The fractions skill score for ensemble forecast verification

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1002/qj.4824
Tobias Necker, Ludwig Wolfgruber, Lukas Kugler, Martin Weissmann, Manfred Dorninger, Stefano Serafin
{"title":"The fractions skill score for ensemble forecast verification","authors":"Tobias Necker, Ludwig Wolfgruber, Lukas Kugler, Martin Weissmann, Manfred Dorninger, Stefano Serafin","doi":"10.1002/qj.4824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fractions skill score (FSS) is a neighbourhood verification method originally designed to verify deterministic forecasts of binary events. Previous studies employed different approaches for computing an ensemble‐based FSS for probabilistic forecast verification. We show that the formulation of an ensemble‐based FSS substantially affects verification results. Comparing four possible approaches, we determine how different ensemble‐based FSS variants depend on ensemble size, neighbourhood size, and forecast event frequency of occurrence. We demonstrate that only one ensemble‐based FSS, which we call the probabilistic FSS (pFSS), is well behaved and reasonably dependent on ensemble size. Furthermore, we derive a relationship to describe how the pFSS behaves with ensemble size. The proposed relationship is similar to a known result for the Brier skill score. Our study uses high‐resolution 1000‐member ensemble precipitation forecasts from a high‐impact weather period. The large ensemble enables us to study the influence of ensemble and neighbourhood size on forecast skill by deriving probabilistic skilful spatial scales.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The fractions skill score (FSS) is a neighbourhood verification method originally designed to verify deterministic forecasts of binary events. Previous studies employed different approaches for computing an ensemble‐based FSS for probabilistic forecast verification. We show that the formulation of an ensemble‐based FSS substantially affects verification results. Comparing four possible approaches, we determine how different ensemble‐based FSS variants depend on ensemble size, neighbourhood size, and forecast event frequency of occurrence. We demonstrate that only one ensemble‐based FSS, which we call the probabilistic FSS (pFSS), is well behaved and reasonably dependent on ensemble size. Furthermore, we derive a relationship to describe how the pFSS behaves with ensemble size. The proposed relationship is similar to a known result for the Brier skill score. Our study uses high‐resolution 1000‐member ensemble precipitation forecasts from a high‐impact weather period. The large ensemble enables us to study the influence of ensemble and neighbourhood size on forecast skill by deriving probabilistic skilful spatial scales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于验证集合预报的分数技能得分
分数技能得分(FSS)是一种邻域验证方法,最初设计用于验证二元事件的确定性预测。以往的研究采用不同的方法计算基于集合的 FSS,用于概率预测验证。我们的研究表明,基于集合的 FSS 的计算方法会对验证结果产生重大影响。通过比较四种可能的方法,我们确定了不同的基于集合的 FSS 变体如何取决于集合规模、邻域规模和预测事件发生频率。我们证明,只有一种基于集合的 FSS(我们称之为概率 FSS(pFSS))表现良好,并且合理地依赖于集合规模。此外,我们还推导出一种关系来描述 pFSS 如何随集合规模而变化。所提出的关系类似于已知的布赖尔技能得分结果。我们的研究使用了高影响天气时期的高分辨率 1000 成员集合降水预报。大型集合使我们能够通过推导概率娴熟空间尺度来研究集合和邻域规模对预报技能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
期刊最新文献
Multivariate post‐processing of probabilistic sub‐seasonal weather regime forecasts Relationship between vertical variation of cloud microphysical properties and thickness of the entrainment interfacial layer in Physics of Stratocumulus Top stratocumulus clouds Characteristics and trends of Atlantic tropical cyclones that do and do not develop from African easterly waves Teleconnection and the Antarctic response to the Indian Ocean Dipole in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models First trial for the assimilation of radiance data from MTVZA‐GY on board the new Russian satellite meteor‐M N2‐2 in the CMA‐GFS 4D‐VAR system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1