Universal clinical decision support tool for thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: post hoc analysis of the IMPROVE-DD cluster randomized trial

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jtha.2024.07.025
Mark Goldin , Nikolaos Tsaftaridis , Ioannis Koulas , Jeffrey Solomon , Michael Qiu , Tungming Leung , Kolton Smith , Kanta Ochani , Thomas McGinn , Alex C. Spyropoulos
{"title":"Universal clinical decision support tool for thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: post hoc analysis of the IMPROVE-DD cluster randomized trial","authors":"Mark Goldin ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Tsaftaridis ,&nbsp;Ioannis Koulas ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Solomon ,&nbsp;Michael Qiu ,&nbsp;Tungming Leung ,&nbsp;Kolton Smith ,&nbsp;Kanta Ochani ,&nbsp;Thomas McGinn ,&nbsp;Alex C. Spyropoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2024.07.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Inpatient and extended postdischarge thromboprophylaxis of COVID-19 patients remains suboptimal despite antithrombotic guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine whether a novel electronic health record–agnostic clinical decision support (CDS) tool incorporating the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism plus D-dimer (IMPROVE-DD) venous thromboembolism (VTE) scores increases appropriate inpatient and extended postdischarge thromboprophylaxis and improves outcomes in COVID-19 inpatients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This post hoc analysis of the IMPROVE-DD cluster randomized trial evaluated thromboprophylaxis CDS among COVID-19 inpatients at 4 New York hospitals between December 21, 2020, and January 21, 2022. Hospitals were randomized 1:1 to CDS (intervention, <em>n</em> = 2) vs no CDS (usual care, <em>n</em> = 2). The primary outcome was rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included rates of major thromboembolism, all-cause and VTE-related readmissions and death, major bleeding (MB), and all-cause mortality 30 days after discharge.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two thousand four hundred fifty-two COVID-19 inpatients were analyzed (CDS, 1355; no CDS, 1097). Mean age was 73.7 ± 9.37 years; 50.1% of participants were male. CDS adoption was 96.8% (intervention group). CDS was associated with increased appropriate at-discharge extended thromboprophylaxis (42.6% vs 28.8%; odds ratio [OR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.39-2.41; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). CDS was associated with reduced VTE (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.75; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), arterial thromboembolism (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.81; <em>P</em> = .01), total thromboembolism (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36-0.69; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and 30-day all-cause readmission/death (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99; <em>P</em> = .04). There were no differences in MB, VTE-related readmissions/death, or all-cause mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Electronic health record–agnostic CDS incorporating IMPROVE-DD VTE scores had high adoption, was associated with increased appropriate at-discharge extended thromboprophylaxis, and reduced thromboembolism and all-cause readmission/death without increasing MB in COVID-19 inpatients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153878362400446X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Inpatient and extended postdischarge thromboprophylaxis of COVID-19 patients remains suboptimal despite antithrombotic guidelines.

Objectives

To determine whether a novel electronic health record–agnostic clinical decision support (CDS) tool incorporating the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism plus D-dimer (IMPROVE-DD) venous thromboembolism (VTE) scores increases appropriate inpatient and extended postdischarge thromboprophylaxis and improves outcomes in COVID-19 inpatients.

Methods

This post hoc analysis of the IMPROVE-DD cluster randomized trial evaluated thromboprophylaxis CDS among COVID-19 inpatients at 4 New York hospitals between December 21, 2020, and January 21, 2022. Hospitals were randomized 1:1 to CDS (intervention, n = 2) vs no CDS (usual care, n = 2). The primary outcome was rate of appropriate thromboprophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included rates of major thromboembolism, all-cause and VTE-related readmissions and death, major bleeding (MB), and all-cause mortality 30 days after discharge.

Results

Two thousand four hundred fifty-two COVID-19 inpatients were analyzed (CDS, 1355; no CDS, 1097). Mean age was 73.7 ± 9.37 years; 50.1% of participants were male. CDS adoption was 96.8% (intervention group). CDS was associated with increased appropriate at-discharge extended thromboprophylaxis (42.6% vs 28.8%; odds ratio [OR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.39-2.41; P < .001). CDS was associated with reduced VTE (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.75; P < .001), arterial thromboembolism (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.81; P = .01), total thromboembolism (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36-0.69; P < .001), and 30-day all-cause readmission/death (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99; P = .04). There were no differences in MB, VTE-related readmissions/death, or all-cause mortality.

Conclusion

Electronic health record–agnostic CDS incorporating IMPROVE-DD VTE scores had high adoption, was associated with increased appropriate at-discharge extended thromboprophylaxis, and reduced thromboembolism and all-cause readmission/death without increasing MB in COVID-19 inpatients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19住院患者血栓预防的通用临床决策支持工具:IMPROVE-DD 群组随机试验的事后分析。
背景:尽管有抗血栓指南,但COVID-19患者的住院和出院后血栓预防仍不理想:目的:确定一种新型电子健康记录(EHR)诊断性临床决策支持(CDS)工具是否结合了IMPROVE-DD VTE评分,以提高住院患者和出院后延长血栓预防的适当性,并改善COVID-19住院患者的预后:这项 IMPROVE-DD 分组随机试验的事后分析评估了 2020 年 12 月 21 日至 2022 年 1 月 21 日期间纽约四家医院 COVID-19 住院患者的血栓预防 CDS。医院按 1:1 的比例随机接受 CDS(干预,N=2)与不接受 CDS(常规护理,N=2)。主要结果是适当血栓预防率。次要结果包括主要血栓栓塞率、全因和与 VTE 相关的再入院率和死亡率、大出血 (MB) 率以及出院后 30 天的全因死亡率。结果:分析了 2,452 名 COVID-19 住院患者(1,355 名接受 CDS;1,097 名未接受 CDS)。平均年龄为 73.7 ± 9.37 岁;50.1% 的参与者为男性。采用 CDS 的比例为 96.8%(干预组)。CDS 与出院时适当延长血栓预防时间的增加有关(42.6% 对 28.8%,几率比 [OR] 1.83,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.39 - 2.41,p 结论:纳入 IMPROVE-DD VTE 评分的电子病历诊断 CDS 采用率很高,与出院时适当的扩大血栓预防措施增加有关,并在不增加 COVID-19 住院患者 MB 的情况下减少了 TE 和全因再入院/死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
24.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community. Types of Publications: The journal publishes a variety of content, including: Original research reports State-of-the-art reviews Brief reports Case reports Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal Forum articles Correspondence Announcements Scope of Contributions: Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include: Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.
期刊最新文献
Validating International Classification of Diseases Code 10th Revision algorithms for accurate identification of pulmonary embolism. High risk of long-term recurrence after a first episode of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: the REcurrence after a PrEgnAncy related Thrombosis (REPEAT) Study. Validation of clinical risk assessment scores for venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a population-based cohort study. Déjà vu all over again: a recurrent flaw in anticoagulant study design. Intensive FVIII replacement in haemophilia patients with hypertrophic synovium: a randomized study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1