harm, impede learning, and potentially delay graduation. However, little is known about the prevalence of bias experienced by midwifery students in the United States. This cross-sectional, descriptive study aimed to quantify clinical midwifery students' experiences of bias based on 7 self-identified characteristics (gender identity, race or ethnicity, body size, age, sexual orientation, religion, and occupational background). Additionally, this research explored the impact of bias on student well-being, learning, and professional commitment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey consisted of 39 items addressing (1) prevalence and types of bias, (2) emotional impact and influence on clinical learning, (3) ways students coped, (4) whether anyone spoke up at the time bias occurred, (5) whether students reported bias to faculty, and (6) impact of bias on commitment to midwifery. The survey was distributed to midwifery students and recent graduates in 2022 via American College of Nurse-Midwives email discussion lists and social media. Participants were eligible if they were in a clinical rotation in an Accreditation Commission for Midwifery Education-accredited midwifery program between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys were returned by 383 participants, with 301 meeting inclusion criteria. Most participants (66.5%) reported personally experiencing or witnessing bias against at least 1 of 7 personal characteristics. The most commonly reported biases were related to gender, occupational background, age, and race or ethnicity. Only half of the participants reported these occurrences to someone with academic authority, and nearly a third considered withdrawing from their educational programs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this study bias was common and significantly impacted students. These results underscore the need for creative and bold interventions at personal, educational, and institutional levels to prevent and mitigate bias. Safeguarding clinical learning environments will enable students to thrive, graduate with confidence and competence, and thereby contribute to the diversification and strengthening of the midwifery profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Exposure to bias in clinical learning environments may undermine students' confidence, cause emotional harm, impede learning, and potentially delay graduation. However, little is known about the prevalence of bias experienced by midwifery students in the United States. This cross-sectional, descriptive study aimed to quantify clinical midwifery students' experiences of bias based on 7 self-identified characteristics (gender identity, race or ethnicity, body size, age, sexual orientation, religion, and occupational background). Additionally, this research explored the impact of bias on student well-being, learning, and professional commitment.

Methods: The survey consisted of 39 items addressing (1) prevalence and types of bias, (2) emotional impact and influence on clinical learning, (3) ways students coped, (4) whether anyone spoke up at the time bias occurred, (5) whether students reported bias to faculty, and (6) impact of bias on commitment to midwifery. The survey was distributed to midwifery students and recent graduates in 2022 via American College of Nurse-Midwives email discussion lists and social media. Participants were eligible if they were in a clinical rotation in an Accreditation Commission for Midwifery Education-accredited midwifery program between 2019 and 2022.

Results: Surveys were returned by 383 participants, with 301 meeting inclusion criteria. Most participants (66.5%) reported personally experiencing or witnessing bias against at least 1 of 7 personal characteristics. The most commonly reported biases were related to gender, occupational background, age, and race or ethnicity. Only half of the participants reported these occurrences to someone with academic authority, and nearly a third considered withdrawing from their educational programs.

Discussion: In this study bias was common and significantly impacted students. These results underscore the need for creative and bold interventions at personal, educational, and institutional levels to prevent and mitigate bias. Safeguarding clinical learning environments will enable students to thrive, graduate with confidence and competence, and thereby contribute to the diversification and strengthening of the midwifery profession.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产士学生在临床环境中的偏见经历:普遍性、类型和影响。
导言:在临床学习环境中暴露于偏见可能会打击学生的信心、造成情感伤害、阻碍学习并可能延迟毕业。然而,人们对美国助产士学生遭遇偏见的普遍程度知之甚少。这项横断面描述性研究旨在量化临床助产学生基于 7 个自我认同特征(性别认同、种族或民族、体型、年龄、性取向、宗教和职业背景)的偏见经历。此外,这项研究还探讨了偏见对学生福祉、学习和职业承诺的影响:调查包括 39 个项目,涉及:(1)偏见的普遍性和类型;(2)对临床学习的情绪影响和冲击;(3)学生的应对方式;(4)发生偏见时是否有人说出来;(5)学生是否向教师报告偏见;(6)偏见对助产承诺的影响。该调查通过美国助产士学院电子邮件讨论列表和社交媒体分发给 2022 年的助产士学生和应届毕业生。如果参与者在 2019 年至 2022 年期间在助产士教育认证委员会认证的助产士课程中进行临床轮转,则有资格参与调查:383 名参与者交回了调查问卷,其中 301 人符合纳入标准。大多数参与者(66.5%)表示曾亲身经历或目睹过针对 7 种个人特征中至少一种特征的偏见。最常报告的偏见与性别、职业背景、年龄、种族或民族有关。只有一半的参与者向学术权威报告了这些情况,近三分之一的参与者考虑退出他们的教育项目:讨论:在这项研究中,偏见很常见,对学生的影响很大。这些结果表明,有必要在个人、教育和机构层面采取创造性和大胆的干预措施,以防止和减轻偏见。保障临床学习环境将使学生茁壮成长,在毕业时充满信心和能力,从而为助产士职业的多样化和加强做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adapting Group Prenatal Care for Telehealth: A COVID-Era Innovation to Address Barriers to Care for Latinx Clients. Acute Cystitis in a Transfeminine Patient: Assessment and Treatment of Urinary Tract Symptoms. Implementing Best Practice When Screening Birthing People for a Substance Use Disorder. Societal Discrimination, Vigilance, and Patient-Provider Relationships Among Perinatal Women: A Mixed Methods Study. Music and Sleep Hygiene Interventions for Pregnancy-Related Insomnia: An Online Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1