Accurate Fake News Prediction by Comparing Performance of Machine learning algorithms

Akilandasowmya.G, Gauthami Ghadiyaram, M. Pavetha, S.P. Hemamalini
{"title":"Accurate Fake News Prediction by Comparing Performance of Machine learning algorithms","authors":"Akilandasowmya.G, Gauthami Ghadiyaram, M. Pavetha, S.P. Hemamalini","doi":"10.47392/irjaeh.2024.0299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advancement of technology and the widespread use of media there has been an increase, in the circulation of fake news. Unfortunately, some individuals intentionally spread information to manipulate opinion and drive traffic to specific websites. One such instance occurred during the Covid 19 pandemic when misleading rumors started circulating falsely claiming that Covid vaccines were linked to heart attacks and infertility. These baseless claims created hesitancy among people regarding vaccination. To assist individuals in identifying news accurately this paper compares the performance of various machine learning algorithms such as Passive Aggressive Classifier, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes. After evaluating their results, it was determined that the Passive Aggressive Classifier achieved an accuracy rate of 98.2% followed by Naïve Bayes with 96.59% accuracy Random Forest with 96.95% accuracy, Decision Tree with 96.23% accuracy and Logistic Regression with 97.22% accuracy. Based on these findings it can be concluded that the Passive Aggressive Classifier is the algorithm for predicting fake news among all five models tested in this study. The data used for building these machine learning models was obtained from Kaggle website. The primary objective of this research paper is to provide guidance to individuals seeking to choose an algorithm that offers accuracy, in detecting news.","PeriodicalId":517766,"journal":{"name":"International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub (IRJAEH)","volume":"41 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub (IRJAEH)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47392/irjaeh.2024.0299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the advancement of technology and the widespread use of media there has been an increase, in the circulation of fake news. Unfortunately, some individuals intentionally spread information to manipulate opinion and drive traffic to specific websites. One such instance occurred during the Covid 19 pandemic when misleading rumors started circulating falsely claiming that Covid vaccines were linked to heart attacks and infertility. These baseless claims created hesitancy among people regarding vaccination. To assist individuals in identifying news accurately this paper compares the performance of various machine learning algorithms such as Passive Aggressive Classifier, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression and Naïve Bayes. After evaluating their results, it was determined that the Passive Aggressive Classifier achieved an accuracy rate of 98.2% followed by Naïve Bayes with 96.59% accuracy Random Forest with 96.95% accuracy, Decision Tree with 96.23% accuracy and Logistic Regression with 97.22% accuracy. Based on these findings it can be concluded that the Passive Aggressive Classifier is the algorithm for predicting fake news among all five models tested in this study. The data used for building these machine learning models was obtained from Kaggle website. The primary objective of this research paper is to provide guidance to individuals seeking to choose an algorithm that offers accuracy, in detecting news.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过比较机器学习算法的性能准确预测假新闻
随着技术的进步和媒体的广泛使用,假新闻的传播也越来越多。不幸的是,有些人故意散布信息来操纵舆论,并将流量引向特定网站。在 Covid 19 大流行期间就出现了这样一个例子,当时开始流传误导性谣言,谎称 Covid 疫苗与心脏病发作和不孕症有关。这些毫无根据的说法让人们对接种疫苗产生了犹豫。为了帮助人们准确识别新闻,本文比较了各种机器学习算法的性能,如被动攻击分类器、决策树、随机森林、逻辑回归和奈夫贝叶斯。评估结果表明,被动攻击型分类器的准确率为 98.2%,其次是 Naïve Bayes(准确率为 96.59%)、Random Forest(准确率为 96.95%)、决策树(准确率为 96.23%)和 Logistic Regression(准确率为 97.22%)。根据这些发现可以得出结论,在本研究测试的所有五个模型中,被动攻击分类器是预测假新闻的算法。用于构建这些机器学习模型的数据来自 Kaggle 网站。本研究论文的主要目的是为个人提供指导,帮助他们选择一种能准确检测新闻的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Load Balancing in Cloud Computing: Improving Efficiency and Performance in Real Life Applications Optimizing Renewable Energy Integration in Green Building Projects: Addressing Barriers and Enhancing Energy Performance Drone Technology in Construction Industry Addressing Workplace Harassment and Discrimination: Strategies for Creating Inclusive Environments in Construction Engineering Smart Plant Health Control System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1