Comparison of Fibrosis-4 with FibroScan for Liver Fibrosis Assessment in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients: A Cross-sectional Study

Fahad Kakar, A. Siddiqui, S. Niaz, Syed Afzal ul Haq Haqqi, Zea ul Islam Farrukh, Muhammad Danish Ashraf Wallam, Muhammad Umar Farooq, Sayed Rohail Ahmed Rizvi
{"title":"Comparison of Fibrosis-4 with FibroScan for Liver Fibrosis Assessment in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients: A Cross-sectional Study","authors":"Fahad Kakar, A. Siddiqui, S. Niaz, Syed Afzal ul Haq Haqqi, Zea ul Islam Farrukh, Muhammad Danish Ashraf Wallam, Muhammad Umar Farooq, Sayed Rohail Ahmed Rizvi","doi":"10.36570/jduhs.2024.2.2167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy and accuracy of the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index with FibroScan in assessing liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Patel Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from October 2023 to April 2024. All known cases of NAFLD or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) aged ≥18 years, regardless of gender, were included. FIB-4 scores were measured using age, platelet level, aspartate transaminase (AST), and alanine transaminase (ALT). FibroScan categorized liver fibrosis into stages F0 to F4 with specific stiffness ranges: F0 (1–6 kPa), F1 (6.1–7 kPa), F2 (7.1–9 kPa), F3 (9.1–10.3 kPa), and F4 (≥10.4 kPa). Results: Of the 146 patients, the median age was 52.00 (IQR: 47.00–54.00) years. Based on FibroScan results, 61 (41.8%) patients were classified as F1, 35 (24.0%) as F2, 30 (20.5%) as F3, and 20 (13.7%) as F4. The diagnostic performance of FIB-4 showed an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76–0.90). The optimal cut-off for FIB-4 was 1.28 with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 98.0%, 65.6%, 59.7%, 98.4%, and 76.7%, respectively. Spearman's correlation test (ρ) was applied and a significantly moderate correlation was found between FibroScan and FIB-4 (ρ = 0.50, p < 0.001). Conclusion: FIB-4 demonstrated higher accuracy and diagnostic performance in determining liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients compared to FibroScan.","PeriodicalId":34119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36570/jduhs.2024.2.2167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and accuracy of the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index with FibroScan in assessing liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Patel Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from October 2023 to April 2024. All known cases of NAFLD or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) aged ≥18 years, regardless of gender, were included. FIB-4 scores were measured using age, platelet level, aspartate transaminase (AST), and alanine transaminase (ALT). FibroScan categorized liver fibrosis into stages F0 to F4 with specific stiffness ranges: F0 (1–6 kPa), F1 (6.1–7 kPa), F2 (7.1–9 kPa), F3 (9.1–10.3 kPa), and F4 (≥10.4 kPa). Results: Of the 146 patients, the median age was 52.00 (IQR: 47.00–54.00) years. Based on FibroScan results, 61 (41.8%) patients were classified as F1, 35 (24.0%) as F2, 30 (20.5%) as F3, and 20 (13.7%) as F4. The diagnostic performance of FIB-4 showed an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76–0.90). The optimal cut-off for FIB-4 was 1.28 with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 98.0%, 65.6%, 59.7%, 98.4%, and 76.7%, respectively. Spearman's correlation test (ρ) was applied and a significantly moderate correlation was found between FibroScan and FIB-4 (ρ = 0.50, p < 0.001). Conclusion: FIB-4 demonstrated higher accuracy and diagnostic performance in determining liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients compared to FibroScan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较 Fibrosis-4 和 FibroScan 对非酒精性脂肪肝患者肝纤维化的评估:横断面研究
目的比较纤维化-4(FIB-4)指数与 FibroScan 在评估非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)患者肝纤维化方面的有效性和准确性。研究方法这项横断面研究于 2023 年 10 月至 2024 年 4 月在巴基斯坦卡拉奇帕特尔医院进行。所有年龄≥18 岁的非酒精性脂肪肝或非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)已知病例,不分性别,均被纳入研究范围。使用年龄、血小板水平、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)和丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)测量 FIB-4 评分。FibroScan 将肝纤维化分为 F0 至 F4 期,并有特定的硬度范围:F0(1-6 千帕)、F1(6.1-7 千帕)、F2(7.1-9 千帕)、F3(9.1-10.3 千帕)和 F4(≥10.4 千帕)。结果:146 名患者的中位年龄为 52.00(IQR:47.00-54.00)岁。根据纤维扫描结果,61 例(41.8%)患者被归类为 F1,35 例(24.0%)被归类为 F2,30 例(20.5%)被归类为 F3,20 例(13.7%)被归类为 F4。FIB-4 的诊断性能曲线下面积为 0.83(95% CI:0.76-0.90)。FIB-4 的最佳临界值为 1.28,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和总体诊断准确率分别为 98.0%、65.6%、59.7%、98.4% 和 76.7%。应用斯皮尔曼相关性检验(ρ)发现,FibroScan 和 FIB-4 之间存在明显的中度相关性(ρ = 0.50,P < 0.001)。结论:FIB-4与 FibroScan 相比,FIB-4 在确定非酒精性脂肪肝患者肝纤维化方面表现出更高的准确性和诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences
Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factors Affecting the Quality of Life among the Aging Population during the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic in Thailand Objectivity in a Subjective Field: The Current State and Future Directions of “Objective” Diagnostics in Psychiatry Delayed Recurrence of Mandibular Ameloblastoma in Soft Tissues of Neck: A Case Report of a Rare Entity Efficacy of Azithromycin and Meropenem in Pediatric XDR Salmonella Typhi: A Retrospective Study from Abbottabad, Pakistan Needle Threat and Acquired Dental Phobia in Pediatric Dental Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1