Good Initial Visual Acuity in Patients with Macular Edema due to Retinal Vein Occlusion - Management and Outcomes.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1097/IAE.0000000000004244
Nir Gomel, Rossella D'Aloisio, Aya Wattad, Rodolfo Mastropasqua, Federico Formenti, Anat Loewenstein, Matias Iglicki, Dinah Zur
{"title":"Good Initial Visual Acuity in Patients with Macular Edema due to Retinal Vein Occlusion - Management and Outcomes.","authors":"Nir Gomel, Rossella D'Aloisio, Aya Wattad, Rodolfo Mastropasqua, Federico Formenti, Anat Loewenstein, Matias Iglicki, Dinah Zur","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The approach to managing patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and cystoid macular edema (CME) with good initial visual acuity (VA) better than 6/12 has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal treatment and observation in patients with CME due to RVO, who presented with good initial VA. Methods: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. Seventy-nine eyes of 79 patients with CME secondary to RVO and initial VA better than 6/12, either treated with anti-VEGF therapy or observed. Clinical parameters and OCT measures were recorded. Main Outcome Measure: Proportion of patients losing ≥1 line of VA at 12 months. Secondary outcomes: Visual and anatomical results at 12 and 24 months, and correlation between number of injections and VA outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three percent of patients maintained VA at month 12. VA of 6/6 - 6/7.5 was maintained in 59% and 57% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. At 24 months, the number of anti-VEGF injections was strongly correlated with VA among patients with BRVO and CRVO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study marks the first exploration of patients with RVO and initial VA better than 6/12, indicating that most patients sustained good VA, and anti-VEGF treatment maintained and improved VA.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The approach to managing patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and cystoid macular edema (CME) with good initial visual acuity (VA) better than 6/12 has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal treatment and observation in patients with CME due to RVO, who presented with good initial VA. Methods: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. Seventy-nine eyes of 79 patients with CME secondary to RVO and initial VA better than 6/12, either treated with anti-VEGF therapy or observed. Clinical parameters and OCT measures were recorded. Main Outcome Measure: Proportion of patients losing ≥1 line of VA at 12 months. Secondary outcomes: Visual and anatomical results at 12 and 24 months, and correlation between number of injections and VA outcomes.

Results: Fifty-three percent of patients maintained VA at month 12. VA of 6/6 - 6/7.5 was maintained in 59% and 57% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. At 24 months, the number of anti-VEGF injections was strongly correlated with VA among patients with BRVO and CRVO.

Conclusion: This study marks the first exploration of patients with RVO and initial VA better than 6/12, indicating that most patients sustained good VA, and anti-VEGF treatment maintained and improved VA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视网膜静脉闭塞导致黄斑水肿患者的良好初始视力--管理与疗效。
目的:视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)合并囊样黄斑水肿(CME)患者的初始视力(VA)优于 6/12,但其治疗方法尚未研究清楚。本研究旨在评估最初视力良好的 RVO 引起的囊样黄斑水肿患者接受玻璃体内治疗和观察的功能和解剖效果。方法:多中心回顾性队列研究:多中心回顾性队列研究。对79名继发于RVO的CME患者中的79只眼睛进行了观察,这些患者的初始视力优于6/12,接受了抗血管内皮生长因子治疗或观察。记录临床参数和 OCT 测量结果。主要结果指标:12个月时视力下降≥1行的患者比例。次要结果12个月和24个月时的视觉和解剖结果,以及注射次数与VA结果之间的相关性:结果:53%的患者在第 12 个月时保持了 VA。在 12 个月和 24 个月时,分别有 59% 和 57% 的患者 VA 保持在 6/6 - 6/7.5 之间。24 个月时,抗 VEGF 注射次数与 BRVO 和 CRVO 患者的 VA 密切相关:这项研究首次探讨了初始视力大于 6/12 的 RVO 患者,表明大多数患者的视力保持良好,抗血管内皮生长因子治疗维持并改善了视力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
554
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice. In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color. Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.
期刊最新文献
Surgical outcomes of tractional maculopathy associated with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy in children. Four-year outcomes after intravitreal aflibercept for macular neovascularization in patients with pathologic myopia. Real-World Long-Term Outcomes of Intravitreal Faricimab in Previously Treated Chronic Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. A Modified Girth-Hitch Suture Technique to Rescue Single-Haptic Dislocation of Scleral-Fixated Intraocular Lenses. SHORT-TERM REACTIVATION OF RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY AFTER PRIMARY RANIBIZUMAB TREATMENT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1