Vibration as a New Survey Method for Spiders

Animals Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.3390/ani14162307
Rachael Harris, Robert Raven, Andrew Maxwell, Peter J. Murray
{"title":"Vibration as a New Survey Method for Spiders","authors":"Rachael Harris, Robert Raven, Andrew Maxwell, Peter J. Murray","doi":"10.3390/ani14162307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spiders have important ecological roles as generalist predators, are a significant source of food for many other species, and are bioindicators of environmental health. However, spiders are poorly studied. Given their importance, a comparison of spider survey methods used to determine differences in spider diversity and abundance is required to understand their limitations and biases. A new survey method to attract spiders, based on vibration from an idling diesel tractor, was tested and compared to the traditional methods of pitfall trapping and hand collection of spiders at night. Across the three survey methods, there were, in total, 2294 spiders in 34 families, 138 genera, and 226 species identified. Spider species diversity and richness were significantly greater for spiders collected at night than from the other two methods (spiders collected in pitfall traps and attracted to vibration). The collection of spiders using the night collection and vibration-based methods were very similar in terms of labor required and material costs. Of all spider species identified, 80% were captured during hand collection, 30% through pitfall trapping, and 30% from vibration-based collection. Most species of spiders caught in pitfall traps were species known to be primarily ground-dwelling, whereas both arboreal and ground-dwelling spiders were collected at night and as a result of being attracted and collected using the vibration-based method.","PeriodicalId":502248,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"34 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spiders have important ecological roles as generalist predators, are a significant source of food for many other species, and are bioindicators of environmental health. However, spiders are poorly studied. Given their importance, a comparison of spider survey methods used to determine differences in spider diversity and abundance is required to understand their limitations and biases. A new survey method to attract spiders, based on vibration from an idling diesel tractor, was tested and compared to the traditional methods of pitfall trapping and hand collection of spiders at night. Across the three survey methods, there were, in total, 2294 spiders in 34 families, 138 genera, and 226 species identified. Spider species diversity and richness were significantly greater for spiders collected at night than from the other two methods (spiders collected in pitfall traps and attracted to vibration). The collection of spiders using the night collection and vibration-based methods were very similar in terms of labor required and material costs. Of all spider species identified, 80% were captured during hand collection, 30% through pitfall trapping, and 30% from vibration-based collection. Most species of spiders caught in pitfall traps were species known to be primarily ground-dwelling, whereas both arboreal and ground-dwelling spiders were collected at night and as a result of being attracted and collected using the vibration-based method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将振动作为一种新的蜘蛛调查方法
蜘蛛在生态学中扮演着重要的角色,它是通性捕食者,是许多其他物种的重要食物来源,也是环境健康的生物指标。然而,对蜘蛛的研究却很少。鉴于蜘蛛的重要性,需要对用于确定蜘蛛多样性和丰度差异的蜘蛛调查方法进行比较,以了解其局限性和偏差。我们测试了一种利用柴油拖拉机空转产生的振动来吸引蜘蛛的新调查方法,并将其与传统的坑式诱捕法和夜间手工收集蜘蛛的方法进行了比较。在这三种调查方法中,共发现了 34 科 138 属 226 种 2294 只蜘蛛。夜间采集的蜘蛛物种多样性和丰富度明显高于其他两种方法(坑式捕集器采集蜘蛛和振动吸引蜘蛛)。就所需人力和材料成本而言,夜间收集法和振动法收集蜘蛛的效果非常相似。在所有已确认的蜘蛛种类中,80%是通过人工采集捕获的,30%是通过坑螨捕获器捕获的,30%是通过振动采集捕获的。坑式陷阱捕获的大多数蜘蛛物种都是已知的主要在地面栖息的物种,而树栖和地栖蜘蛛都是在夜间捕获的,这也是使用振动法吸引和收集蜘蛛的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Plasma Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin and Kidney Injury Molecule-1 in Small-Breed Dogs: A Retrospective Pilot Study Isolation of Aerobic Bacterial Species Associated with Palpable Udder Defects in Non-Dairy Ewes Amur Tiger Individual Identification Based on the Improved InceptionResNetV2 Identification of ActivinβA and Gonadotropin Regulation of the Activin System in the Ovary of Chinese Sturgeon Acipenser sinensis Reconstruction of the Quadriceps Extensor Mechanism with a Calcaneal Tendon–Bone Allograft in a Dog with a Resorbed Tibial Tuberosity Fracture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1