Facilitators and Barriers in Integrated Social Care for Families Facing Multiple and Complex Problems: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.7768
Marcel van Eck, Roelof Ettema, Mariëlle Cloin, Tine Van Regenmortel
{"title":"Facilitators and Barriers in Integrated Social Care for Families Facing Multiple and Complex Problems: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Marcel van Eck, Roelof Ettema, Mariëlle Cloin, Tine Van Regenmortel","doi":"10.5334/ijic.7768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Families with multiple and complex problems often deal with multiple professionals and organizations for support. Integrated social care supposedly prevents the fragmentation of care that often occurs.We identified facilitators and barriers experienced by families receiving integrated social care and by the professionals who provide it.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed a scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's framework, using the following databases: PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, CINAHL, PubMed, and Medline. Furthermore, conducted a thematic analysis. The results were divided into facilitators and barriers of integrated social care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 278 studies and finally included sixteen in our scoping review. We identified facilitators, including: linking formal care with informal networks, promoting collaboration among professionals e.g., working in pairs, and professionals autonomy. We identified barriers, including: time constraints, tasks outside professionals' expertise, along with resistance to integrated collaboration among organizations. These findings can enhance the advancement of social integrated care as a promising approach to support families facing multiple and complex problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To empower families, integrated social care requires a systematic approach based on trust. It involves coordinated care, shared decision-making, informal networks and the participation of all family members, including children.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"24 3","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11312847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Families with multiple and complex problems often deal with multiple professionals and organizations for support. Integrated social care supposedly prevents the fragmentation of care that often occurs.We identified facilitators and barriers experienced by families receiving integrated social care and by the professionals who provide it.

Method: We performed a scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's framework, using the following databases: PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, CINAHL, PubMed, and Medline. Furthermore, conducted a thematic analysis. The results were divided into facilitators and barriers of integrated social care.

Results: We identified 278 studies and finally included sixteen in our scoping review. We identified facilitators, including: linking formal care with informal networks, promoting collaboration among professionals e.g., working in pairs, and professionals autonomy. We identified barriers, including: time constraints, tasks outside professionals' expertise, along with resistance to integrated collaboration among organizations. These findings can enhance the advancement of social integrated care as a promising approach to support families facing multiple and complex problems.

Conclusion: To empower families, integrated social care requires a systematic approach based on trust. It involves coordinated care, shared decision-making, informal networks and the participation of all family members, including children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为面临多重复杂问题的家庭提供综合社会关怀的促进因素和障碍:范围审查》。
导言:有多种复杂问题的家庭往往需要与多个专业人员和组织打交道,以获得支持。我们确定了接受综合社会护理的家庭和提供护理的专业人员所遇到的促进因素和障碍:我们按照 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的框架,使用以下数据库进行了范围界定审查:PsycINFO、Web of Science Core Collection、Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection、CINAHL、PubMed 和 Medline。此外,还进行了专题分析。结果分为社会综合护理的促进因素和障碍:我们确定了 278 项研究,并最终将 16 项研究纳入了范围界定审查。我们发现的促进因素包括:将正规护理与非正规网络联系起来、促进专业人员之间的合作(如结对工作)以及专业人员的自主权。我们还发现了一些障碍,包括:时间限制、专业人员专长之外的任务,以及各组织间综合合作的阻力。这些发现可以促进社会综合护理的发展,使其成为支持面临多种复杂问题的家庭的一种有前途的方法:为了增强家庭的能力,社会综合护理需要一种以信任为基础的系统方法。它涉及协调护理、共同决策、非正式网络和包括儿童在内的所有家庭成员的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
期刊最新文献
Lessons Learned From the Implementation of an Integrated Health and Social Care Child and Family Hub - a Case Study. Examining Macro-Level Barriers and Facilitators to Scaling Up Integrated Care from a Complexity Perspective: A Multi-Case Study of Cambodia, Slovenia, and Belgium. Process Evaluations for the Scale-Up of Complex Interventions - a Scoping Review. Cost of "Ideal Minimum Integrated Care" for Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension Patients in Cambodia Context: Provider Perspective. Addressing Child and Adolescent Mental Health Problems in the Community. Evaluation of a Consultation and Advise Team for Assessment, Support and Referral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1