Lateral extrarticular tenodesis enhances outcomes in primary anterior cruciate ligament repair with knotless anchor: 24-Month minimum follow up

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.005
Yasin Guler , Ahmet Keskin , Hakan Eskara , Bulent Karslıoglu , Yunus İmren , Suleyman Semih Dedeoglu
{"title":"Lateral extrarticular tenodesis enhances outcomes in primary anterior cruciate ligament repair with knotless anchor: 24-Month minimum follow up","authors":"Yasin Guler ,&nbsp;Ahmet Keskin ,&nbsp;Hakan Eskara ,&nbsp;Bulent Karslıoglu ,&nbsp;Yunus İmren ,&nbsp;Suleyman Semih Dedeoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous studies have shown that primary repair of proximal ligament avulsion from the femoral condyle may have reasonable recovery and stability rates after repair. As a result, selecting patients more narrowly and more specifically has been recognized to improve short- and medium-term outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to assess the potential benefits of primary repair for acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with a proximal tear and to evaluate the effect of performing lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) in addition to primary repair on patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was a retrospective cohort study. Thirty-eight patients between the ages of 21 and 40 years who underwent ACL repair surgery within the first 3 weeks after injury due to Sherman type 1 proximal ACL tears were evaluated. Group 1 (<em>n</em> = 18) underwent only primary ACL repair with knotless anchor, while Group 2 (<em>n</em> = 20) had LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary repair. Patients were evaluated using various tests and scoring systems at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in preoperative and postoperative 6- and 12-month visual analog scale (VAS) scores (<em>P</em> &gt;0.05). However, the 24-month VAS score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (<em>P</em> &lt;0.05). The preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (<em>p</em>: 0.004; <em>P</em> &lt;0.05). Group 1 had statistically significantly lower IKDC scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2. Similarly, Group 1 had statistically significantly lower Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) and Tegner–Lysholm scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2 (<em>P</em> &lt;0.05). The occurrence rate of Lachman positivity in the preoperative period was 28.6% in Group 1 and 33.3% in Group 2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study suggests that performing LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary ACL repair may lead to better outcomes in terms of pain relief, knee function, and stability compared with primary ACL repair alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 77-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have shown that primary repair of proximal ligament avulsion from the femoral condyle may have reasonable recovery and stability rates after repair. As a result, selecting patients more narrowly and more specifically has been recognized to improve short- and medium-term outcomes.

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the potential benefits of primary repair for acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with a proximal tear and to evaluate the effect of performing lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) in addition to primary repair on patient outcomes.

Study design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

This study was a retrospective cohort study. Thirty-eight patients between the ages of 21 and 40 years who underwent ACL repair surgery within the first 3 weeks after injury due to Sherman type 1 proximal ACL tears were evaluated. Group 1 (n = 18) underwent only primary ACL repair with knotless anchor, while Group 2 (n = 20) had LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary repair. Patients were evaluated using various tests and scoring systems at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in preoperative and postoperative 6- and 12-month visual analog scale (VAS) scores (P >0.05). However, the 24-month VAS score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (P <0.05). The preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (p: 0.004; P <0.05). Group 1 had statistically significantly lower IKDC scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2. Similarly, Group 1 had statistically significantly lower Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) and Tegner–Lysholm scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2 (P <0.05). The occurrence rate of Lachman positivity in the preoperative period was 28.6% in Group 1 and 33.3% in Group 2.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that performing LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary ACL repair may lead to better outcomes in terms of pain relief, knee function, and stability compared with primary ACL repair alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侧关节外腱鞘切除术提高了使用无结锚进行初级前十字韧带修复的效果:24 个月最短随访。
背景:以往的研究表明,股骨髁近端韧带撕脱的初次修复术后可能会有合理的恢复率和稳定率。目的:本研究旨在评估近端撕裂的急性前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂进行初次修复的潜在益处,并评估在初次修复的基础上进行外侧关节外韧带切开术(LET)对患者预后的影响:研究设计:回顾性队列研究:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究。研究评估了38名年龄在21至40岁之间的患者,他们都是因舍曼1型前交叉韧带近端撕裂而在伤后3周内接受了前交叉韧带修复手术。第一组(18 人)仅接受了无结锚前交叉韧带初次修复手术,而第二组(20 人)则在初次修复手术的基础上接受了髂胫束自体移植前交叉韧带修复手术。患者在术后6、12和24个月时接受了各种测试和评分系统的评估:两组患者术前和术后 6 个月和 12 个月的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。然而,第 1 组 24 个月的 VAS 评分在统计学上明显高于第 2 组(P 结论:第 1 组的 VAS 评分明显高于第 2 组:我们的研究表明,与单纯的前交叉韧带初次修复相比,在前交叉韧带初次修复的基础上进行髂胫束自体移植物 LET 可在疼痛缓解、膝关节功能和稳定性方面取得更好的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Knee
Knee 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry; • Biomechanical studies; • Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices; • Imaging and diagnostic techniques; • Pathology; • Trauma; • Surgery; • Rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Age affects the osteotomy gap filling rate after biplanar medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy without a bone graft. Novel anatomical findings of the superficial medial collateral ligament during knee flexion: Anatomical and histological findings. The degree of patella alta in newborns shows strong correlations with patellofemoral parameters and is influenced by the intrauterine position - An ultrasound-based correlation study. Similarities in the kinematics of autografts and hybrid grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Minimum 2 years of follow-up Clinical outcomes of repaired radial meniscal tears: A retrospective study with minimum 2-year follow-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1