Brain Mechanisms of Oral Multisensory Processing related to Eating: a Systematic Review

C.-S. Lin
{"title":"Brain Mechanisms of Oral Multisensory Processing related to Eating: a Systematic Review","authors":"C.-S. Lin","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.10.24311798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oral functions related to eating, including mastication, swallowing, and taste, are fundamentally a multisensory experience, that relies on the crossmodal interaction of touch, gustation, temperature, pain, and proprioception. While a majority of studies focus on the multisensory processing related to speech, the brain mechanisms of oral multisensory processing related to eating have remained unknown. The current systematic review will summarize the findings from neuroimaging studies (mainly functional magnetic resonance imaging) focusing on the interaction of multiple sensory stimuli in human participants. Neuroimaging studies of human adults on the interaction between multiple sensory stimuli related to oral functions and published in English were identified and extracted via three electronic databases and reviewed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Nine primary studies were eligible to be included in this review. Three studies investigated the interaction of intraoral (i.e., sensorimotor, taste, and noxious) stimuli. Five studies investigated the interaction between intraoral and extraoral (i.e., auditory, olfactory, and visual) stimuli). One study investigated the audio-visual interaction on dental fear. The studies showed great diversity in the experimental design of crossmodal interaction. In terms of the brain features related to the interaction, the somatosensory and motor areas were mostly reported in the studies. The studies imply the potential application between oral neuroscience and oral healthcare, such as prosthodontic treatment and food selection. Still, the findings should be carefully interpreted due to the diversity in crossmodal interaction and inconsistency of experimental design between the studies. The current systematic review revealed that there have not been consistent findings about the underlying brain mechanisms due to the diversity in the experimental design of crossmodal interaction.","PeriodicalId":18505,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":"4 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.10.24311798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oral functions related to eating, including mastication, swallowing, and taste, are fundamentally a multisensory experience, that relies on the crossmodal interaction of touch, gustation, temperature, pain, and proprioception. While a majority of studies focus on the multisensory processing related to speech, the brain mechanisms of oral multisensory processing related to eating have remained unknown. The current systematic review will summarize the findings from neuroimaging studies (mainly functional magnetic resonance imaging) focusing on the interaction of multiple sensory stimuli in human participants. Neuroimaging studies of human adults on the interaction between multiple sensory stimuli related to oral functions and published in English were identified and extracted via three electronic databases and reviewed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Nine primary studies were eligible to be included in this review. Three studies investigated the interaction of intraoral (i.e., sensorimotor, taste, and noxious) stimuli. Five studies investigated the interaction between intraoral and extraoral (i.e., auditory, olfactory, and visual) stimuli). One study investigated the audio-visual interaction on dental fear. The studies showed great diversity in the experimental design of crossmodal interaction. In terms of the brain features related to the interaction, the somatosensory and motor areas were mostly reported in the studies. The studies imply the potential application between oral neuroscience and oral healthcare, such as prosthodontic treatment and food selection. Still, the findings should be carefully interpreted due to the diversity in crossmodal interaction and inconsistency of experimental design between the studies. The current systematic review revealed that there have not been consistent findings about the underlying brain mechanisms due to the diversity in the experimental design of crossmodal interaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与进食有关的口腔多感官处理的大脑机制:系统综述
与进食有关的口腔功能,包括咀嚼、吞咽和味觉,从根本上说是一种多感官体验,依赖于触觉、味觉、温度、疼痛和本体感觉的跨模态相互作用。虽然大多数研究都集中在与言语相关的多感官处理上,但与进食相关的口腔多感官处理的大脑机制却一直不为人知。本系统综述将总结神经影像学研究(主要是功能性磁共振成像)的结果,这些研究侧重于人类参与者多种感官刺激的相互作用。我们通过三个电子数据库识别和提取了以人类成年人为对象的、与口腔功能相关的多种感觉刺激之间相互作用的神经成像研究,并根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》进行了审查。有九项主要研究符合纳入本综述的条件。三项研究调查了口内(即感觉运动、味觉和有害)刺激之间的相互作用。五项研究调查了口内和口外(即听觉、嗅觉和视觉)刺激之间的相互作用。)一项研究调查了视听刺激对牙齿恐惧的影响。这些研究显示,跨模态交互作用的实验设计存在很大差异。就与互动相关的大脑特征而言,研究报告大多涉及躯体感觉区和运动区。这些研究意味着口腔神经科学与口腔保健(如修复治疗和食物选择)之间的潜在应用。尽管如此,由于跨模态相互作用的多样性以及不同研究之间实验设计的不一致性,这些研究结果仍需谨慎解读。目前的系统综述显示,由于跨模态交互实验设计的多样性,有关大脑潜在机制的研究结果并不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors determining hemoglobin levels in vaginally delivered term newborns at public hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia Accurate and cost-efficient whole genome sequencing of hepatitis B virus using Nanopore Mapping Epigenetic Gene Variant Dynamics: Comparative Analysis of Frequency, Functional Impact and Trait Associations in African and European Populations Assessing Population-level Accessibility to Medical College Hospitals in India: A Geospatial Modeling Study Targeted inference to identify drug repositioning candidates in the Danish health registries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1