Stressful life events, post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and mental health in individuals with intellectual disabilities: a scoping review

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI:10.1111/jir.13178
M. Rouleaux, N. Peters-Scheffer, R. Lindauer, L. Mevissen, R. Didden
{"title":"Stressful life events, post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and mental health in individuals with intellectual disabilities: a scoping review","authors":"M. Rouleaux,&nbsp;N. Peters-Scheffer,&nbsp;R. Lindauer,&nbsp;L. Mevissen,&nbsp;R. Didden","doi":"10.1111/jir.13178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Stressful life events are events that do not fulfil the A criterion of PTSD in the DSM-5(TR) but are perceived as negative by the person. There is an ongoing debate about the usefulness of the A criterion as a gate criterion for PTSD, and especially regarding which events qualify as traumatic or stressful life events. This debate is particularly important for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF), as they seem to be more likely to experience traumatic and stressful life events than their peers without ID-BIF and appear to be more susceptible to the disruptive effects of these events. As a result, people with ID-BIF are more likely to develop mental health and behavioural problems. There is insufficient knowledge about how the relationship between stressful life events and PTSD symptoms should be interpreted, how traumatic and stressful life events are defined and distinguished in people with ID, and whether the A criterion should be broadened for individuals with ID-BIF. The aim of this scoping review was to understand stressful life events and their relationship with PTSD symptoms, other mental health and/or behavioural problems in individuals with ID-BIF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-eight studies were included. Five studies focused on stressful life events and PTSD symptoms. The other studies examined associations between stressful life events and other mental health and/or behavioural problems. Most of the studies did not clearly differentiate between stressful and traumatic events according to the A criterion of PTSD in the DSM-IV (TR) or DSM-5(TR). Of the six studies in which stressful life events were specified and could be distinguished from traumatic events, one found a positive association between PTSD symptoms and stressful life events and five showed weak to strong positive associations with other mental health and/or behavioural problems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>PTSD symptoms following stressful life events in individuals with ID-BIF are underrepresented in the literature. The lack of a clear definition of stressful life events leads to a gap in the knowledge on whether and how stressful life events may lead to PTSD symptoms, other mental health and/or behavioural problems in individuals with ID-BIF. Therefore, no general conclusions or recommendations can be made regarding the appropriateness of the PTSD A criterion for individuals with ID-BIF. Further research is needed to establish the role of stressful life events in relation to PTSD symptoms and to inform the assessment and effective treatment in people with ID-BIF, as expert clinical experience studies suggest that broadening the PTSD A criterion should be considered for people with ID-BIF.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":"68 10","pages":"1087-1113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jir.13178","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Stressful life events are events that do not fulfil the A criterion of PTSD in the DSM-5(TR) but are perceived as negative by the person. There is an ongoing debate about the usefulness of the A criterion as a gate criterion for PTSD, and especially regarding which events qualify as traumatic or stressful life events. This debate is particularly important for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF), as they seem to be more likely to experience traumatic and stressful life events than their peers without ID-BIF and appear to be more susceptible to the disruptive effects of these events. As a result, people with ID-BIF are more likely to develop mental health and behavioural problems. There is insufficient knowledge about how the relationship between stressful life events and PTSD symptoms should be interpreted, how traumatic and stressful life events are defined and distinguished in people with ID, and whether the A criterion should be broadened for individuals with ID-BIF. The aim of this scoping review was to understand stressful life events and their relationship with PTSD symptoms, other mental health and/or behavioural problems in individuals with ID-BIF.

Methods

The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

Results

Thirty-eight studies were included. Five studies focused on stressful life events and PTSD symptoms. The other studies examined associations between stressful life events and other mental health and/or behavioural problems. Most of the studies did not clearly differentiate between stressful and traumatic events according to the A criterion of PTSD in the DSM-IV (TR) or DSM-5(TR). Of the six studies in which stressful life events were specified and could be distinguished from traumatic events, one found a positive association between PTSD symptoms and stressful life events and five showed weak to strong positive associations with other mental health and/or behavioural problems.

Conclusions

PTSD symptoms following stressful life events in individuals with ID-BIF are underrepresented in the literature. The lack of a clear definition of stressful life events leads to a gap in the knowledge on whether and how stressful life events may lead to PTSD symptoms, other mental health and/or behavioural problems in individuals with ID-BIF. Therefore, no general conclusions or recommendations can be made regarding the appropriateness of the PTSD A criterion for individuals with ID-BIF. Further research is needed to establish the role of stressful life events in relation to PTSD symptoms and to inform the assessment and effective treatment in people with ID-BIF, as expert clinical experience studies suggest that broadening the PTSD A criterion should be considered for people with ID-BIF.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智障人士的生活压力事件、创伤后应激障碍症状和心理健康:范围界定综述。
背景:应激性生活事件是指不符合 DSM-5(TR)中创伤后应激障碍 A 标准,但被患者视为负面的事件。关于 A 标准作为 PTSD 门槛标准的实用性,特别是关于哪些事件符合创伤性或应激性生活事件的标准,一直存在争论。这一争论对于智障(ID)或边缘智力功能(BIF)患者尤为重要,因为他们似乎比没有智障-边缘智力功能的同龄人更有可能经历创伤性和压力性生活事件,而且似乎更容易受到这些事件的破坏性影响。因此,ID-BIF 患者更容易出现心理健康和行为问题。对于如何解释生活压力事件与创伤后应激障碍症状之间的关系,如何定义和区分 ID 患者的创伤性和生活压力事件,以及是否应扩大 ID-BIF 患者的 A 级标准,目前还缺乏足够的了解。本范围综述旨在了解生活压力事件及其与ID-BIF患者的创伤后应激障碍症状、其他心理健康和/或行为问题之间的关系:范围界定综述根据 JBI 范围界定综述方法和范围界定综述系统综述和荟萃分析扩展首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行:共纳入 38 项研究。其中五项研究侧重于生活压力事件和创伤后应激障碍症状。其他研究则探讨了生活压力事件与其他心理健康和/或行为问题之间的关联。大多数研究并没有根据 DSM-IV(TR)或 DSM-5(TR)中创伤后应激障碍的 A 标准明确区分压力事件和创伤事件。在明确指出生活压力事件并可将其与创伤事件区分开来的六项研究中,一项研究发现创伤后应激障碍症状与生活压力事件呈正相关,五项研究发现创伤后应激障碍症状与其他心理健康和/或行为问题呈弱到强的正相关:结论:ID-BIF 患者在生活压力事件后出现的创伤后应激障碍症状在文献中的代表性不足。由于缺乏对压力性生活事件的明确定义,因此在有关压力性生活事件是否以及如何导致ID-BIF患者出现创伤后应激障碍症状、其他心理健康和/或行为问题的知识方面存在空白。因此,对于创伤后应激障碍A标准是否适合ID-BIF患者,还不能做出一般性结论或建议。专家临床经验研究表明,应考虑为ID-BIF患者扩大创伤后应激障碍A标准的适用范围,因此需要开展进一步研究,以确定应激性生活事件在创伤后应激障碍症状中的作用,并为ID-BIF患者的评估和有效治疗提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Clinical Applicability of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Nutritional Status Prediction in Hospitalized Persons With Severe Motor and Intellectual Disabilities. Issue Information Comparative Analysis of Early Caregiver-Child Interaction Patterns in Infants and Toddlers: Evaluating Down Syndrome vs. Typical Development. Digit-in-Noise Test as a Hearing Screening Test for Individuals With Intellectual Disability. Real-Life Functioning in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome in Relation to Neurocognitive Abilities and Psychotic Symptoms: A Comparison With Idiopathic Schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1