Comparison of Amnio-Exchange With a Novel Synthetic Amniotic Fluid Versus Commercially Used Fluids for Fetal Therapy: An In Vivo Rodent Model.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1002/pd.6644
Samuel Martin, Jose L Peiro, Marc Oria, Braxton Forde
{"title":"Comparison of Amnio-Exchange With a Novel Synthetic Amniotic Fluid Versus Commercially Used Fluids for Fetal Therapy: An In Vivo Rodent Model.","authors":"Samuel Martin, Jose L Peiro, Marc Oria, Braxton Forde","doi":"10.1002/pd.6644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Normal Saline (NS) and Lactated Ringer's (LR) damage human amniotic epithelium in vitro when compared with a synthetic amniotic fluid (Amnio-well, AW). We sought to evaluate the effect of amnio-exchange with NS, LR, and AW in vivo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On day E17.5, pregnant rats underwent amnio-exchange with NS, LR, or AW. Fetuses in each pregnant rat that did not undergo amnio-exchange acted as controls. Amnions were harvested at E20.5 and ultrastructure evaluated via electron microscopy. Protein levels of cleaved matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and collagen 1 (Col1a) were evaluated via Western Blot. Connexin-43 expression was evaluated via immunofluorescence (IF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an increase in amnion microfractures and epithelial cellular shrinkage with NS and LR compared with control and AW. The cleaved MMP9/Col1 ratio was increased 3.9-fold in NS (p < 0.001) and 4.5-fold LR (p = 0.0201) relative to control, whereas AW expression was similar to control (p = 0.636). Connexin-43 was also increased on IF in NS and LR relative to AW (mean gray intensity 26.5 ± 4.5, 26.5 ± 6.7, 19.2 ± 3.4, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Amnio-exchange with NS and LR led to increased amniotic microfractures and collagen degradation compared with synthetic amniotic fluid. Larger models are warranted to validate or refute these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Normal Saline (NS) and Lactated Ringer's (LR) damage human amniotic epithelium in vitro when compared with a synthetic amniotic fluid (Amnio-well, AW). We sought to evaluate the effect of amnio-exchange with NS, LR, and AW in vivo.

Methods: On day E17.5, pregnant rats underwent amnio-exchange with NS, LR, or AW. Fetuses in each pregnant rat that did not undergo amnio-exchange acted as controls. Amnions were harvested at E20.5 and ultrastructure evaluated via electron microscopy. Protein levels of cleaved matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and collagen 1 (Col1a) were evaluated via Western Blot. Connexin-43 expression was evaluated via immunofluorescence (IF).

Results: There was an increase in amnion microfractures and epithelial cellular shrinkage with NS and LR compared with control and AW. The cleaved MMP9/Col1 ratio was increased 3.9-fold in NS (p < 0.001) and 4.5-fold LR (p = 0.0201) relative to control, whereas AW expression was similar to control (p = 0.636). Connexin-43 was also increased on IF in NS and LR relative to AW (mean gray intensity 26.5 ± 4.5, 26.5 ± 6.7, 19.2 ± 3.4, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Amnio-exchange with NS and LR led to increased amniotic microfractures and collagen degradation compared with synthetic amniotic fluid. Larger models are warranted to validate or refute these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新型合成羊水与市售羊水进行 Amnio-Exchange 胎儿治疗的比较:体内啮齿动物模型
目的:与合成羊水(Amnio-well,AW)相比,正常生理盐水(NS)和乳酸林格氏液(LR)在体外会损伤人类羊膜上皮。我们试图评估在体内使用 NS、LR 和 AW 进行羊水交换的效果:在 E17.5 天,妊娠大鼠分别接受了 NS、LR 或 AW 羊水置换。每只妊娠大鼠中未进行羊膜腔穿刺的胎儿作为对照。在 E20.5 期收获羊水,并通过电子显微镜评估超微结构。通过 Western Blot 评估裂解基质金属蛋白酶 9(MMP9)和胶原 1(Col1a)的蛋白水平。通过免疫荧光(IF)评估连接蛋白-43的表达:结果:与对照组和 AW 相比,NS 和 LR 会导致羊膜微裂和上皮细胞萎缩。NS的MMP9/Col1裂解比率增加了3.9倍(p 结论:NS和LR的羊膜微裂和上皮细胞收缩比对照组和AW增加:与合成羊水相比,用 NS 和 LR 进行羊膜腔置换会导致羊膜微裂和胶原降解增加。需要更大的模型来验证或反驳这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
期刊最新文献
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Prenatally Identified Congenital Aqueductal Stenosis by Fetal MRI. Prenatal Diagnosis of Warsaw Breakage Syndrome: Fetal Compound Heterozygous Variants in the DDX11 Gene Associated With Growth Restriction, Cerebral, and Extra-Cerebral Malformations. Aberrant Fetal Brain Sulcus Formation: A Clue to the Diagnosis of Sotos Syndrome. Application of Genetic Origin Analysis of Copy Number Variations in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing. Contemporary Outcomes of a National Fetal Spina Bifida Surgery Service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1