Do high drug prices fund pharmaceutical innovation?

Q3 Medicine Healthcare Management Forum Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1177/08404704241271237
William Lazonick, Öner Tulum
{"title":"Do high drug prices fund pharmaceutical innovation?","authors":"William Lazonick, Öner Tulum","doi":"10.1177/08404704241271237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmaceutical companies claim that they need high drug prices to generate sufficient profits to invest in innovation. While this claim can be valid in principle, it is contradicted by the extent to which \"Big Pharma\" companies in the United States (US) distribute profits to shareholders in the form of cash dividends and stock buybacks. For 2013-2022, the 14 US-based pharmaceutical companies in the S&P 500 Index paid out 54% of net income as dividends and another 51% as buybacks. Incentivizing senior corporate executives to allocate resources in this financialized manner is, as we document, their stock-based compensation. In effect, these companies use high stock prices to boost stock yields at the expense of investing in innovation and compensating workers and taxpayers who make value-creating contributions to the corporation. Given the prominence of US-based pharmaceutical corporations in Canada, we explain how their financialization results in high Canadian drug prices and underinvestment in pharmaceutical research and development in Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"457-461"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704241271237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmaceutical companies claim that they need high drug prices to generate sufficient profits to invest in innovation. While this claim can be valid in principle, it is contradicted by the extent to which "Big Pharma" companies in the United States (US) distribute profits to shareholders in the form of cash dividends and stock buybacks. For 2013-2022, the 14 US-based pharmaceutical companies in the S&P 500 Index paid out 54% of net income as dividends and another 51% as buybacks. Incentivizing senior corporate executives to allocate resources in this financialized manner is, as we document, their stock-based compensation. In effect, these companies use high stock prices to boost stock yields at the expense of investing in innovation and compensating workers and taxpayers who make value-creating contributions to the corporation. Given the prominence of US-based pharmaceutical corporations in Canada, we explain how their financialization results in high Canadian drug prices and underinvestment in pharmaceutical research and development in Canada.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高昂的药价能否为医药创新提供资金?
制药公司声称,它们需要高药价来创造足够的利润,以投资创新。虽然这种说法在原则上可以成立,但美国 "大制药 "公司以现金分红和股票回购的形式向股东分配利润的程度却与此相矛盾。2013-2022 年,标准普尔 500 指数中的 14 家美国制药公司将净收入的 54% 用作股息,51% 用作股票回购。正如我们记录的那样,激励公司高级管理人员以这种金融化方式分配资源的是他们的股票薪酬。实际上,这些公司利用高股价来提高股票收益率,而牺牲了对创新的投资以及对为公司创造价值的工人和纳税人的补偿。鉴于美国制药公司在加拿大的突出地位,我们解释了它们的金融化是如何导致加拿大药品价格居高不下以及加拿大药品研发投资不足的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
期刊最新文献
An ecological approach to humanizing healthcare organizations for patients, healthcare providers, and communities. Integrating informal and formal care: An innovative, scalable program blueprint. From perpetual pilots to sustainable transformation: Scaling up geriatric care. Preventing health care worker burnout in primary care settings through the trauma-informed CARES leadership competency model. Considerations for emergency department virtual triage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1