Evaluation of bite force after microplate and miniplate osteosynthesis for the management of undisplaced or minimally displaced anterior mandibular fractures: A clinical comparative study.

IF 2.7 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental and Medical Problems Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.17219/dmp/139736
Shrikant Shamrao Patil, Kumar Nilesh, Mounesh Kumar Chapi, Prashant Ashok Punde, Pankaj Patil, Payal Mate
{"title":"Evaluation of bite force after microplate and miniplate osteosynthesis for the management of undisplaced or minimally displaced anterior mandibular fractures: A clinical comparative study.","authors":"Shrikant Shamrao Patil, Kumar Nilesh, Mounesh Kumar Chapi, Prashant Ashok Punde, Pankaj Patil, Payal Mate","doi":"10.17219/dmp/139736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the microplate system is commonly used for the treatment of maxillofacial fractures, its use in the fixation of mandibular fractures is not widely accepted.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of microplates and miniplates in osteosynthesis for the internal fixation of undisplaced and minimally displaced anterior mandibular fractures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 40 patients diagnosed with undisplaced or minimally displaced symphyseal and parasymphyseal fractures were randomly assigned to 2 study groups (group A and group B). Patients in group A (microplate group) were treated with two 0.8-mm microplates, whereas patients in group B (miniplate group) received two 2.0-mm miniplates. Bite force values were recorded in 30 healthy individuals (control group) to establish baseline values. Postoperative bite force values were recorded at various intervals and compared between the study groups and the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated a progressive improvement in the bite force. However, the bite force values recorded at the 2nd, 4th and 6th postoperative weeks were comparatively lower in the microplate group. At the six-week follow-up, the bite force values were lower in both study groups in comparison to the control group. There were no differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of microplates in the management of undisplaced or minimally displaced anterior mandibular fractures results in a reduction in the recovery of biting force in comparison to the conventional miniplate system.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/139736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the microplate system is commonly used for the treatment of maxillofacial fractures, its use in the fixation of mandibular fractures is not widely accepted.

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of microplates and miniplates in osteosynthesis for the internal fixation of undisplaced and minimally displaced anterior mandibular fractures.

Material and methods: A total of 40 patients diagnosed with undisplaced or minimally displaced symphyseal and parasymphyseal fractures were randomly assigned to 2 study groups (group A and group B). Patients in group A (microplate group) were treated with two 0.8-mm microplates, whereas patients in group B (miniplate group) received two 2.0-mm miniplates. Bite force values were recorded in 30 healthy individuals (control group) to establish baseline values. Postoperative bite force values were recorded at various intervals and compared between the study groups and the control group.

Results: Both groups demonstrated a progressive improvement in the bite force. However, the bite force values recorded at the 2nd, 4th and 6th postoperative weeks were comparatively lower in the microplate group. At the six-week follow-up, the bite force values were lower in both study groups in comparison to the control group. There were no differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the study groups.

Conclusions: The use of microplates in the management of undisplaced or minimally displaced anterior mandibular fractures results in a reduction in the recovery of biting force in comparison to the conventional miniplate system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估微板和迷你板骨合成术治疗未移位或微小移位下颌骨前方骨折后的咬合力:临床比较研究。
背景:尽管微钢板系统常用于治疗颌面部骨折,但其在下颌骨骨折固定中的应用尚未被广泛接受:该研究旨在评估和比较微钢板和微型钢板在下颌骨前方未移位和微移位骨折的骨内固定中的疗效:将诊断为未移位或移位较小的交骨干和副骨干骨折的 40 名患者随机分配到 2 个研究组(A 组和 B 组)。A 组(微型钢板组)患者使用两块 0.8 毫米的微型钢板,而 B 组(微型钢板组)患者使用两块 2.0 毫米的微型钢板。记录 30 名健康人(对照组)的咬合力值,以确定基线值。在不同时间间隔记录术后咬合力值,并在研究组和对照组之间进行比较:结果:两组患者的咬合力都有逐步改善。结果:两组患者的咬合力都有逐渐改善,但微孔板组在术后第 2、4 和 6 周记录的咬合力值相对较低。在六周的随访中,两组的咬合力值均低于对照组。研究组之间的术后并发症发生率没有差异:结论:与传统的微型钢板系统相比,使用微型钢板治疗未移位或微小移位的下颌骨前方骨折可减少咬合力的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Most common congenital syndromes with facial asymmetry: A narrative review. Self-assessment skills of undergraduate students in operative dentistry: Preclinical performance and gender. Optical properties of advanced lithium disilicate. Studies on the content of toxic metals in teeth: A narrative review of literature. Kinesio Taping as an alternative therapy for limited mandibular mobility with pain in female patients with temporomandibular disorders: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1