A local review of section 17 leave forms in conjunction with the Mental Health Act Code of Practice: recommendations for future practice.

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1192/bjb.2024.54
Shayanthan Pathmanathan, Georgina Edgerley Harris, Giles Townsend
{"title":"A local review of section 17 leave forms in conjunction with the Mental Health Act Code of Practice: recommendations for future practice.","authors":"Shayanthan Pathmanathan, Georgina Edgerley Harris, Giles Townsend","doi":"10.1192/bjb.2024.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and method: </strong>The aim of this project was to set out recommendations for the section 17 leave form to reflect guidance provided in the Mental Health Act 1983: Code of Practice, following local Care Quality Commission feedback. We reviewed guidance in the Code and publicly available leave forms to identify items to include in the leave form. Then, we determined which publicly available leave forms included each item and reviewed whether the item should be included in the leave form and whether any reformulation was needed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the method described, we identified a list of items that should be included in the leave form. When comparing the leave forms of different trusts, there was considerable variation with respect to which items were included in each form.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>We provide some recommendations for future practice regarding section 17 leave forms to facilitate consistency with the Code and between different trusts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8883,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2024.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and method: The aim of this project was to set out recommendations for the section 17 leave form to reflect guidance provided in the Mental Health Act 1983: Code of Practice, following local Care Quality Commission feedback. We reviewed guidance in the Code and publicly available leave forms to identify items to include in the leave form. Then, we determined which publicly available leave forms included each item and reviewed whether the item should be included in the leave form and whether any reformulation was needed.

Results: Using the method described, we identified a list of items that should be included in the leave form. When comparing the leave forms of different trusts, there was considerable variation with respect to which items were included in each form.

Clinical implications: We provide some recommendations for future practice regarding section 17 leave forms to facilitate consistency with the Code and between different trusts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合《精神健康法实施细则》对第 17 条休假表格进行地方审查:对未来做法的建议。
目的和方法:该项目的目的是根据当地护理质量委员会的反馈意见,就第 17 条休假表提出建议,以反映 1983 年《精神健康法》中的指导原则:根据当地护理质量委员会的反馈意见,我们对《1983 年精神健康法:实务守则》中的指导提出了建议。我们审查了《守则》中的指南和公开的请假表,以确定请假表中应包括的项目。然后,我们确定了哪些公开的请假单包含了每个项目,并审查了该项目是否应包含在请假单中,以及是否需要重新制定:通过上述方法,我们确定了应列入请假单的项目清单。在比较不同托管机构的请假单时,各托管机构在请假单中包含的项目存在很大差异:临床意义:我们就第 17 条休假表格的未来实践提出了一些建议,以促进与《准则》和不同托管机构之间的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Bulletin
BJPsych Bulletin PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BJPsych Bulletin prioritises research, opinion and informed reflection on the state of psychiatry, management of psychiatric services, and education and training in psychiatry. It provides essential reading and practical value to psychiatrists and anyone involved in the management and provision of mental healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Why regulation hurts: balancing the need to maintain standards with the mental health impact on public sector professionals. Workplace bullying of psychiatric trainees: systematic review. Determining unmet need: clinical relevance of suspected neurodivergence in first-episode psychosis. Barriers to accessing perinatal mental health services and suggestions for improvement: qualitative study of women of Black and south Asian backgrounds. Clinical characteristics and suicidal ideation as predictors of suicide: prospective study of 1000 referrals to general adult psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1