Entrepreneurial thinking: rational vs intuitive

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Intellectual Capital Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1108/jic-11-2023-0265
Norris Krueger, Sönke Mestwerdt, Jill Kickul
{"title":"Entrepreneurial thinking: rational vs intuitive","authors":"Norris Krueger, Sönke Mestwerdt, Jill Kickul","doi":"10.1108/jic-11-2023-0265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIntentions are central to entrepreneurial thinking and thus entrepreneurial action yet we have not explored the different pathways of how intent evolves. How does an easily assessed measure of cognitive style influence how entrepreneurs develop their intentions?Design/methodology/approachWe examine how cognitive style interacts with entrepreneurial intentions testing the model separately with subjects scoring as Intuitives or Analytics on cognitive style, plus nationality and gender as covariates with entrepreneurial intensity as a prospective moderator, using 528 university students from Norway, Russia and Finland.FindingsCognitive style does moderate the intentions model. For intuitives, country influenced social norms and entrepreneurial intensity proved a moderator. For analytics, neither perceived desirability, country, nor entrepreneurial intensity were significant.Research limitations/implicationsWe will replicate these findings in different samples, especially non-WEIRD settings. It will also be useful to test alternate measures of cognitive style and other likely moderators.Practical implicationsWe offer diagnostics for educators and ecosystem actors given that our findings suggest intriguing differences in the entrepreneurial mindset.Social implicationsUnderstanding multiple pathways exist to entrepreneurial intent and thus action helps policymakers and entrepreneurial champions better able to help nurture entrepreneurs and thus entrepreneurship in their communities.Originality/valueCognitive style has dramatic effects on the specification of the formal intentions model arguing for multiple pathways to entrepreneurial intent. For example, two entrepreneurs might arrive at the same intention but through very different processes because they differ in cognitive style.","PeriodicalId":48191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Capital","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Capital","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-11-2023-0265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeIntentions are central to entrepreneurial thinking and thus entrepreneurial action yet we have not explored the different pathways of how intent evolves. How does an easily assessed measure of cognitive style influence how entrepreneurs develop their intentions?Design/methodology/approachWe examine how cognitive style interacts with entrepreneurial intentions testing the model separately with subjects scoring as Intuitives or Analytics on cognitive style, plus nationality and gender as covariates with entrepreneurial intensity as a prospective moderator, using 528 university students from Norway, Russia and Finland.FindingsCognitive style does moderate the intentions model. For intuitives, country influenced social norms and entrepreneurial intensity proved a moderator. For analytics, neither perceived desirability, country, nor entrepreneurial intensity were significant.Research limitations/implicationsWe will replicate these findings in different samples, especially non-WEIRD settings. It will also be useful to test alternate measures of cognitive style and other likely moderators.Practical implicationsWe offer diagnostics for educators and ecosystem actors given that our findings suggest intriguing differences in the entrepreneurial mindset.Social implicationsUnderstanding multiple pathways exist to entrepreneurial intent and thus action helps policymakers and entrepreneurial champions better able to help nurture entrepreneurs and thus entrepreneurship in their communities.Originality/valueCognitive style has dramatic effects on the specification of the formal intentions model arguing for multiple pathways to entrepreneurial intent. For example, two entrepreneurs might arrive at the same intention but through very different processes because they differ in cognitive style.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创业思维:理性与直觉
目的意向是创业思维的核心,因此也是创业行动的核心,但我们尚未探索意向演变的不同途径。我们利用来自挪威、俄罗斯和芬兰的 528 名大学生,研究了认知风格与创业意向之间的相互作用,分别测试了认知风格为直觉型或分析型的受试者的模型,以及作为协变量的国籍和性别与创业强度之间的关系。对于直觉型学生来说,国家影响了社会规范,而创业强度则是调节因素。研究局限/意义我们将在不同的样本中,尤其是在非 WEIRD 环境中重复这些发现。社会意义了解创业意向的多种途径,有助于政策制定者和创业倡导者更好地帮助培养创业者,进而在其所在社区开展创业活动。原创性/价值认知风格对正式意向模型的规范有显著影响,证明了创业意向的多种途径。例如,两个创业者可能会达成相同的意向,但由于认知风格不同,其过程也大相径庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Capital is a peer-reviewed international publication dedicated to the exchange of the latest research and best practice information on all aspects of creating, identifying, managing and measuring intellectual capital in organisations. The journal publishes original research and case studies by academic, business and public sector contributors on intellectual capital strategies, approaches, frameworks, tools, techniques and technologies in order to increase the understanding of intellectual capital within the context of the modern knowledge economy. The focus of this journal is on the identification of innovative intellectual capital strategies and the application of theoretical concepts to real-world situations.
期刊最新文献
Do employees with high human capital hide knowledge? Exploring mediation and moderation mechanisms Human–artificial intellectual capital…beyond a fragmented perspective The role of intellectual capital on zakat performance: insight from Indonesia How entrepreneurs engage with feedback during value creation – a taxonomy Entrepreneurial thinking: rational vs intuitive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1