Red deer grazing pressure on agricultural grass meadows from broad to local scale

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY Wildlife Biology Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1002/wlb3.01312
Tilde Katrina Slotte Hjermann, Nikolai Antonsen Bilet, I. M. Rivrud, Erling L. Meisingset, P. Thorvaldsen, A. Mysterud
{"title":"Red deer grazing pressure on agricultural grass meadows from broad to local scale","authors":"Tilde Katrina Slotte Hjermann, Nikolai Antonsen Bilet, I. M. Rivrud, Erling L. Meisingset, P. Thorvaldsen, A. Mysterud","doi":"10.1002/wlb3.01312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grazing by wildlife on agricultural land is widespread across geographical regions, and can cause human–wildlife conflicts due to reduced crop yield when the grazing pressure is high. Growing red deer Cervus elaphus populations in Europe call for an increased understanding of their grazing patterns to mitigate damages. We quantified how red deer grazing pressure (grazing presence and grazing level) on agricultural grass meadows (n = 60) in Norway varied across multiple spatial scales. We used a nested, hierarchical study design transcending from a broad scale (meadows across the landscape) to intermediate (between nearby meadows) and local (within‐meadow) scales, allowing us to identify at which scale the variation in grazing pressure was strongest. We estimated how grazing was determined by broad‐scale factors influencing forage availability and quality through population density, distance to coastline, and differences between the first versus second harvest, by intermediate‐scale factors in terms of meadow management causing differences in botanical composition and quality, and by local‐scale factors in terms of perceived predation risk and disturbance. At a broad scale, higher population densities were associated with higher grazing pressure, and more grazing occurred before the first compared to the second harvest. Intermediate‐scale factors explained the most variation of grazing pressure from red deer, with higher grazing pressure on newly renewed meadows compared to other nearby meadows. On a local scale, more grazing occurred closer to the forest edge, providing cover, and further away from infrastructure, with increased risk and disturbance. Overall, our study highlights how drivers of grazing pressure on agricultural land vary across spatial scales. Population reductions on a broader scale may have some effect in reducing the grazing pressure, but renewed meadows will nevertheless attract red deer, causing higher grazing pressure compared to neighbouring meadows. This insight is crucial for determining effective mitigation strategies facing rising red deer populations across Europe.","PeriodicalId":54405,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grazing by wildlife on agricultural land is widespread across geographical regions, and can cause human–wildlife conflicts due to reduced crop yield when the grazing pressure is high. Growing red deer Cervus elaphus populations in Europe call for an increased understanding of their grazing patterns to mitigate damages. We quantified how red deer grazing pressure (grazing presence and grazing level) on agricultural grass meadows (n = 60) in Norway varied across multiple spatial scales. We used a nested, hierarchical study design transcending from a broad scale (meadows across the landscape) to intermediate (between nearby meadows) and local (within‐meadow) scales, allowing us to identify at which scale the variation in grazing pressure was strongest. We estimated how grazing was determined by broad‐scale factors influencing forage availability and quality through population density, distance to coastline, and differences between the first versus second harvest, by intermediate‐scale factors in terms of meadow management causing differences in botanical composition and quality, and by local‐scale factors in terms of perceived predation risk and disturbance. At a broad scale, higher population densities were associated with higher grazing pressure, and more grazing occurred before the first compared to the second harvest. Intermediate‐scale factors explained the most variation of grazing pressure from red deer, with higher grazing pressure on newly renewed meadows compared to other nearby meadows. On a local scale, more grazing occurred closer to the forest edge, providing cover, and further away from infrastructure, with increased risk and disturbance. Overall, our study highlights how drivers of grazing pressure on agricultural land vary across spatial scales. Population reductions on a broader scale may have some effect in reducing the grazing pressure, but renewed meadows will nevertheless attract red deer, causing higher grazing pressure compared to neighbouring meadows. This insight is crucial for determining effective mitigation strategies facing rising red deer populations across Europe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从大范围到局部范围,红鹿对农用草地的放牧压力
野生动物在农田上放牧的现象在各个地区都很普遍,当放牧压力大时,会导致农作物减产,从而引发人类与野生动物之间的冲突。欧洲的马鹿(Cervus elaphus)数量不断增加,需要进一步了解它们的放牧模式,以减轻损失。我们对红鹿在挪威农用草地(n = 60)上的放牧压力(放牧存在和放牧水平)在多个空间尺度上的变化情况进行了量化。我们采用了一种嵌套式分层研究设计,从大尺度(整个地貌的草地)到中间尺度(附近草地之间)和局部尺度(草地内部),使我们能够确定哪种尺度的放牧压力变化最大。我们估算了以下因素对放牧的决定作用:通过种群密度、与海岸线的距离以及第一次与第二次收获之间的差异影响草料可用性和质量的大尺度因素;草甸管理导致植物组成和质量差异的中间尺度因素;以及捕食风险和干扰感知的局部尺度因素。从广义上讲,较高的种群密度与较高的放牧压力有关,而且与第二次采收相比,第一次采收前的放牧量更大。中间尺度因素解释了红鹿放牧压力的最大变化,与附近其他草地相比,新开垦草地的放牧压力更大。在局部范围内,更多的放牧发生在靠近森林边缘的地方,因为那里提供了遮蔽物,而离基础设施更远的地方则会增加风险和干扰。总之,我们的研究强调了农田放牧压力的驱动因素在不同空间尺度上的差异。在更大范围内减少种群数量可能会在一定程度上减轻放牧压力,但更新的草地仍会吸引赤鹿,造成比邻近草地更高的放牧压力。这一洞察力对于确定有效的缓解策略至关重要,以应对欧洲范围内红鹿数量不断增加的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: WILDLIFE BIOLOGY is a high-quality scientific forum directing concise and up-to-date information to scientists, administrators, wildlife managers and conservationists. The journal encourages and welcomes original papers, short communications and reviews written in English from throughout the world. The journal accepts theoretical, empirical, and practical articles of high standard from all areas of wildlife science with the primary task of creating the scientific basis for the enhancement of wildlife management practices. Our concept of ''wildlife'' mainly includes mammal and bird species, but studies on other species or phenomena relevant to wildlife management are also of great interest. We adopt a broad concept of wildlife management, including all structures and actions with the purpose of conservation, sustainable use, and/or control of wildlife and its habitats, in order to safeguard sustainable relationships between wildlife and other human interests.
期刊最新文献
Red deer grazing pressure on agricultural grass meadows from broad to local scale Wolf diet in the Notecka Forest, western Poland Where is the wolf? A multi‐method comparison of social values and perceptions in a Swiss park The effects of variability in catch effort on the precision of statistical population reconstruction Reaching and implementing the best available knowledge in wildlife biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1