Yasin Guler , Ahmet Keskin , Hakan Eskara , Bulent Karslıoglu , Yunus İmren , Suleyman Semih Dedeoglu
{"title":"Lateral extrarticular tenodesis enhances outcomes in primary anterior cruciate ligament repair with knotless anchor: 24-Month minimum follow up","authors":"Yasin Guler , Ahmet Keskin , Hakan Eskara , Bulent Karslıoglu , Yunus İmren , Suleyman Semih Dedeoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous studies have shown that primary repair of proximal ligament avulsion from the femoral condyle may have reasonable recovery and stability rates after repair. As a result, selecting patients more narrowly and more specifically has been recognized to improve short- and medium-term outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to assess the potential benefits of primary repair for acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with a proximal tear and to evaluate the effect of performing lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) in addition to primary repair on patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was a retrospective cohort study. Thirty-eight patients between the ages of 21 and 40 years who underwent ACL repair surgery within the first 3 weeks after injury due to Sherman type 1 proximal ACL tears were evaluated. Group 1 (<em>n</em> = 18) underwent only primary ACL repair with knotless anchor, while Group 2 (<em>n</em> = 20) had LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary repair. Patients were evaluated using various tests and scoring systems at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in preoperative and postoperative 6- and 12-month visual analog scale (VAS) scores (<em>P</em> >0.05). However, the 24-month VAS score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (<em>P</em> <0.05). The preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (<em>p</em>: 0.004; <em>P</em> <0.05). Group 1 had statistically significantly lower IKDC scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2. Similarly, Group 1 had statistically significantly lower Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) and Tegner–Lysholm scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2 (<em>P</em> <0.05). The occurrence rate of Lachman positivity in the preoperative period was 28.6% in Group 1 and 33.3% in Group 2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study suggests that performing LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary ACL repair may lead to better outcomes in terms of pain relief, knee function, and stability compared with primary ACL repair alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 77-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Previous studies have shown that primary repair of proximal ligament avulsion from the femoral condyle may have reasonable recovery and stability rates after repair. As a result, selecting patients more narrowly and more specifically has been recognized to improve short- and medium-term outcomes.
Purpose
This study aimed to assess the potential benefits of primary repair for acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with a proximal tear and to evaluate the effect of performing lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) in addition to primary repair on patient outcomes.
Study design
Retrospective cohort study.
Methods
This study was a retrospective cohort study. Thirty-eight patients between the ages of 21 and 40 years who underwent ACL repair surgery within the first 3 weeks after injury due to Sherman type 1 proximal ACL tears were evaluated. Group 1 (n = 18) underwent only primary ACL repair with knotless anchor, while Group 2 (n = 20) had LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary repair. Patients were evaluated using various tests and scoring systems at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
Results
There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in preoperative and postoperative 6- and 12-month visual analog scale (VAS) scores (P >0.05). However, the 24-month VAS score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (P <0.05). The preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of Group 1 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 2 (p: 0.004; P <0.05). Group 1 had statistically significantly lower IKDC scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2. Similarly, Group 1 had statistically significantly lower Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) and Tegner–Lysholm scores at postoperative 6, 12, and 24 months than Group 2 (P <0.05). The occurrence rate of Lachman positivity in the preoperative period was 28.6% in Group 1 and 33.3% in Group 2.
Conclusion
Our study suggests that performing LET with iliotibial band autograft in addition to primary ACL repair may lead to better outcomes in terms of pain relief, knee function, and stability compared with primary ACL repair alone.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.