Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of a Controversial Entity.

IF 0.5 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE International Journal of Angiology Pub Date : 2024-02-16 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1780536
Karan Sarode, Amar Patel, Kedzie Arrington, Rakhee Makhija, Debabrata Mukherjee
{"title":"Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of a Controversial Entity.","authors":"Karan Sarode, Amar Patel, Kedzie Arrington, Rakhee Makhija, Debabrata Mukherjee","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1780536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pericardial decompression syndrome is an ambiguous clinical entity which has generated controversy regarding its existence. Following pericardial decompression, patients experienced clinical deterioration ranging in complications from pulmonary edema to death that could not be attributed to any other distinct clinical pathology. Multiple theories have suggested the pathophysiology behind pericardial decompression syndrome is related to preload-afterload mismatch following pericardial decompression, coronary microvascular ischemia, and stress from high adrenergic state. Our review aims to describe this syndrome by analyzing demographics, etiology of pericardial effusion, method of drainage, volume of pericardial fluid removed, time to decompensation, and clinical outcomes. A systematic review of MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar literature databases were queried for case reports, case series, review articles, and abstracts published in English journals between 1983 and December 2022. Each author's interpretation of echocardiographic and/or pulmonary arterial catheterization data provided in the case reports was used to characterize ventricular dysfunction. Based on our inclusion criteria, 72 cases of pericardial decompression syndrome were included in our review. Our results showed that phenotypic heterogeneity was present based on echocardiographic findings of right/left or biventricular failure with similar proportions in each type of ventricular dysfunction. Time to decompensation was similar between immediate, subacute, and acute cases with presentation varying between hypoxic respiratory failure and shock. This review article highlights theories behind the pathophysiology, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic options in this high mortality condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":13798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Angiology","volume":"33 3","pages":"139-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1780536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pericardial decompression syndrome is an ambiguous clinical entity which has generated controversy regarding its existence. Following pericardial decompression, patients experienced clinical deterioration ranging in complications from pulmonary edema to death that could not be attributed to any other distinct clinical pathology. Multiple theories have suggested the pathophysiology behind pericardial decompression syndrome is related to preload-afterload mismatch following pericardial decompression, coronary microvascular ischemia, and stress from high adrenergic state. Our review aims to describe this syndrome by analyzing demographics, etiology of pericardial effusion, method of drainage, volume of pericardial fluid removed, time to decompensation, and clinical outcomes. A systematic review of MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar literature databases were queried for case reports, case series, review articles, and abstracts published in English journals between 1983 and December 2022. Each author's interpretation of echocardiographic and/or pulmonary arterial catheterization data provided in the case reports was used to characterize ventricular dysfunction. Based on our inclusion criteria, 72 cases of pericardial decompression syndrome were included in our review. Our results showed that phenotypic heterogeneity was present based on echocardiographic findings of right/left or biventricular failure with similar proportions in each type of ventricular dysfunction. Time to decompensation was similar between immediate, subacute, and acute cases with presentation varying between hypoxic respiratory failure and shock. This review article highlights theories behind the pathophysiology, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic options in this high mortality condition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心包减压综合征:对有争议实体的全面回顾。
心包减压综合征是一种模棱两可的临床实体,它的存在引发了争议。心包减压后,患者会出现从肺水肿到死亡等各种并发症的临床恶化,而这些并发症无法归因于任何其他明显的临床病理。有多种理论认为,心包减压综合征背后的病理生理学与心包减压后的前负荷-后负荷不匹配、冠状动脉微血管缺血以及高肾上腺素能状态导致的应激有关。我们的综述旨在通过分析人口统计学、心包积液病因、引流方法、心包积液清除量、失代偿时间和临床结果来描述这种综合征。我们对 MEDLINE/PubMed 和 Google Scholar 文献数据库进行了系统性回顾,检索了 1983 年至 2022 年 12 月间发表在英文期刊上的病例报告、系列病例、综述文章和摘要。每位作者对病例报告中提供的超声心动图和/或肺动脉导管检查数据的解释被用来描述心室功能障碍的特征。根据我们的纳入标准,72 例心包减压综合征病例被纳入我们的综述。我们的研究结果表明,根据超声心动图发现的右心室/左心室或双心室衰竭,存在表型异质性,每种类型的心室功能障碍比例相似。即刻、亚急性和急性病例的失代偿时间相似,表现为缺氧性呼吸衰竭和休克。这篇综述文章重点介绍了这种高死亡率病症的病理生理学、临床结果和治疗方案背后的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Angiology
International Journal of Angiology PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Grayscale Inversion to aid Diagnosis of Acute Occlusive and Chronic Pulmonary Embolism on CT. Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms. Anticoagulation in the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism-A Review. Pericardial Decompression Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of a Controversial Entity. Diagnostic Strategies in Pulmonary Embolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1