Balancing boat‐electrofishing sampling effort against costs for nearshore fish communities in the Toronto waterfront, Lake Ontario

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Fisheries Management and Ecology Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1111/fme.12733
S. Theis, Angela Wallace, Brian Graham, Brynn Coey, Lyndsay Cartwright, M. Poesch, Rick Portiss, Jonathan L. W. Ruppert
{"title":"Balancing boat‐electrofishing sampling effort against costs for nearshore fish communities in the Toronto waterfront, Lake Ontario","authors":"S. Theis, Angela Wallace, Brian Graham, Brynn Coey, Lyndsay Cartwright, M. Poesch, Rick Portiss, Jonathan L. W. Ruppert","doi":"10.1111/fme.12733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To enhance management of aquatic systems, long‐term monitoring programs are crucial. However, managers often lack sufficient guidance in decision‐making. In this study, we analyzed nearshore electrofishing data from Lake Ontario spanning 18 years and over 100,000 caught fish to assess sampling designs for various coastal habitats. Using simulation, we evaluated precision of catch per unit effort (CPUE) for all species, piscivores, and specialist species, at different levels of electrofishing sampling effort. For overall CPUE in any habitat type, increased precision declined with additional electrofishing runs, particularly after reaching 30–40 runs. Adjustments in sampling effort, such as adding 10 runs per year for open‐coast sites, increased precision of overall CPUE by 10%. Adding 8 runs per year for wetlands increased precision of specialist‐species CPUE by 10%. However, additional runs in embayments did not increase precision for all species, piscivores, or specialist species. Our findings underscore the importance of considering community composition and abundance when evaluating CPUE precision and illustrates a flexible approach to optimize sampling effort in aquatic monitoring programs.","PeriodicalId":50444,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Management and Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Management and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To enhance management of aquatic systems, long‐term monitoring programs are crucial. However, managers often lack sufficient guidance in decision‐making. In this study, we analyzed nearshore electrofishing data from Lake Ontario spanning 18 years and over 100,000 caught fish to assess sampling designs for various coastal habitats. Using simulation, we evaluated precision of catch per unit effort (CPUE) for all species, piscivores, and specialist species, at different levels of electrofishing sampling effort. For overall CPUE in any habitat type, increased precision declined with additional electrofishing runs, particularly after reaching 30–40 runs. Adjustments in sampling effort, such as adding 10 runs per year for open‐coast sites, increased precision of overall CPUE by 10%. Adding 8 runs per year for wetlands increased precision of specialist‐species CPUE by 10%. However, additional runs in embayments did not increase precision for all species, piscivores, or specialist species. Our findings underscore the importance of considering community composition and abundance when evaluating CPUE precision and illustrates a flexible approach to optimize sampling effort in aquatic monitoring programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡安大略湖多伦多海滨近岸鱼类群落的渔船电鱼取样工作与成本之间的关系
为了加强对水生系统的管理,长期监测计划至关重要。然而,管理者往往缺乏足够的决策指导。在这项研究中,我们分析了安大略湖 18 年来的近岸电鱼数据和超过 10 万条捕获的鱼类,以评估各种沿岸生境的取样设计。通过模拟,我们评估了在不同的电鱼取样强度下,所有物种、食鱼类和专门物种的单位努力量捕获量(CPUE)的精度。对于任何生境类型中的总体 CPUE,随着电鱼次数的增加,精度的提高会下降,特别是在达到 30-40 次之后。调整取样力度,例如在开阔海岸地点每年增加 10 次取样,CPUE 的总体精度提高了 10%。在湿地每年增加 8 次取样,可使特殊物种 CPUE 的精确度提高 10%。然而,在堤坝增加运行次数并没有提高所有物种、食鱼类或专门物种的精确度。我们的发现强调了在评估 CPUE 精度时考虑群落组成和丰度的重要性,并说明了在水生监测计划中优化取样工作的灵活方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fisheries Management and Ecology
Fisheries Management and Ecology 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Fisheries Management and Ecology is a journal with an international perspective. It presents papers that cover all aspects of the management, ecology and conservation of inland, estuarine and coastal fisheries. The Journal aims to: foster an understanding of the maintenance, development and management of the conditions under which fish populations and communities thrive, and how they and their habitat can be conserved and enhanced; promote a thorough understanding of the dual nature of fisheries as valuable resources exploited for food, recreational and commercial purposes and as pivotal indicators of aquatic habitat quality and conservation status; help fisheries managers focus upon policy, management, operational, conservation and ecological issues; assist fisheries ecologists become more aware of the needs of managers for information, techniques, tools and concepts; integrate ecological studies with all aspects of management; ensure that the conservation of fisheries and their environments is a recurring theme in fisheries and aquatic management.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information KRILLSCAN: An automated open‐source software for processing and analysis of echosounder data from the Antarctic krill fishery Differences in fisher demographics and fishing behaviour from concurrent phone‐recall and smartphone app surveys of recreational angling in south‐western Australia Effectiveness of mass marking of juvenile sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) with alizarin red S stain on field detection A Delphi‐study to identify drivers of future angling participation in five Nordic countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1