Comparison of low-dose ketamine to methadone for postoperative pain in opioid addicts: a randomized clinical trial.

Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.17085/apm.23129
Elham Bakhtiari, Mehrdad Mokaram Dori, Millad Reza Darban Razavi, Andia Peivandi Yazdi, Arash Peivandi Yazdi
{"title":"Comparison of low-dose ketamine to methadone for postoperative pain in opioid addicts: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Elham Bakhtiari, Mehrdad Mokaram Dori, Millad Reza Darban Razavi, Andia Peivandi Yazdi, Arash Peivandi Yazdi","doi":"10.17085/apm.23129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain can lead to several complications. The effectiveness of different opioids in relieving pain after surgery has been widely studied. However, managing pain in patients with opioid addiction is still challenging. This study aimed to examine the impact of ketamine and methadone on postoperative pain in patients with addiction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. All included patients were monitored for morphine use, pain scores, and vital signs every 3 h. The intervention group received 0.5 mg/kg ketamine administered intravenously every 6 h. The control group received 5 mg of methadone intramuscularly every 8 h. The patient received intravenous morphine if their visual analog scale was above 3. All side effects in each group were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twenty patients were included in this study. There were 127 men (57.7%) with an average age of 57.1 ± 19.5 and 93 women (42.3%) with an average age of 57.1 ± 21.0. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the groups. There was no significant difference in the dose or frequency of morphine administration between groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in pain scores and vital signs at different time points. Drug side effects, including delirium and gastrointestinal symptoms, did not differ significantly between the methadone and ketamine groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our clinical data support the hypothesis that ketamine is not inferior to methadone in patients with addiction. Future randomize clinical trials are needed to confirm these observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"19 3","pages":"209-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain can lead to several complications. The effectiveness of different opioids in relieving pain after surgery has been widely studied. However, managing pain in patients with opioid addiction is still challenging. This study aimed to examine the impact of ketamine and methadone on postoperative pain in patients with addiction.

Methods: This was a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. All included patients were monitored for morphine use, pain scores, and vital signs every 3 h. The intervention group received 0.5 mg/kg ketamine administered intravenously every 6 h. The control group received 5 mg of methadone intramuscularly every 8 h. The patient received intravenous morphine if their visual analog scale was above 3. All side effects in each group were recorded.

Results: Two hundred and twenty patients were included in this study. There were 127 men (57.7%) with an average age of 57.1 ± 19.5 and 93 women (42.3%) with an average age of 57.1 ± 21.0. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the groups. There was no significant difference in the dose or frequency of morphine administration between groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in pain scores and vital signs at different time points. Drug side effects, including delirium and gastrointestinal symptoms, did not differ significantly between the methadone and ketamine groups.

Conclusions: Our clinical data support the hypothesis that ketamine is not inferior to methadone in patients with addiction. Future randomize clinical trials are needed to confirm these observations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低剂量氯胺酮与美沙酮治疗阿片类药物成瘾者术后疼痛的比较:随机临床试验。
背景:术后疼痛可导致多种并发症。不同阿片类药物在缓解术后疼痛方面的效果已得到广泛研究。然而,治疗阿片类药物成瘾患者的疼痛仍具有挑战性。本研究旨在探讨氯胺酮和美沙酮对成瘾患者术后疼痛的影响:这是一项非劣效性随机临床试验。干预组每 6 小时静脉注射 0.5 毫克/千克氯胺酮,对照组每 8 小时肌肉注射 5 毫克美沙酮。每组的所有副作用均被记录在案:本研究共纳入 220 名患者。其中男性 127 人(57.7%),平均年龄(57.1±19.5)岁;女性 93 人(42.3%),平均年龄(57.1±21.0)岁。两组的人口统计学特征无明显差异。组间吗啡剂量和给药频率无明显差异。各组在不同时间点的疼痛评分和生命体征无明显差异。药物副作用,包括谵妄和胃肠道症状,在美沙酮组和氯胺酮组之间没有显著差异:我们的临床数据支持这样的假设,即氯胺酮对成瘾患者的治疗效果并不亚于美沙酮。结论:我们的临床数据支持氯胺酮在治疗成瘾患者方面并不逊色于美沙酮的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of characteristics of patients whose sugammadex claims were denied by the Auto Insurance Claims Review Department of Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service: a retrospective single-center review. What is your optimal target of oxygen during general anesthesia in pediatric patients? Early extubation after pediatric cardiac surgery. Effective and safe pediatric sedation. Emergence delirium: an overview with an emphasis on the use of electroencephalography in its management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1