Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19 Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Insights From the Omicron Period.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-08-08 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001690
Leela Morená, Ayman Al Jurdi, Christopher El Mouhayyar, Rucháma Verhoeff, Nora Alzahrani, Camille N Kotton, Leonardo V Riella
{"title":"Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19 Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Insights From the Omicron Period.","authors":"Leela Morená, Ayman Al Jurdi, Christopher El Mouhayyar, Rucháma Verhoeff, Nora Alzahrani, Camille N Kotton, Leonardo V Riella","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), studies investigating post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) are limited, and risk factors for their development require further investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated PASC symptoms among SOTRs followed at our institutions who had COVID-19 during the Omicron period from December 28, 2021, to November 4, 2022. Participants were surveyed using a newly published PASC score containing 13 symptoms experienced for ≥30 d. PASC was defined as a score of ≥12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 299 SOTRs invited, 93 completed the survey and were analyzed. The mean age was 58 y and 43% were women. Forty-six individuals (49%) reported experiencing ≥1 PASC symptom for ≥30 d, of whom 13 (14%) met the PASC definition. Multivariable analysis showed that female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.83), years from transplantation (aOR = 0.90 per additional year; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99), and tixagevimab-cilgavimab preexposure prophylaxis (aOR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12-0.84) were associated with significantly lower odds of developing ≥1 PASC symptom.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PASC symptoms are common in SOTRs infected during the Omicron period. PASC symptoms are less frequent in those with a longer time since transplant and in those who received tixagevimab-cilgavimab. New SARS-CoV-2 prevention and treatment strategies should also evaluate PASC symptoms as outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"10 9","pages":"e1690"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), studies investigating post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) are limited, and risk factors for their development require further investigation.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated PASC symptoms among SOTRs followed at our institutions who had COVID-19 during the Omicron period from December 28, 2021, to November 4, 2022. Participants were surveyed using a newly published PASC score containing 13 symptoms experienced for ≥30 d. PASC was defined as a score of ≥12.

Results: Of 299 SOTRs invited, 93 completed the survey and were analyzed. The mean age was 58 y and 43% were women. Forty-six individuals (49%) reported experiencing ≥1 PASC symptom for ≥30 d, of whom 13 (14%) met the PASC definition. Multivariable analysis showed that female sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.83), years from transplantation (aOR = 0.90 per additional year; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99), and tixagevimab-cilgavimab preexposure prophylaxis (aOR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12-0.84) were associated with significantly lower odds of developing ≥1 PASC symptom.

Conclusions: PASC symptoms are common in SOTRs infected during the Omicron period. PASC symptoms are less frequent in those with a longer time since transplant and in those who received tixagevimab-cilgavimab. New SARS-CoV-2 prevention and treatment strategies should also evaluate PASC symptoms as outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19在实体器官移植受者中的急性后遗症:欧米茄时期的启示
背景:在实体器官移植受者(SOTRs)中,有关 SARS-CoV-2 感染后急性后遗症(PASC)的研究十分有限,需要进一步研究其发生的风险因素:在实体器官移植受者(SOTRs)中,调查 SARS-CoV-2 感染急性后遗症(PASC)的研究非常有限,其发生的风险因素需要进一步调查:在这项横断面研究中,我们评估了在 2021 年 12 月 28 日至 2022 年 11 月 4 日的 Omicron 期间接受过 COVID-19 治疗并在本机构接受随访的 SOTR 的 PASC 症状。我们使用新公布的 PASC 评分对参与者进行了调查,该评分包含 13 种症状,持续时间≥30 d:在受邀的 299 名 SOTR 中,有 93 人完成了调查并接受了分析。平均年龄为 58 岁,43% 为女性。46人(49%)报告说,≥1个PASC症状持续≥30天,其中13人(14%)符合PASC定义。多变量分析显示,女性性别(调整后比值比 [aOR] = 0.32;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.12-0.83)、移植后年数(aOR = 每增加一年 0.90;95% CI,0.81-0.99)和 tixagevimab-cilgavimab 暴露前预防(aOR = 0.33;95% CI,0.12-0.84)与出现≥1 种 PASC 症状的几率显著降低有关:结论:PASC 症状在 Omicron 期间感染的 SOTRs 中很常见。结论:在奥米克隆时期感染的 SOTRs 中,PASC 症状很常见。移植后时间较长的患者和接受过 tixagevimab-cilgavimab 治疗的患者出现 PASC 症状的频率较低。新的 SARS-CoV-2 预防和治疗策略也应将 PASC 症状作为评估结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cardiorespiratory Fitness From Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Is a Comprehensive Risk-stratifying Tool in Liver Transplant Candidates. Critical Considerations for Expanding Indications for Nonvascularized Rectus Fascia Transplantation: Clarifying Definitions, Techniques, and Immunogenicity. First Longitudinal Analysis of the Immunological Mechanism at Play in Uterus Transplantation. Mitigating High-risk EBV and CMV Through Kidney Paired Donation: A Survey of Potential Donor and Recipient Candidates. Outcomes Using High KDPI Kidneys in Recipients Over 65 y of Age.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1