Nir Gomel, Rossella D'Aloisio, Aya Wattad, Rodolfo Mastropasqua, Federico Formenti, Anat Loewenstein, Matias Iglicki, Dinah Zur
{"title":"Good Initial Visual Acuity in Patients with Macular Edema due to Retinal Vein Occlusion - Management and Outcomes.","authors":"Nir Gomel, Rossella D'Aloisio, Aya Wattad, Rodolfo Mastropasqua, Federico Formenti, Anat Loewenstein, Matias Iglicki, Dinah Zur","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The approach to managing patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and cystoid macular edema (CME) with good initial visual acuity (VA) better than 6/12 has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal treatment and observation in patients with CME due to RVO, who presented with good initial VA. Methods: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. Seventy-nine eyes of 79 patients with CME secondary to RVO and initial VA better than 6/12, either treated with anti-VEGF therapy or observed. Clinical parameters and OCT measures were recorded. Main Outcome Measure: Proportion of patients losing ≥1 line of VA at 12 months. Secondary outcomes: Visual and anatomical results at 12 and 24 months, and correlation between number of injections and VA outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three percent of patients maintained VA at month 12. VA of 6/6 - 6/7.5 was maintained in 59% and 57% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. At 24 months, the number of anti-VEGF injections was strongly correlated with VA among patients with BRVO and CRVO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study marks the first exploration of patients with RVO and initial VA better than 6/12, indicating that most patients sustained good VA, and anti-VEGF treatment maintained and improved VA.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The approach to managing patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and cystoid macular edema (CME) with good initial visual acuity (VA) better than 6/12 has not been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal treatment and observation in patients with CME due to RVO, who presented with good initial VA. Methods: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. Seventy-nine eyes of 79 patients with CME secondary to RVO and initial VA better than 6/12, either treated with anti-VEGF therapy or observed. Clinical parameters and OCT measures were recorded. Main Outcome Measure: Proportion of patients losing ≥1 line of VA at 12 months. Secondary outcomes: Visual and anatomical results at 12 and 24 months, and correlation between number of injections and VA outcomes.
Results: Fifty-three percent of patients maintained VA at month 12. VA of 6/6 - 6/7.5 was maintained in 59% and 57% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. At 24 months, the number of anti-VEGF injections was strongly correlated with VA among patients with BRVO and CRVO.
Conclusion: This study marks the first exploration of patients with RVO and initial VA better than 6/12, indicating that most patients sustained good VA, and anti-VEGF treatment maintained and improved VA.
期刊介绍:
RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice.
In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color.
Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.