The association between task interdependence and participation in decision-making: a moderated mediation model in mental healthcare.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Interprofessional Care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1080/13561820.2024.2383239
François Durand, Marie-Josée Fleury
{"title":"The association between task interdependence and participation in decision-making: a moderated mediation model in mental healthcare.","authors":"François Durand, Marie-Josée Fleury","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2024.2383239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Participation in decision-making is crucial to healthcare workers collaborating across professions. Important correlates of participation in decision-making include task interdependence, informational role self-efficacy, and beliefs in the benefits of interprofessional collaboration. We hypothesised that although task interdependence is directly related to participation in decision-making, the relationship is mediated by informational role self-efficacy. Beliefs in the benefits in interprofessional collaboration act as a mediator. A sample of 315 mental healthcare workers answered validated questionnaires. Conditional processing was used to test the moderated mediation. Generally, the results confirmed our hypotheses. There was a direct relationship between task interdependence and participation in decision-making and it was mediated by informational role self-efficacy, and both relationships depend on whether healthcare workers believe in the benefits of interprofessional collaboration. However, although the moderation effect of beliefs in the benefits of interprofessional collaboration between task interdependence and informational role self-efficacy was positive, the moderation effect was negative for the relationship between task interdependence and participation in decision-making. Although there is an inherent logic in the positive relationships that were found, the negative moderation might be explained by the contrast between the structural view and the volitional view of task interdependence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"826-835"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2383239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participation in decision-making is crucial to healthcare workers collaborating across professions. Important correlates of participation in decision-making include task interdependence, informational role self-efficacy, and beliefs in the benefits of interprofessional collaboration. We hypothesised that although task interdependence is directly related to participation in decision-making, the relationship is mediated by informational role self-efficacy. Beliefs in the benefits in interprofessional collaboration act as a mediator. A sample of 315 mental healthcare workers answered validated questionnaires. Conditional processing was used to test the moderated mediation. Generally, the results confirmed our hypotheses. There was a direct relationship between task interdependence and participation in decision-making and it was mediated by informational role self-efficacy, and both relationships depend on whether healthcare workers believe in the benefits of interprofessional collaboration. However, although the moderation effect of beliefs in the benefits of interprofessional collaboration between task interdependence and informational role self-efficacy was positive, the moderation effect was negative for the relationship between task interdependence and participation in decision-making. Although there is an inherent logic in the positive relationships that were found, the negative moderation might be explained by the contrast between the structural view and the volitional view of task interdependence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
任务相互依赖与参与决策之间的关联:心理医疗保健中的调节中介模型。
参与决策对于医护人员的跨专业合作至关重要。参与决策的重要相关因素包括任务相互依赖性、信息角色自我效能感以及对跨专业合作益处的信念。我们的假设是,虽然任务相互依赖与参与决策直接相关,但这种关系是由信息角色自我效能感中介的。对跨专业合作益处的信念是中介因素。315名心理健康工作者回答了有效问卷。我们采用条件处理法来检验调节中介作用。总体而言,结果证实了我们的假设。任务相互依赖与参与决策之间存在直接关系,并且这种关系受到信息角色自我效能感的调节,而这两种关系都取决于医护人员是否相信跨专业合作的益处。然而,尽管任务相互依赖和信息角色自我效能感之间的跨专业协作益处信念的调节效应是正的,但任务相互依赖和参与决策之间关系的调节效应却是负的。虽然发现的正向关系有其内在逻辑,但负向调节作用可能是由任务相互依赖的结构观和意志观之间的对比造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of an acute medical unit in internal medicine on interprofessional collaboration. Team training for the interprofessional management of opioid use disorder with the ECHO model. Physician experiences of team-based clinical microsystems: implications for the future of inpatient interprofessional communication. Assessment of the modified attitudes toward health care teams scale using item response theory analysis. Clinician experience of being interprofessional: an interpretive phenomenological analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1