Gastric variceal obstruction improves the efficacy of endoscopic management of esophageal variceal bleeding in GOV type I.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-08-08 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2360-4490
Xiaoquan Huang, Detong Zou, Huishan Wang, Wei Chen, Lili Zhang, Feng Li, Lili Ma, Chunqing Zhang, Ying Chen, Shiyao Chen
{"title":"Gastric variceal obstruction improves the efficacy of endoscopic management of esophageal variceal bleeding in GOV type I.","authors":"Xiaoquan Huang, Detong Zou, Huishan Wang, Wei Chen, Lili Zhang, Feng Li, Lili Ma, Chunqing Zhang, Ying Chen, Shiyao Chen","doi":"10.1055/a-2360-4490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Limited data exist regarding endoscopic obstruction of type I gastroesophageal (GOV I) in managing bleeding from esophageal varices. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we aimed to access the efficacy of blocking gastric varices in management of bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV1. <b>Patients and methods</b> Cirrhotic patients experiencing bleeding from esophageal varices and having GOV I gastric varices in four centers were screened. All included patients were followed up for 180 days, or until death. <b>Results</b> A total of 93 cirrhotic patients with GOV I and bleeding esophageal varices were included. Among them, 58 patients underwent endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (ECI) for gastric varices in addition to treatment for esophageal varices (EV), while the remaining 35 patients received treatment for EV only. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the cumulative 180-day rebleeding rate was significantly lower in the ECI plus EV treatment group (7.9%) compared with the EV treatment group (30.7%) ( <i>P</i> = 0.0031). The cumulative incidence of 180-day mortality was 1.9% in the ECI plus EV treatment group and 23.9% in the EV treatment group ( <i>P</i> = 0.0010). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that concomitant ECI treatment was an independent protective factor against 180-day rebleeding and overall mortality. <b>Conclusions</b> In conclusion, obstruction of gastric varices in addition to endoscopic treatment for bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV 1 proved superior to endoscopic treatment alone for esophageal variceal bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 8","pages":"E940-E946"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11309793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2360-4490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims Limited data exist regarding endoscopic obstruction of type I gastroesophageal (GOV I) in managing bleeding from esophageal varices. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we aimed to access the efficacy of blocking gastric varices in management of bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV1. Patients and methods Cirrhotic patients experiencing bleeding from esophageal varices and having GOV I gastric varices in four centers were screened. All included patients were followed up for 180 days, or until death. Results A total of 93 cirrhotic patients with GOV I and bleeding esophageal varices were included. Among them, 58 patients underwent endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (ECI) for gastric varices in addition to treatment for esophageal varices (EV), while the remaining 35 patients received treatment for EV only. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the cumulative 180-day rebleeding rate was significantly lower in the ECI plus EV treatment group (7.9%) compared with the EV treatment group (30.7%) ( P = 0.0031). The cumulative incidence of 180-day mortality was 1.9% in the ECI plus EV treatment group and 23.9% in the EV treatment group ( P = 0.0010). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that concomitant ECI treatment was an independent protective factor against 180-day rebleeding and overall mortality. Conclusions In conclusion, obstruction of gastric varices in addition to endoscopic treatment for bleeding from esophageal varices in patients with GOV 1 proved superior to endoscopic treatment alone for esophageal variceal bleeding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃食管静脉曲张阻塞可提高内镜治疗 GOV I 型食管静脉曲张出血的疗效。
背景和研究目的 关于内镜下阻断 I 型胃食管(GOV I)治疗食管静脉曲张出血的数据有限。在这项多中心回顾性队列研究中,我们旨在了解阻断胃静脉曲张对治疗 GOV1 患者食管静脉曲张出血的疗效。患者和方法 筛选了四个中心的食管静脉曲张出血且患有 GOV I 型胃静脉曲张的肝硬化患者。对所有纳入患者进行了为期 180 天的随访,或随访至患者死亡。结果 共纳入了 93 名 GOV I 型和食管静脉曲张出血的肝硬化患者。其中,58名患者在接受内镜下氰基丙烯酸酯注射(ECI)治疗胃静脉曲张的同时还接受了食管静脉曲张(EV)治疗,其余35名患者仅接受了食管静脉曲张治疗。卡普兰-梅耶分析显示,ECI加EV治疗组的180天累计再出血率(7.9%)明显低于EV治疗组(30.7%)(P = 0.0031)。ECI加EV治疗组的180天累计死亡率为1.9%,EV治疗组为23.9% ( P = 0.0010)。多变量 Cox 回归分析表明,同时接受 ECI 治疗是降低 180 天再出血和总死亡率的独立保护因素。结论 总之,对于 GOV 1 患者的食管静脉曲张出血,在内镜治疗的同时阻塞胃静脉曲张证明优于单纯内镜治疗食管静脉曲张出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1