Clinical Assessment of the Nystagmus Fixation Suppression Test: An Experimental Study.

Stefanie Siegrist, Thomas Wyss, Athanasia Korda, Georgios Mantokoudis
{"title":"Clinical Assessment of the Nystagmus Fixation Suppression Test: An Experimental Study.","authors":"Stefanie Siegrist, Thomas Wyss, Athanasia Korda, Georgios Mantokoudis","doi":"10.5152/iao.2024.231249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Assessment of nystagmus fixation suppression can be used as an additional diagnostic tool for patients with an acute vestibular syndrome to distinguish between a central or peripheral cause. We investigated the ability of physicians to detect fixation suppression using a nystagmus simulation model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We used a nystagmus simulator to measure the accuracy of the nystagmus fixation suppression test. Fixation suppression was assessed randomly in 6170 trials by 20 otorhinolaryngologists and neurologists, segregated into 2 groups based on their neurootological experience, a beginner and an experienced group. The simulator presented random nystagmus slow velocity (SPV) reductions and presented 3 conditions with either changed nystagmus frequency, amplitude, or both.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The cutoff for the discernment of fixation suppression ranged from 1.2 to 14°/s nystagmus velocity difference. The more intense the baseline nystagmus was, the more difficult was the detection of fixation suppression. There was not significant difference (P >.05) in the cutoff values in the experts group compared to the novices for all 3 different conditions. Both, novices and experts, detected frequency changes easier than differences of the nystagmus amplitude. Test sensitivity was very low (19%-65%) for discernment of small nystagmus velocity differences of <2°/s by experts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In our study, there was no difference between experts and novices in detection of nystagmus suppression by visual fixation. The examiners could only detect large suppression effects at low-intensity baseline nystagmus. Overall, the sensitivity and accuracy of a clinical fixation suppression test is low and the assistance with a video-oculography device is highly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"20 3","pages":"241-246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.231249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Assessment of nystagmus fixation suppression can be used as an additional diagnostic tool for patients with an acute vestibular syndrome to distinguish between a central or peripheral cause. We investigated the ability of physicians to detect fixation suppression using a nystagmus simulation model.

Methods:  We used a nystagmus simulator to measure the accuracy of the nystagmus fixation suppression test. Fixation suppression was assessed randomly in 6170 trials by 20 otorhinolaryngologists and neurologists, segregated into 2 groups based on their neurootological experience, a beginner and an experienced group. The simulator presented random nystagmus slow velocity (SPV) reductions and presented 3 conditions with either changed nystagmus frequency, amplitude, or both.

Results:  The cutoff for the discernment of fixation suppression ranged from 1.2 to 14°/s nystagmus velocity difference. The more intense the baseline nystagmus was, the more difficult was the detection of fixation suppression. There was not significant difference (P >.05) in the cutoff values in the experts group compared to the novices for all 3 different conditions. Both, novices and experts, detected frequency changes easier than differences of the nystagmus amplitude. Test sensitivity was very low (19%-65%) for discernment of small nystagmus velocity differences of <2°/s by experts.

Conclusion:  In our study, there was no difference between experts and novices in detection of nystagmus suppression by visual fixation. The examiners could only detect large suppression effects at low-intensity baseline nystagmus. Overall, the sensitivity and accuracy of a clinical fixation suppression test is low and the assistance with a video-oculography device is highly recommended.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼球震颤固定抑制试验的临床评估:实验研究。
背景: 眼球震颤固定抑制评估可作为急性前庭综合征患者的额外诊断工具,以区分是中枢性原因还是外周性原因。我们使用眼球震颤模拟模型研究了医生检测固定抑制的能力: 我们使用眼球震颤模拟器来测量眼球震颤固定抑制测试的准确性。20名耳鼻喉科医生和神经科医生在6170次试验中随机评估了眼球定点抑制,根据他们的神经otology经验分为两组,即初学者组和经验丰富组。模拟器随机显示眼球震颤慢速(SPV)减弱的情况,并显示眼球震颤频率、振幅或两者均发生变化的 3 种情况: 结果:定点抑制的分界线在 1.2 到 14°/秒的眼球震颤速度差之间。基线眼球震颤越剧烈,定点抑制的检测就越困难。在所有 3 种不同条件下,专家组与新手组的临界值差异不大(P >.05)。与眼球震颤幅度的差异相比,新手和专家都更容易检测到频率的变化。对结论中眼球震颤速度的微小差异的检测灵敏度非常低(19%-65%): 在我们的研究中,专家和新手在通过视觉固定检测眼球震颤抑制方面没有差异。检查者只能检测到低强度基线眼震的较大抑制作用。总体而言,临床固定抑制测试的灵敏度和准确性都很低,因此强烈建议使用视频眼动仪辅助测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dimensions of Osseous External Auditory Canal in Otosclerosis Using High-Resolution Computed Tomography. Longitudinal Evaluation of Hearing Function in Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Inside Attendants. White Matter Changes in Cases with Unilateral Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Indicated by Diffusion Tensor Imaging Based on Tract-Based Spatial Statistics. Quantifying Residual Hearing Loss from Electrode Insertion Trauma in Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Prospective Double-Blind Study. Inflammatory Pseudotumor of the Temporal Bone and Parapharyngeal Space: A Clinical Case.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1