Sex Disparities in Opioid Prescription and Administration on a Hospital Medicine Service.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08814-7
Nancy Yang, Margaret C Fang, Aksharananda Rambachan
{"title":"Sex Disparities in Opioid Prescription and Administration on a Hospital Medicine Service.","authors":"Nancy Yang, Margaret C Fang, Aksharananda Rambachan","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-08814-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Decisions to prescribe opioids to patients depend on many factors, including illness severity, pain assessment, and patient age, race, ethnicity, and gender. Gender and sex disparities have been documented in many healthcare settings, but are understudied in inpatient general medicine hospital settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assessed for differences in opioid administration and prescription patterns by legal sex in adult patient hospitalizations from the general medicine service at a large urban academic center.</p><p><strong>Designs, setting, and participants: </strong>This study included all adult patient hospitalizations discharged from the acute care inpatient general medicine services at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Helen Diller Medical Center at Parnassus Heights from 1/1/2013 to 9/30/2021.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were (1) average daily inpatient opioids received and (2) days of opioids prescribed on discharge. For both outcomes, we first performed logistic regression to assess differences in whether or not any opioids were administered or prescribed. Then, we performed negative binomial regression to assess differences in the amount of opioids given. We also performed all analyses on a subgroup of hospitalizations with pain-related diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study cohort included 48,745 hospitalizations involving 27,777 patients. Of these, 24,398 (50.1%) hospitalizations were female patients and 24,347 (49.9%) were male. Controlling for demographic, clinical, and hospitalization-level variables, female patients were less likely to receive inpatient opioids compared to male patents (adjusted OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.82, 0.92) and received 27.5 fewer morphine milligram equivalents per day on average (95% CI - 39.0, - 16.0). When considering discharge opioids, no significant differences were found between sexes. In the subgroup analysis of pain-related diagnoses, female patients received fewer inpatient opioids.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Female patients were less likely to receive inpatient opioids and received fewer opioids when prescribed. Future work to promote equity should identify strategies to ensure all patients receive adequate pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2679-2688"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08814-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Decisions to prescribe opioids to patients depend on many factors, including illness severity, pain assessment, and patient age, race, ethnicity, and gender. Gender and sex disparities have been documented in many healthcare settings, but are understudied in inpatient general medicine hospital settings.

Objective: We assessed for differences in opioid administration and prescription patterns by legal sex in adult patient hospitalizations from the general medicine service at a large urban academic center.

Designs, setting, and participants: This study included all adult patient hospitalizations discharged from the acute care inpatient general medicine services at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Helen Diller Medical Center at Parnassus Heights from 1/1/2013 to 9/30/2021.

Main outcome and measures: The primary outcomes were (1) average daily inpatient opioids received and (2) days of opioids prescribed on discharge. For both outcomes, we first performed logistic regression to assess differences in whether or not any opioids were administered or prescribed. Then, we performed negative binomial regression to assess differences in the amount of opioids given. We also performed all analyses on a subgroup of hospitalizations with pain-related diagnoses.

Results: Our study cohort included 48,745 hospitalizations involving 27,777 patients. Of these, 24,398 (50.1%) hospitalizations were female patients and 24,347 (49.9%) were male. Controlling for demographic, clinical, and hospitalization-level variables, female patients were less likely to receive inpatient opioids compared to male patents (adjusted OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.82, 0.92) and received 27.5 fewer morphine milligram equivalents per day on average (95% CI - 39.0, - 16.0). When considering discharge opioids, no significant differences were found between sexes. In the subgroup analysis of pain-related diagnoses, female patients received fewer inpatient opioids.

Conclusions: Female patients were less likely to receive inpatient opioids and received fewer opioids when prescribed. Future work to promote equity should identify strategies to ensure all patients receive adequate pain management.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院内科阿片类药物处方和用药的性别差异。
导言:给患者开阿片类药物的决定取决于很多因素,包括病情严重程度、疼痛评估、患者年龄、种族、民族和性别。性别和性别差异在许多医疗机构中都有记录,但在综合医院的住院病人中却鲜有研究:我们评估了一家大型城市学术中心普通内科住院成人患者的阿片类药物用药和处方模式在法定性别上的差异:本研究包括加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校(UCSF)帕纳萨斯高地海伦-迪勒医疗中心(Helen Diller Medical Center at Parnassus Heights)2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 30 日期间急诊住院普通内科病人出院的所有成人患者:主要结果是:(1)住院病人平均每天接受的阿片类药物;(2)出院时开具的阿片类药物天数。对于这两项结果,我们首先进行了逻辑回归,以评估是否施用或开具阿片类药物的差异。然后,我们进行了负二项回归,以评估阿片类药物用量的差异。我们还对疼痛相关诊断的住院病人分组进行了所有分析:我们的研究队列包括 48,745 次住院治疗,涉及 27,777 名患者。其中,24,398 例(50.1%)住院患者为女性,24,347 例(49.9%)住院患者为男性。在控制了人口统计学、临床和住院层面的变量后,与男性患者相比,女性患者接受住院阿片类药物的可能性较低(调整后 OR 为 0.87;95% CI 为 0.82,0.92),平均每天接受的吗啡毫克当量减少 27.5(95% CI - 39.0,- 16.0)。在考虑出院阿片类药物时,没有发现性别间的显著差异。在疼痛相关诊断的分组分析中,女性患者住院时接受的阿片类药物较少:结论:女性患者接受住院阿片类药物治疗的可能性较低,开出的阿片类药物也较少。未来促进公平的工作应确定策略,确保所有患者都能得到适当的疼痛治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Identifying Demographic Trends in the Use of Audio-Video and Audio-Only Telehealth by Arizona Medicaid Beneficiaries Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Private Equity Penetration in Behavioral Health in the United States, 2010-2022. Approach to Estimating Adherence to Heart Failure Medications Using Linked Electronic Health Record and Pharmacy Data. National Survey of Factors Associated with Physician Antibiotic Prescribing Preferences. Antipsychotics and Risk of Acute Respiratory Failure in U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1