Patient preferences for adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide study from the GETAID.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241265776
Bénédicte Caron, Philippe Seksik, Anthony Buisson, Pauline Wils, Guillaume Savoye, Carmen Stefanescu, David Laharie, Lucas Guillo, Vered Abitbol, Joelle Bonnet, Romain Altwegg, Lucine Vuitton, Driffa Moussata, Arnaud Bourreille, Amélie Biron, Cyrielle Gilletta, Mathurin Fumery, Stephane Nahon, Stephane Nancey, Houda Camara, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
{"title":"Patient preferences for adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide study from the GETAID.","authors":"Bénédicte Caron, Philippe Seksik, Anthony Buisson, Pauline Wils, Guillaume Savoye, Carmen Stefanescu, David Laharie, Lucas Guillo, Vered Abitbol, Joelle Bonnet, Romain Altwegg, Lucine Vuitton, Driffa Moussata, Arnaud Bourreille, Amélie Biron, Cyrielle Gilletta, Mathurin Fumery, Stephane Nahon, Stephane Nancey, Houda Camara, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet","doi":"10.1177/17562848241265776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several adalimumab preparations are now available for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Comparative satisfaction and tolerability are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated IBD patient satisfaction with approved adalimumab biosimilars and their originator.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we included 941 consecutive adalimumab-treated patients with IBD across 45 centres affiliated with the Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du tube Digestif who completed a satisfaction questionnaire comprising four items each rated by a 10-point scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The differences in responses were performed using a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's honest significant difference test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most commonly used drugs at inclusion were Humira<sup>®</sup> (436/941, 46.3%), Amgevita<sup>®</sup> (177/941, 18.8%) and Hulio<sup>®</sup> (105/941, 11.2%). The mean overall satisfaction rate with adalimumab was 8.5 (standard deviation 1.8). Overall satisfaction was significantly higher in patients treated with Humira (8.6 (1.5)), Hulio (8.6 (1.8)) or Amgevita (8.5 (1.4)) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Satisfaction with the subcutaneous injection form was higher for patients treated with Yuflyma<sup>®</sup> (9.0 (1.4)), Humira (8.9 (1.3)) and Hulio (8.9 (1.7)) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A total of 299 patients (31.8%) described injection site reactions. In all, 223 patients (23.7%) reported being previously treated with another adalimumab of which (32/223, 14.3%) discontinued treatment due to side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world setting, patients with IBD had a high level of satisfaction with adalimumab treatment, with some differences in terms of overall satisfaction and satisfaction with the injection device.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241265776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several adalimumab preparations are now available for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Comparative satisfaction and tolerability are unknown.

Objectives: This study investigated IBD patient satisfaction with approved adalimumab biosimilars and their originator.

Design: In this cross-sectional study, we included 941 consecutive adalimumab-treated patients with IBD across 45 centres affiliated with the Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du tube Digestif who completed a satisfaction questionnaire comprising four items each rated by a 10-point scale.

Methods: The differences in responses were performed using a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's honest significant difference test.

Results: The most commonly used drugs at inclusion were Humira® (436/941, 46.3%), Amgevita® (177/941, 18.8%) and Hulio® (105/941, 11.2%). The mean overall satisfaction rate with adalimumab was 8.5 (standard deviation 1.8). Overall satisfaction was significantly higher in patients treated with Humira (8.6 (1.5)), Hulio (8.6 (1.8)) or Amgevita (8.5 (1.4)) (p < 0.05). Satisfaction with the subcutaneous injection form was higher for patients treated with Yuflyma® (9.0 (1.4)), Humira (8.9 (1.3)) and Hulio (8.9 (1.7)) (p < 0.05). A total of 299 patients (31.8%) described injection site reactions. In all, 223 patients (23.7%) reported being previously treated with another adalimumab of which (32/223, 14.3%) discontinued treatment due to side effects.

Conclusion: In this real-world setting, patients with IBD had a high level of satisfaction with adalimumab treatment, with some differences in terms of overall satisfaction and satisfaction with the injection device.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
炎症性肠病患者对阿达木单抗的偏好:来自 GETAID 的全国性研究。
背景:目前有多种阿达木单抗制剂可用于炎症性肠病(IBD)患者。其满意度和耐受性的比较尚不清楚:本研究调查了IBD患者对已获批准的阿达木单抗生物仿制药及其原研药的满意度:在这项横断面研究中,我们纳入了隶属于Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du tube Digestif的45个中心的941名连续接受过阿达木单抗治疗的IBD患者,他们填写了一份满意度问卷,问卷由4个项目组成,每个项目均采用10分制评分:方法:采用单因素方差分析和Tukey诚实显著性差异检验对回答进行差异分析:纳入研究时最常用的药物是Humira®(436/941,46.3%)、Amgevita®(177/941,18.8%)和Hulio®(105/941,11.2%)。阿达木单抗的平均总体满意度为8.5(标准差为1.8)。接受Humira(8.6(1.5))、Hulio(8.6(1.8))或Amgevita(8.5(1.4))治疗的患者总体满意度明显更高(P ®(9.0(1.4))、Humira(8.9(1.3))和Hulio(8.9(1.7))(P 结论:在这一真实世界环境中,IBD患者对阿达木单抗治疗的满意度很高,但在总体满意度和对注射装置的满意度方面存在一些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors of colorectal cancer in patients with Crohn's disease: American versus Korean tertiary referral center perspectives. Artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in ulcerative colitis. Weekend endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has similar outcomes as weekday procedures-a propensity score match analysis of the Hungarian ERCP Registry. Effectiveness of autologous emulsified stromal vascular fraction tissue injection for the treatment of complex perianal fistulas in inflammatory bowel diseases patients: a pilot study. Depression influences fatigue in inflammatory bowel disease amongst other factors: a structural modelling approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1