Effects of CRAMP on the gut-brain axis in experimental sepsis

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Immunology letters Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.imlet.2024.106906
Ewerton Vinícius Macarini Bruzaferro, Thais Martins de Lima, Suely Kubo Ariga, Denise Frediani Barbeiro, Hermes Vieira Barbeiro, Fabiano Pinheiro da Silva
{"title":"Effects of CRAMP on the gut-brain axis in experimental sepsis","authors":"Ewerton Vinícius Macarini Bruzaferro,&nbsp;Thais Martins de Lima,&nbsp;Suely Kubo Ariga,&nbsp;Denise Frediani Barbeiro,&nbsp;Hermes Vieira Barbeiro,&nbsp;Fabiano Pinheiro da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.imlet.2024.106906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The collaboration between the microbiota, mucosa, and intestinal epithelium is crucial for defending against pathogens and external antigens. Dysbiosis disrupts this balance, allowing pathogens to thrive and potentially enter the bloodstream, triggering immune dysregulation and potentially leading to sepsis. Antimicrobial peptides like LL-37 and CRAMP are pivotal in innate immune defense. Their expression varies with infection severity, exhibiting a dual pro- and anti-inflammatory response. Understanding this dynamic is key to comprehending sepsis progression.</p><p>In our study, we examined the inflammatory response in CRAMP knockout mice post-cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). We assessed its impact on brain tissue damage and the intestinal microbiota. Our findings revealed higher gene expression of S100A8 and S100A9 in the prefrontal cortex of wild-type mice versus CRAMP-knockout mice. This trend was consistent in the hippocampus and cerebellum, although protein concentrations remained constant. Notably, there was a notable increase in <em>Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus</em> spp., and <em>Enterococcus faecalis</em> populations in wild-type mice 24 h post-CLP compared to the CRAMP-deficient group. These results align with our previous data suggesting that the absence of CRAMP may confer protection in this sepsis model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13413,"journal":{"name":"Immunology letters","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 106906"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunology letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165247824000804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The collaboration between the microbiota, mucosa, and intestinal epithelium is crucial for defending against pathogens and external antigens. Dysbiosis disrupts this balance, allowing pathogens to thrive and potentially enter the bloodstream, triggering immune dysregulation and potentially leading to sepsis. Antimicrobial peptides like LL-37 and CRAMP are pivotal in innate immune defense. Their expression varies with infection severity, exhibiting a dual pro- and anti-inflammatory response. Understanding this dynamic is key to comprehending sepsis progression.

In our study, we examined the inflammatory response in CRAMP knockout mice post-cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). We assessed its impact on brain tissue damage and the intestinal microbiota. Our findings revealed higher gene expression of S100A8 and S100A9 in the prefrontal cortex of wild-type mice versus CRAMP-knockout mice. This trend was consistent in the hippocampus and cerebellum, although protein concentrations remained constant. Notably, there was a notable increase in Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus spp., and Enterococcus faecalis populations in wild-type mice 24 h post-CLP compared to the CRAMP-deficient group. These results align with our previous data suggesting that the absence of CRAMP may confer protection in this sepsis model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CRAMP 对实验性败血症中肠道-大脑轴的影响。
微生物群、粘膜和肠上皮之间的协作对于抵御病原体和外部抗原至关重要。菌群失调破坏了这种平衡,使病原体得以滋生并有可能进入血液,引发免疫失调,并有可能导致败血症。LL-37 和 CRAMP 等抗菌肽在先天性免疫防御中起着关键作用。它们的表达随感染严重程度而变化,表现出促进和抗炎的双重反应。了解这种动态变化是理解败血症进展的关键。在我们的研究中,我们检测了CRAMP基因敲除小鼠在髓腔结扎和穿刺(CLP)后的炎症反应。我们评估了它对脑组织损伤和肠道微生物群的影响。我们的研究结果表明,野生型小鼠与 CRAMP 基因敲除小鼠相比,前额叶皮层中 S100A8 和 S100A9 的基因表达量更高。尽管蛋白质浓度保持不变,但这一趋势在海马和小脑中也是一致的。值得注意的是,与 CRAMP 缺失组相比,野生型小鼠在 CLP 24 小时后的大肠杆菌、乳酸杆菌和粪肠球菌数量明显增加。这些结果与我们之前的数据一致,表明在这种败血症模型中,CRAMP 的缺失可能会产生保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Immunology letters
Immunology letters 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Immunology Letters provides a vehicle for the speedy publication of experimental papers, (mini)Reviews and Letters to the Editor addressing all aspects of molecular and cellular immunology. The essential criteria for publication will be clarity, experimental soundness and novelty. Results contradictory to current accepted thinking or ideas divergent from actual dogmas will be considered for publication provided that they are based on solid experimental findings. Preference will be given to papers of immediate importance to other investigators, either by their experimental data, new ideas or new methodology. Scientific correspondence to the Editor-in-Chief related to the published papers may also be accepted provided that they are short and scientifically relevant to the papers mentioned, in order to provide a continuing forum for discussion.
期刊最新文献
Vaccine safety in children with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease The roles of collectins in renal diseases and transplantation Human dendritic cell differentiation in hematopoietic stem cell-transplanted NOG hFLT3L Tg/mFlt3 KO humanized mice Rescuing pathogen-specific memory B-cell from PBMC of prior Zika virus-infected individuals Eosinophils are sparse in homeostatic rectal tissue which impedes studying resident eosinophils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1