Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability of the Electronic Patient Benefit Index for Psoriasis in Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Study.

Q3 Medicine JMIR dermatology Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.2196/54762
Marina Otten, Vahid Djamei, Matthias Augustin
{"title":"Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability of the Electronic Patient Benefit Index for Psoriasis in Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Marina Otten, Vahid Djamei, Matthias Augustin","doi":"10.2196/54762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes are relevant in clinical practice showing patient benefits, supporting clinicians' decision-making, and contributing to the delivery of high standards of care. Digital monitoring of patient-reported outcomes is still rare. The Patient Benefit Index (PBI) measures benefits and goals from patients' views and may be relevant for regular documentation and shared decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop electronic versions of the PBI to examine their feasibility and acceptability in clinical practice for patients with psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed an app and a web version of the existing, valid PBI using focus groups and cognitive debriefings with patients before conducting a quantitative survey on its feasibility and acceptability. Conduction took part in an outpatient dermatology care unit in Germany. Descriptive and subgroup analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 139 patients completed the electronic PBIs (ePBIs) and took part in the survey. The ePBI was understandable (n=129-137, 92.8%-98.6%) and feasible, for example, easy to read (n=135, 97.1%) and simple to handle (n=137, 98.5%). Acceptability was also high, for example, patients can imagine using and discussing the ePBI data in practice (n=91, 65.5%) and documenting it regularly (n=88, 63.3%). They believe it could support treatment decisions (n=118, 84.9%) and improve communication with their physician (n=112, 81.3%). They can imagine filling in electronic questionnaires regularly (n=118, 84.9%), even preferring electronic over paper versions (n=113, 81.2%). Older and less educated people show less feasibility, but the latter expected the relationship with their physician to improve and would be more willing to invest time or effort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The app and web version of the PBI are usable and acceptable for patients offering comprehensive documentation and patient participation in practice. An implementation strategy should consider patients' needs, barriers, and facilitators but also physicians' attitudes and requirements from the health care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"7 ","pages":"e54762"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/54762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes are relevant in clinical practice showing patient benefits, supporting clinicians' decision-making, and contributing to the delivery of high standards of care. Digital monitoring of patient-reported outcomes is still rare. The Patient Benefit Index (PBI) measures benefits and goals from patients' views and may be relevant for regular documentation and shared decision-making.

Objective: This study aimed to develop electronic versions of the PBI to examine their feasibility and acceptability in clinical practice for patients with psoriasis.

Methods: We developed an app and a web version of the existing, valid PBI using focus groups and cognitive debriefings with patients before conducting a quantitative survey on its feasibility and acceptability. Conduction took part in an outpatient dermatology care unit in Germany. Descriptive and subgroup analyses were conducted.

Results: A total of 139 patients completed the electronic PBIs (ePBIs) and took part in the survey. The ePBI was understandable (n=129-137, 92.8%-98.6%) and feasible, for example, easy to read (n=135, 97.1%) and simple to handle (n=137, 98.5%). Acceptability was also high, for example, patients can imagine using and discussing the ePBI data in practice (n=91, 65.5%) and documenting it regularly (n=88, 63.3%). They believe it could support treatment decisions (n=118, 84.9%) and improve communication with their physician (n=112, 81.3%). They can imagine filling in electronic questionnaires regularly (n=118, 84.9%), even preferring electronic over paper versions (n=113, 81.2%). Older and less educated people show less feasibility, but the latter expected the relationship with their physician to improve and would be more willing to invest time or effort.

Conclusions: The app and web version of the PBI are usable and acceptable for patients offering comprehensive documentation and patient participation in practice. An implementation strategy should consider patients' needs, barriers, and facilitators but also physicians' attitudes and requirements from the health care system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床实践中银屑病电子患者受益指数的开发、可行性和可接受性:混合方法研究。
背景:患者报告的结果与临床实践息息相关,可显示患者的获益,支持临床医生的决策,并有助于提供高标准的护理。对患者报告结果进行数字化监测的情况还很少见。患者获益指数(PBI)从患者的角度衡量获益和目标,可能与定期记录和共同决策相关:本研究旨在开发电子版 PBI,以检验其在银屑病患者临床实践中的可行性和可接受性:方法:在对其可行性和可接受性进行定量调查之前,我们通过焦点小组和患者认知汇报,开发了现有有效 PBI 的应用程序和网络版。调查在德国一家皮肤科门诊部进行。对结果进行了描述性分析和亚组分析:结果:共有 139 名患者完成了电子 PBI(ePBI)并参与了调查。ePBI具有可理解性(n=129-137,92.8%-98.6%)和可行性,例如易于阅读(n=135,97.1%)和操作简单(n=137,98.5%)。接受度也很高,例如,患者可以想象在实践中使用和讨论 ePBI 数据(n=91,65.5%),并定期记录(n=88,63.3%)。他们认为这可以为治疗决策提供支持(人数=118,占 84.9%),并改善与医生的沟通(人数=112,占 81.3%)。他们可以想象定期填写电子问卷的情景(人数=118,84.9%),甚至比纸质问卷更喜欢电子问卷(人数=113,81.2%)。年龄较大和受教育程度较低的人显示出较低的可行性,但后者期望与医生的关系得到改善,并更愿意投入时间或精力:PBI的应用程序和网络版对患者来说是可用的和可接受的,能提供全面的记录和患者参与实践。实施策略不仅要考虑患者的需求、障碍和促进因素,还要考虑医生的态度和医疗保健系统的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Prevalence of Dermoscopy Use Among Dermatology Residents in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study. Patterns of Public Interest in Lipomas and Lipoma-Removal Procedures: Google Trends Analysis. The Comparative Sufficiency of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing AI in Answering Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis Questions About Common Dermatological Diagnoses. Modern Digital Query Analytics of Patient Education Materials on Acanthosis Nigricans: Systematic Search and Content Analysis. The Depth Estimation and Visualization of Dermatological Lesions: Development and Usability Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1