Experiences of participation in people with intellectual disability, in relation to service support received, and views from professionals in the field of disability.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1177/17446295241272692
Ann-Marie Öhrvall, Birgitta Wennberg, Pia Käcker, Helene Lidström
{"title":"Experiences of participation in people with intellectual disability, in relation to service support received, and views from professionals in the field of disability.","authors":"Ann-Marie Öhrvall, Birgitta Wennberg, Pia Käcker, Helene Lidström","doi":"10.1177/17446295241272692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> to describe experiences of people with intellectual disability of participating in the cognitive adapted annual national user survey of social services, and their perception of participation in the municipalities' improvement work. Additionally, social service professionals' views of opportunities to involve people with intellectual disability in improvement work based on survey results. <b>Methods:</b> Focus groups of people with intellectual disability and individual interviews with professionals were conducted and analysed, using content analysis. <b>Results:</b> People with intellectual disability expressed they felt listened to, and supported in expressing their views, but there was discrepancy between their and professionals' perceptions of whether their views were considered, and if they were involved in the improvement process. <b>Conclusions:</b> Evaluating services received from social services is important, expressed by people with intellectual disability and professionals, but improvement is needed to feed back results to social services clients, and to involve them in the improvement process.</p>","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295241272692"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241272692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: to describe experiences of people with intellectual disability of participating in the cognitive adapted annual national user survey of social services, and their perception of participation in the municipalities' improvement work. Additionally, social service professionals' views of opportunities to involve people with intellectual disability in improvement work based on survey results. Methods: Focus groups of people with intellectual disability and individual interviews with professionals were conducted and analysed, using content analysis. Results: People with intellectual disability expressed they felt listened to, and supported in expressing their views, but there was discrepancy between their and professionals' perceptions of whether their views were considered, and if they were involved in the improvement process. Conclusions: Evaluating services received from social services is important, expressed by people with intellectual disability and professionals, but improvement is needed to feed back results to social services clients, and to involve them in the improvement process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智障人士在获得服务支持方面的参与经验,以及残疾领域专业人士的观点。
目的:描述智障人士参与经过认知调整的年度全国社会服务用户调查的经历,以及他们对参与市政当局改进工作的看法。此外,根据调查结果,说明社会服务专业人员对智障人士参与改进工作的机会的看法。方法:采用内容分析法,对智障人士的焦点小组讨论和专业人士的个别访谈进行了分析。结果智障人士表示,他们在表达意见时感到被倾听和支持,但对于他们的意见是否被考虑以及他们是否参与了改进过程,智障人士和专业人员的看法存在差异。结论:智障人士和专业人员都表示,对社会服务机构提供的服务进行评估非常重要,但需要改进的是,应将评估结果反馈给社会服务对象,并让他们参与到改进过程中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.
期刊最新文献
Being a sibling of a child with intellectual disability from the perspective of mothers: A qualitative study. Corrigendum to "Validity and reliability of the persian version of the world health organization quality of life disabilities module". Understanding perspectives and research trends in Down syndrome neuropathogenesis: A bibliometric analysis. Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Expertise Team in the reduction of restrictive measures in sheltered care homes for people with an intellectual disability. Transitions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1