Advancing the Future of Equitable Access to Health Care: Recommendations from International Health Care Leaders

Beth Boyer, Katie Huber, Eyal Zimlichman, Robert S Saunders, Mark McClellan, Charles N. Kahn, Ryan Noach, Claudia Salzberg
{"title":"Advancing the Future of Equitable Access to Health Care: Recommendations from International Health Care Leaders","authors":"Beth Boyer, Katie Huber, Eyal Zimlichman, Robert S Saunders, Mark McClellan, Charles N. Kahn, Ryan Noach, Claudia Salzberg","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Disparities in access to health care are persistent and contribute to poor health outcomes for many populations around the world. Barriers to access are often similar across countries, despite differences in how health systems are structured. Health care leaders can work to address these barriers through bold, evidence-based actions. The Future of Health (FOH), an international community of senior health leaders, collaborated with the Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy to identify priority organizational and policy actions needed to improve equitable access to health care through a consensus-building exercise, a targeted literature review, and an expert discussion group. This paper describes four key action areas for health care leaders that FOH members identified as critical to enabling the future of equitable access to health care: ensuring prioritization of and accountability for equitable access to care; establishing comprehensive, organization-wide strategies to address barriers to access; clearly defining and incentivizing improvement on key measures related to reducing disparities in access; and establishing cross-sector partnerships to improve equitable access.","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"16 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disparities in access to health care are persistent and contribute to poor health outcomes for many populations around the world. Barriers to access are often similar across countries, despite differences in how health systems are structured. Health care leaders can work to address these barriers through bold, evidence-based actions. The Future of Health (FOH), an international community of senior health leaders, collaborated with the Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy to identify priority organizational and policy actions needed to improve equitable access to health care through a consensus-building exercise, a targeted literature review, and an expert discussion group. This paper describes four key action areas for health care leaders that FOH members identified as critical to enabling the future of equitable access to health care: ensuring prioritization of and accountability for equitable access to care; establishing comprehensive, organization-wide strategies to address barriers to access; clearly defining and incentivizing improvement on key measures related to reducing disparities in access; and establishing cross-sector partnerships to improve equitable access.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进公平获得医疗服务的未来:国际医疗保健领导人的建议
获得医疗服务方面的差距长期存在,导致世界各地许多人的健康状况不佳。尽管各国医疗系统的结构不同,但获得医疗服务的障碍往往相似。医疗保健领导者可以通过大胆的、以证据为基础的行动来消除这些障碍。健康的未来(FOH)是一个由资深卫生领袖组成的国际社区,它与杜克大学马戈利斯卫生政策研究所合作,通过建立共识、有针对性的文献回顾和专家讨论小组,确定了改善公平获得医疗服务所需的优先组织和政策行动。本文介绍了 FOH 成员为医疗保健领导者确定的四个关键行动领域,这四个领域对于实现未来公平获得医疗保健服务至关重要:确保优先考虑公平获得医疗保健服务并对其负责;建立全面的、全组织范围的战略,以解决获得医疗保健服务的障碍;明确界定并激励改善与减少获得医疗保健服务差距相关的关键措施;以及建立跨部门合作伙伴关系,以改善公平获得医疗保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: No Surprises Act independent dispute resolution outcomes for emergency services. All-cause nursing home mortality rates have remained above pre-pandemic levels after accounting for decline in occupancy. Charting new territory: the early lessons in integrating social determinant of health (SDOH) measures into practice. Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States. Examining the use of telehealth to initiate buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1