{"title":"Effects of CRAMP on the gut-brain axis in experimental sepsis","authors":"Ewerton Vinícius Macarini Bruzaferro, Thais Martins de Lima, Suely Kubo Ariga, Denise Frediani Barbeiro, Hermes Vieira Barbeiro, Fabiano Pinheiro da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.imlet.2024.106906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The collaboration between the microbiota, mucosa, and intestinal epithelium is crucial for defending against pathogens and external antigens. Dysbiosis disrupts this balance, allowing pathogens to thrive and potentially enter the bloodstream, triggering immune dysregulation and potentially leading to sepsis. Antimicrobial peptides like LL-37 and CRAMP are pivotal in innate immune defense. Their expression varies with infection severity, exhibiting a dual pro- and anti-inflammatory response. Understanding this dynamic is key to comprehending sepsis progression.</p><p>In our study, we examined the inflammatory response in CRAMP knockout mice post-cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). We assessed its impact on brain tissue damage and the intestinal microbiota. Our findings revealed higher gene expression of S100A8 and S100A9 in the prefrontal cortex of wild-type mice versus CRAMP-knockout mice. This trend was consistent in the hippocampus and cerebellum, although protein concentrations remained constant. Notably, there was a notable increase in <em>Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus</em> spp., and <em>Enterococcus faecalis</em> populations in wild-type mice 24 h post-CLP compared to the CRAMP-deficient group. These results align with our previous data suggesting that the absence of CRAMP may confer protection in this sepsis model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13413,"journal":{"name":"Immunology letters","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 106906"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunology letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165247824000804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The collaboration between the microbiota, mucosa, and intestinal epithelium is crucial for defending against pathogens and external antigens. Dysbiosis disrupts this balance, allowing pathogens to thrive and potentially enter the bloodstream, triggering immune dysregulation and potentially leading to sepsis. Antimicrobial peptides like LL-37 and CRAMP are pivotal in innate immune defense. Their expression varies with infection severity, exhibiting a dual pro- and anti-inflammatory response. Understanding this dynamic is key to comprehending sepsis progression.
In our study, we examined the inflammatory response in CRAMP knockout mice post-cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). We assessed its impact on brain tissue damage and the intestinal microbiota. Our findings revealed higher gene expression of S100A8 and S100A9 in the prefrontal cortex of wild-type mice versus CRAMP-knockout mice. This trend was consistent in the hippocampus and cerebellum, although protein concentrations remained constant. Notably, there was a notable increase in Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus spp., and Enterococcus faecalis populations in wild-type mice 24 h post-CLP compared to the CRAMP-deficient group. These results align with our previous data suggesting that the absence of CRAMP may confer protection in this sepsis model.
期刊介绍:
Immunology Letters provides a vehicle for the speedy publication of experimental papers, (mini)Reviews and Letters to the Editor addressing all aspects of molecular and cellular immunology. The essential criteria for publication will be clarity, experimental soundness and novelty. Results contradictory to current accepted thinking or ideas divergent from actual dogmas will be considered for publication provided that they are based on solid experimental findings.
Preference will be given to papers of immediate importance to other investigators, either by their experimental data, new ideas or new methodology. Scientific correspondence to the Editor-in-Chief related to the published papers may also be accepted provided that they are short and scientifically relevant to the papers mentioned, in order to provide a continuing forum for discussion.