Monomer Elution of Additive and Subtractive Manufactured Resins for Permanent Restorations.

Samet Atasoy, Sultan Aktuğ Karademir
{"title":"Monomer Elution of Additive and Subtractive Manufactured Resins for Permanent Restorations.","authors":"Samet Atasoy, Sultan Aktuğ Karademir","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose: To evaluate the elution of residual monomers from resins used in additive and subtractive manufactured permanent restorations over a period of one month, using highperformance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Materials and Methods: Two additive manufacturing permanent crown resins (Crowntec, CT and VarseoSmile Crown Plus, VS) and a subtractive manufacturing resin nanoceramic (Cerasmart, CS) were used to fabricate 30 disc-shaped samples (10 × 2 mm) (n=10). The elution of bisphenol A ethoxylate dimethacrylate (BisEMA), urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA), and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) monomers was measured with HPLC at 1 day and 30 days after immersion. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey tests were used to evaluate differences in eluted monomer concentrations. Paired-sample t tests were used to test the differences in monomer concentration between storage times. Results: CS released BisEMA and UDMA residual monomers, while VS and CT released BisEMA and TEGDMA residual monomers. The residual monomer elution from CT was consistently lower than that from VS for both BisEMA (p <0.001) and TEGDMA (p <0.001). CS showed a decreasing release pattern in BisEMA (p =0.002) and UDMA (p <0.001) residuel monomers, whereas VS and CT showed an increasing release pattern in BisEMA (p <0.001) and TEGDMA (p <0.001) residuel monomers. Conclusions: The additive manufactured composite resins released higher amounts of residual monomers than the subtractive manufactured resin nanoceramic. Although the amounts of residual monomers released in the additive manufactured composite resins increased over time in contrast to subtractive manufactured resin nanoceramic, these values were below cytotoxic levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the elution of residual monomers from resins used in additive and subtractive manufactured permanent restorations over a period of one month, using highperformance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Materials and Methods: Two additive manufacturing permanent crown resins (Crowntec, CT and VarseoSmile Crown Plus, VS) and a subtractive manufacturing resin nanoceramic (Cerasmart, CS) were used to fabricate 30 disc-shaped samples (10 × 2 mm) (n=10). The elution of bisphenol A ethoxylate dimethacrylate (BisEMA), urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA), and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) monomers was measured with HPLC at 1 day and 30 days after immersion. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey tests were used to evaluate differences in eluted monomer concentrations. Paired-sample t tests were used to test the differences in monomer concentration between storage times. Results: CS released BisEMA and UDMA residual monomers, while VS and CT released BisEMA and TEGDMA residual monomers. The residual monomer elution from CT was consistently lower than that from VS for both BisEMA (p <0.001) and TEGDMA (p <0.001). CS showed a decreasing release pattern in BisEMA (p =0.002) and UDMA (p <0.001) residuel monomers, whereas VS and CT showed an increasing release pattern in BisEMA (p <0.001) and TEGDMA (p <0.001) residuel monomers. Conclusions: The additive manufactured composite resins released higher amounts of residual monomers than the subtractive manufactured resin nanoceramic. Although the amounts of residual monomers released in the additive manufactured composite resins increased over time in contrast to subtractive manufactured resin nanoceramic, these values were below cytotoxic levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于永久修复的添加型和减量型人造树脂的单体洗脱。
目的:使用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)评估一个月内添加型和减量型永久性修复体所用树脂中残留单体的洗脱情况。材料与方法:使用两种添加型永久性牙冠树脂(Crowntec,CT 和 VarseoSmile Crown Plus,VS)和一种减量型树脂纳米陶瓷(Cerasmart,CS)制作 30 个圆盘状样品(10 × 2 毫米)(n=10)。浸泡 1 天和 30 天后,用 HPLC 测量双酚 A 聚氧乙烯醚二甲基丙烯酸酯(BisEMA)、聚氨酯二甲基丙烯酸酯(UDMA)和三乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(TEGDMA)单体的洗脱情况。采用单因素方差分析 (ANOVA) 和事后 Tukey 检验来评估洗脱单体浓度的差异。使用配对样本 t 检验来检验不同储存时间的单体浓度差异。结果CS 释放了 BisEMA 和 UDMA 残余单体,而 VS 和 CT 释放了 BisEMA 和 TEGDMA 残余单体。就 BisEMA 和 UDMA 而言,CT 的残余单体洗脱量始终低于 VS 的残余单体洗脱量(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IN VITRO SURVIVAL AND FRACTURE FORCE OF LITHIUM DISILICATE HYBRID ABUTMENT CROWNS. Influence of Implant ScanBody Material and Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions. A Cross-Sectional Study of Temporomandibular Disorders Among Postgraduate Students. Translucency Parameters and Masking Abilities of Monolithic CAD/CAM Ceramics. A Comparison of Occlusal Schemes with Condylar Inclination and Anterior Guidance in Dentate Individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1