Clinical Assessment of the Nystagmus Fixation Suppression Test: An Experimental Study.

Stefanie Siegrist, Thomas Wyss, Athanasia Korda, Georgios Mantokoudis
{"title":"Clinical Assessment of the Nystagmus Fixation Suppression Test: An Experimental Study.","authors":"Stefanie Siegrist, Thomas Wyss, Athanasia Korda, Georgios Mantokoudis","doi":"10.5152/iao.2024.231249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Assessment of nystagmus fixation suppression can be used as an additional diagnostic tool for patients with an acute vestibular syndrome to distinguish between a central or peripheral cause. We investigated the ability of physicians to detect fixation suppression using a nystagmus simulation model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We used a nystagmus simulator to measure the accuracy of the nystagmus fixation suppression test. Fixation suppression was assessed randomly in 6170 trials by 20 otorhinolaryngologists and neurologists, segregated into 2 groups based on their neurootological experience, a beginner and an experienced group. The simulator presented random nystagmus slow velocity (SPV) reductions and presented 3 conditions with either changed nystagmus frequency, amplitude, or both.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The cutoff for the discernment of fixation suppression ranged from 1.2 to 14°/s nystagmus velocity difference. The more intense the baseline nystagmus was, the more difficult was the detection of fixation suppression. There was not significant difference (P >.05) in the cutoff values in the experts group compared to the novices for all 3 different conditions. Both, novices and experts, detected frequency changes easier than differences of the nystagmus amplitude. Test sensitivity was very low (19%-65%) for discernment of small nystagmus velocity differences of <2°/s by experts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In our study, there was no difference between experts and novices in detection of nystagmus suppression by visual fixation. The examiners could only detect large suppression effects at low-intensity baseline nystagmus. Overall, the sensitivity and accuracy of a clinical fixation suppression test is low and the assistance with a video-oculography device is highly recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"20 3","pages":"241-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2024.231249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Assessment of nystagmus fixation suppression can be used as an additional diagnostic tool for patients with an acute vestibular syndrome to distinguish between a central or peripheral cause. We investigated the ability of physicians to detect fixation suppression using a nystagmus simulation model.

Methods:  We used a nystagmus simulator to measure the accuracy of the nystagmus fixation suppression test. Fixation suppression was assessed randomly in 6170 trials by 20 otorhinolaryngologists and neurologists, segregated into 2 groups based on their neurootological experience, a beginner and an experienced group. The simulator presented random nystagmus slow velocity (SPV) reductions and presented 3 conditions with either changed nystagmus frequency, amplitude, or both.

Results:  The cutoff for the discernment of fixation suppression ranged from 1.2 to 14°/s nystagmus velocity difference. The more intense the baseline nystagmus was, the more difficult was the detection of fixation suppression. There was not significant difference (P >.05) in the cutoff values in the experts group compared to the novices for all 3 different conditions. Both, novices and experts, detected frequency changes easier than differences of the nystagmus amplitude. Test sensitivity was very low (19%-65%) for discernment of small nystagmus velocity differences of <2°/s by experts.

Conclusion:  In our study, there was no difference between experts and novices in detection of nystagmus suppression by visual fixation. The examiners could only detect large suppression effects at low-intensity baseline nystagmus. Overall, the sensitivity and accuracy of a clinical fixation suppression test is low and the assistance with a video-oculography device is highly recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼球震颤固定抑制试验的临床评估:实验研究。
背景: 眼球震颤固定抑制评估可作为急性前庭综合征患者的额外诊断工具,以区分是中枢性原因还是外周性原因。我们使用眼球震颤模拟模型研究了医生检测固定抑制的能力: 我们使用眼球震颤模拟器来测量眼球震颤固定抑制测试的准确性。20名耳鼻喉科医生和神经科医生在6170次试验中随机评估了眼球定点抑制,根据他们的神经otology经验分为两组,即初学者组和经验丰富组。模拟器随机显示眼球震颤慢速(SPV)减弱的情况,并显示眼球震颤频率、振幅或两者均发生变化的 3 种情况: 结果:定点抑制的分界线在 1.2 到 14°/秒的眼球震颤速度差之间。基线眼球震颤越剧烈,定点抑制的检测就越困难。在所有 3 种不同条件下,专家组与新手组的临界值差异不大(P >.05)。与眼球震颤幅度的差异相比,新手和专家都更容易检测到频率的变化。对结论中眼球震颤速度的微小差异的检测灵敏度非常低(19%-65%): 在我们的研究中,专家和新手在通过视觉固定检测眼球震颤抑制方面没有差异。检查者只能检测到低强度基线眼震的较大抑制作用。总体而言,临床固定抑制测试的灵敏度和准确性都很低,因此强烈建议使用视频眼动仪辅助测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An International Survey of the Diagnosis and Management of Ménière's Disease Amongst Otolaryngology Consultants. Associations of Blood Lipids with the Risk and Prognosis of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Meta-analysis. Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence. Auditory Memory and Visual Memory in Typically Developing Children: Modality Dependence/ Independence. Constant Dizziness Versus Episodic Vertigo in Ménière's Disease: Health-Related Quality of Life, Cognitive Dissonance, and Postural Problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1