Evaluation of e-Lung automated quantitative CT biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00570-2024
Peter M. George, C. Rennison-Jones, Giacomo Benvenuti, Aliki Sifostratoudaki, F. Ottink, W. Bou-Zeid, Roberta Eufrasia Ledda, Roqia Fatmawati, Abul Kadir, Bushra Johari, C. Fernandez, G. Harston, O. Joly, S. Gerry, A. Devaraj
{"title":"Evaluation of e-Lung automated quantitative CT biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis","authors":"Peter M. George, C. Rennison-Jones, Giacomo Benvenuti, Aliki Sifostratoudaki, F. Ottink, W. Bou-Zeid, Roberta Eufrasia Ledda, Roqia Fatmawati, Abul Kadir, Bushra Johari, C. Fernandez, G. Harston, O. Joly, S. Gerry, A. Devaraj","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00570-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), there is a need to identify biomarkers that i) are associated with increased risk of adverse outcome and ii) can be used to monitor treatment response or identify disease progression over time.Two consecutive cohorts of patients with IPF were accessed from the Open Source Imaging Consortium database. Automated CT biomarkers of disease severity incorporating fibrotic and pulmonary vascular features (the reticulovascular score and weighted reticulovascular score (WRVS)), were studied. Relationships between imaging biomarkers, lung function and survival were analysed.In separate test and validation cohorts, 168 and 176 patients with IPF respectively (median survival 2.6 years) were studied. A threshold of WRVS ≥15% at baseline CT was most strongly associated with transplant free survival (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.47, 6.10, p=0.002) when adjusted for baseline FVC and age. In patients with 12 month follow up CT and lung function tests (n=89) an increase in 3% of WRVS (the minimal clinically important difference) was also significantly associated with reduced survival independent of FVC, and outperformed visual evaluation of progressive fibrosis.WRVS is an automated CT biomarker which can identify patients with IPF at increased risk of progression and is able to reliably capture disease progression over time.","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00570-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), there is a need to identify biomarkers that i) are associated with increased risk of adverse outcome and ii) can be used to monitor treatment response or identify disease progression over time.Two consecutive cohorts of patients with IPF were accessed from the Open Source Imaging Consortium database. Automated CT biomarkers of disease severity incorporating fibrotic and pulmonary vascular features (the reticulovascular score and weighted reticulovascular score (WRVS)), were studied. Relationships between imaging biomarkers, lung function and survival were analysed.In separate test and validation cohorts, 168 and 176 patients with IPF respectively (median survival 2.6 years) were studied. A threshold of WRVS ≥15% at baseline CT was most strongly associated with transplant free survival (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.47, 6.10, p=0.002) when adjusted for baseline FVC and age. In patients with 12 month follow up CT and lung function tests (n=89) an increase in 3% of WRVS (the minimal clinically important difference) was also significantly associated with reduced survival independent of FVC, and outperformed visual evaluation of progressive fibrosis.WRVS is an automated CT biomarker which can identify patients with IPF at increased risk of progression and is able to reliably capture disease progression over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估特发性肺纤维化中的 e-Lung 自动定量 CT 生物标记物
在特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者中,有必要确定以下生物标志物:i)与不良预后风险增加相关;ii)可用于监测治疗反应或确定疾病随时间的进展。研究人员从开源成像联盟数据库中获取了两个连续的 IPF 患者队列,研究了包含纤维化和肺血管特征的疾病严重程度自动 CT 生物标志物(网状血管评分和加权网状血管评分 (WRVS))。分别对 168 名和 176 名 IPF 患者(中位生存期为 2.6 年)进行了测试和验证。在对基线FVC和年龄进行调整后,基线CT时WRVS≥15%的阈值与无移植生存率的关系最为密切(HR 3.00,95% CI 1.47,6.10,p=0.002)。在接受12个月CT和肺功能检查的患者(89人)中,WRVS增加3%(最小临床重要差异)也与生存率降低显著相关,而与FVC无关,并且优于进行性纤维化的目测评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
期刊最新文献
Assessing post-COVID-19 respiratory dynamics: a comprehensive analysis of pulmonary function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchodilator response. Cognitive interference of respiratory versus limb muscle dual tasking in healthy adults. Corticosteroid therapy in fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a modified Delphi survey. Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for post-sepsis frailty. High-flow humidified oxygen as an early intervention in children with acute severe asthma: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1