Understanding sex differences in extinction retention: Pre-extinction stress and sex hormone status

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Psychoneuroendocrinology Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107161
{"title":"Understanding sex differences in extinction retention: Pre-extinction stress and sex hormone status","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Difficulties in fear regulation can sometimes result in maladaptive fear responses. To better understand how to improve fear regulation, it is important to determine how known factors, such as sex hormone status and stress, might interact to influence fear memory. Research has shown that women with high estradiol levels (mid-cycle) and men exhibit better extinction retention compared to women with low estradiol levels (women in the early follicular cycle or using oral contraceptives). Stress has also been demonstrated to affect both the learning and retention of extinction. Despite documented interactions between stress and sex hormones, their combined effects have not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to examine the impact of stress as a function of sex hormone status on extinction learning and retention.</p><p>A total of 168 non-clinical participants were studied, including men (n = 46), women using oral contraceptives (n = 38), women in the early follicular phase (n = 40), and women in mid-cycle (n = 44). On Day 1, fear acquisition training was performed. On day 2, prior to extinction training, half of the participants were exposed to a psychosocial stressor, while the other half performed a non-stressful control task. On day 3, extinction retention was tested. Fear was quantified using skin conductance responses, while stress hormones were quantified through saliva samples.</p><p>Exposure to stress prior to extinction training did not affect extinction learning, regardless of sex hormone status. In contrast, pre-extinction stress exposure had different effects on extinction retention depending on hormone status. Stressed men showed impairment in extinction retention compared to controls, while the experimental condition had no effect on naturally cycling women. Regardless of stress exposure, early follicular women exhibited a deficit in fear regulation, while mid-cycle women showed effective fear regulation. Among women using oral contraceptives, the stress group demonstrated better extinction retention compared to the control group.</p><p>These results demonstrate the importance of considering sex hormone status and stress exposure during extinction learning, as both components may modulate extinction retention. These results could help identifying hormonal conditions that may enhance the effectiveness of extinction-based psychological therapies used in the treatment of fear-related disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20836,"journal":{"name":"Psychoneuroendocrinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453024002063/pdfft?md5=7f2049b8d0cffe47556d71aead632726&pid=1-s2.0-S0306453024002063-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoneuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453024002063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Difficulties in fear regulation can sometimes result in maladaptive fear responses. To better understand how to improve fear regulation, it is important to determine how known factors, such as sex hormone status and stress, might interact to influence fear memory. Research has shown that women with high estradiol levels (mid-cycle) and men exhibit better extinction retention compared to women with low estradiol levels (women in the early follicular cycle or using oral contraceptives). Stress has also been demonstrated to affect both the learning and retention of extinction. Despite documented interactions between stress and sex hormones, their combined effects have not been thoroughly studied. This study aims to examine the impact of stress as a function of sex hormone status on extinction learning and retention.

A total of 168 non-clinical participants were studied, including men (n = 46), women using oral contraceptives (n = 38), women in the early follicular phase (n = 40), and women in mid-cycle (n = 44). On Day 1, fear acquisition training was performed. On day 2, prior to extinction training, half of the participants were exposed to a psychosocial stressor, while the other half performed a non-stressful control task. On day 3, extinction retention was tested. Fear was quantified using skin conductance responses, while stress hormones were quantified through saliva samples.

Exposure to stress prior to extinction training did not affect extinction learning, regardless of sex hormone status. In contrast, pre-extinction stress exposure had different effects on extinction retention depending on hormone status. Stressed men showed impairment in extinction retention compared to controls, while the experimental condition had no effect on naturally cycling women. Regardless of stress exposure, early follicular women exhibited a deficit in fear regulation, while mid-cycle women showed effective fear regulation. Among women using oral contraceptives, the stress group demonstrated better extinction retention compared to the control group.

These results demonstrate the importance of considering sex hormone status and stress exposure during extinction learning, as both components may modulate extinction retention. These results could help identifying hormonal conditions that may enhance the effectiveness of extinction-based psychological therapies used in the treatment of fear-related disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解灭绝保持的性别差异:灭绝前的压力和性激素状态
恐惧调节方面的困难有时会导致适应不良的恐惧反应。为了更好地了解如何改善恐惧调节,重要的是要确定已知因素(如性激素状态和压力)如何相互作用影响恐惧记忆。研究表明,与雌二醇水平低的女性(卵泡周期早期或使用口服避孕药的女性)相比,雌二醇水平高的女性(生理周期中期)和男性表现出更好的消减保持能力。压力也被证明会影响消退的学习和保持。尽管压力和性激素之间存在相互作用,但对它们的综合影响还没有进行深入研究。本研究旨在探讨压力作为性激素状态的函数对绝迹学习和保持的影响。共有168名非临床参与者接受了研究,其中包括男性(46人)、使用口服避孕药的女性(38人)、处于卵泡早期的女性(40人)和处于周期中期的女性(44人)。第 1 天,进行恐惧习得训练。第 2 天,在进行消退训练之前,一半参与者暴露于社会心理压力下,另一半参与者则进行非压力控制任务。第 3 天,对消退保持能力进行测试。恐惧感通过皮肤电导反应进行量化,而压力荷尔蒙则通过唾液样本进行量化。无论性激素状况如何,绝迹训练前暴露于压力不会影响绝迹学习。相反,灭绝前的压力暴露对灭绝的保持有不同的影响,这取决于荷尔蒙状态。与对照组相比,压力过大的男性在熄灭保持方面表现出障碍,而实验条件对自然周期女性没有影响。无论暴露于何种压力下,卵泡早期的女性都表现出恐惧调节能力不足,而卵泡中期的女性则表现出有效的恐惧调节能力。在使用口服避孕药的女性中,与对照组相比,压力组表现出更好的消退保持能力。这些结果表明,在绝迹学习过程中考虑性激素状态和压力暴露非常重要,因为这两个因素都可能调节绝迹的保持。这些结果有助于确定激素状况,从而提高用于治疗恐惧相关疾病的消减心理疗法的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Psychoneuroendocrinology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
268
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Psychoneuroendocrinology publishes papers dealing with the interrelated disciplines of psychology, neurobiology, endocrinology, immunology, neurology, and psychiatry, with an emphasis on multidisciplinary studies aiming at integrating these disciplines in terms of either basic research or clinical implications. One of the main goals is to understand how a variety of psychobiological factors interact in the expression of the stress response as it relates to the development and/or maintenance of neuropsychiatric illnesses.
期刊最新文献
Early-life adversity severity, timing, and context type are associated with SLC6A4 methylation in emerging adults: Results from a prospective cohort study Editorial Board Special issue editorial: Intersectionality and biological embedding Emotion and birth control: Emotion regulation ERPs differ based on menstrual cycle phase and hormonal contraceptive use Fasting insulinemia as biomarker of illness relapse in patients with severe mental illness?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1