137Cs radiotracer in investigating influence of hillslope positions and land use on soil erosion and soil organic carbon stock—A case study in the Himalayan region

IF 5 3区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Use and Management Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1111/sum.13099
Anu David Raj, Suresh Kumar, Kuruppathusheril Radhakrishnan Sooryamol, Sankar Mariappan, Justin George Kalambukattu
{"title":"137Cs radiotracer in investigating influence of hillslope positions and land use on soil erosion and soil organic carbon stock—A case study in the Himalayan region","authors":"Anu David Raj, Suresh Kumar, Kuruppathusheril Radhakrishnan Sooryamol, Sankar Mariappan, Justin George Kalambukattu","doi":"10.1111/sum.13099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topography and land use/land cover (LULC) of the hillslope play a significant influence on soil erosion because of water, which is considered as a principal factor for the reduction of soil organic carbon content. Reliable information on the impact of erosion mechanism on soil organic carbon stock (SOCS) is essential for effectively accounting for the carbon flux that influences climate change. The main objectives of this study were to determine soil erosion based on the variation of <jats:sup>137</jats:sup>Cs (Radiocesium) radionuclide activity at various hillslope positions and LULC in a hilly and mountainous region of the north‐western Himalayas. Additionally, the relationship between <jats:sup>137</jats:sup>Cs concentration, soil erosion rate and SOCS were examined. Fallout radionuclide‐<jats:sup>137</jats:sup>Cs have emerged as a suitable method for assessing soil erosion in hilly and mountainous regions where rugged topography and extreme weather events restrain the conventional soil erosion assessment. The study revealed very high soil erosion rates of 32.89 and 30.70 t ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> year<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> in the lower hillslope positions with cultivated fields. The lowest soil erosion was obtained with a mean of 0.47 t ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> year<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> from the ridge with grassland, followed by the upper hillslope (5.50 t ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> year<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> under deodar forest and 14.07 t ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> year<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> under pine forest), and the middle hillslope (1.58 t ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> year<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for deodar and 7.77 t ha<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> year<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for pine forest). The soil erosion rates differ significantly between cultivated and forested regions, and there is also a significant difference between deodar and pine forests. Moreover, a significant difference was found between topographic positions concerning <jats:sup>137</jats:sup>Cs, SOCS and soil redistribution rate. This difference was more pronounced at hillslope positions with different LULC. In both disturbed (cultivated) (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = .111) and undisturbed (forested and grassland) (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = .356) soils, positive and statistically significant (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .005) poor relationships were found between SOCS and <jats:sup>137</jats:sup>Cs inventory. This indicates the presence of various factors influencing the soil organic carbon stock (SOCS) mechanism or the indirect contribution of soil erosion‐induced carbon loss. This suggests that forest cover can enhance SOCS in the soil, mitigating the adverse effects of soil erosion and climate change. Consequently, <jats:sup>137</jats:sup>Cs could be effectively used to quantify the SOC stock in soil redistribution over the hillslope affected by soil erosion. Statistical analyses indicated that the <jats:sup>137</jats:sup>Cs inventory, SOCS and erosion were significantly affected by various hillslope positions and LULC types.","PeriodicalId":21759,"journal":{"name":"Soil Use and Management","volume":"193 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Use and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topography and land use/land cover (LULC) of the hillslope play a significant influence on soil erosion because of water, which is considered as a principal factor for the reduction of soil organic carbon content. Reliable information on the impact of erosion mechanism on soil organic carbon stock (SOCS) is essential for effectively accounting for the carbon flux that influences climate change. The main objectives of this study were to determine soil erosion based on the variation of 137Cs (Radiocesium) radionuclide activity at various hillslope positions and LULC in a hilly and mountainous region of the north‐western Himalayas. Additionally, the relationship between 137Cs concentration, soil erosion rate and SOCS were examined. Fallout radionuclide‐137Cs have emerged as a suitable method for assessing soil erosion in hilly and mountainous regions where rugged topography and extreme weather events restrain the conventional soil erosion assessment. The study revealed very high soil erosion rates of 32.89 and 30.70 t ha−1 year−1 in the lower hillslope positions with cultivated fields. The lowest soil erosion was obtained with a mean of 0.47 t ha−1 year−1 from the ridge with grassland, followed by the upper hillslope (5.50 t ha−1 year−1 under deodar forest and 14.07 t ha−1 year−1 under pine forest), and the middle hillslope (1.58 t ha−1 year−1 for deodar and 7.77 t ha−1 year−1 for pine forest). The soil erosion rates differ significantly between cultivated and forested regions, and there is also a significant difference between deodar and pine forests. Moreover, a significant difference was found between topographic positions concerning 137Cs, SOCS and soil redistribution rate. This difference was more pronounced at hillslope positions with different LULC. In both disturbed (cultivated) (r2 = .111) and undisturbed (forested and grassland) (r2 = .356) soils, positive and statistically significant (p < .005) poor relationships were found between SOCS and 137Cs inventory. This indicates the presence of various factors influencing the soil organic carbon stock (SOCS) mechanism or the indirect contribution of soil erosion‐induced carbon loss. This suggests that forest cover can enhance SOCS in the soil, mitigating the adverse effects of soil erosion and climate change. Consequently, 137Cs could be effectively used to quantify the SOC stock in soil redistribution over the hillslope affected by soil erosion. Statistical analyses indicated that the 137Cs inventory, SOCS and erosion were significantly affected by various hillslope positions and LULC types.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
137Cs 放射性示踪剂在调查山坡位置和土地利用对土壤侵蚀和土壤有机碳储量影响中的应用--喜马拉雅地区的案例研究
山坡的地形和土地利用/土地覆盖(LULC)对水土流失有重要影响,而水土流失被认为是土壤有机碳含量减少的主要因素。关于侵蚀机制对土壤有机碳储量(SOCS)影响的可靠信息对于有效计算影响气候变化的碳通量至关重要。本研究的主要目的是根据喜马拉雅山西北部丘陵山区不同山坡位置和 LULC 的 137Cs(镭)放射性核素活性变化来确定土壤侵蚀情况。此外,还研究了 137Cs 浓度、土壤侵蚀率和 SOCS 之间的关系。在丘陵和山区,崎岖的地形和极端天气事件限制了传统的土壤侵蚀评估,而放射性核素 137Cs 则成为评估这些地区土壤侵蚀的合适方法。研究显示,在有耕地的山坡下部,土壤侵蚀率非常高,分别为每年 32.89 吨/公顷和 30.70 吨/公顷。草地山脊的土壤侵蚀率最低,平均为 0.47 吨/公顷-年-1,其次是山坡上部(杉树林下为 5.50 吨/公顷-年-1,松树林下为 14.07 吨/公顷-年-1)和山坡中部(杉树林下为 1.58 吨/公顷-年-1,松树林下为 7.77 吨/公顷-年-1)。水土流失率在耕地和林地之间存在显著差异,在杉木林和松树林之间也存在显著差异。此外,在 137Cs、SOCS 和土壤再分布率方面,地形位置之间也存在显著差异。这种差异在不同土地利用、土地利用变化(LULC)的山坡位置更为明显。在受扰动(耕作)土壤(r2 = .111)和未受扰动(森林和草地)土壤(r2 = .356)中,SOCS 和 137Cs 库存量之间均呈正相关,且具有显著的统计学意义(p < .005)。这表明存在各种影响土壤有机碳储量(SOCS)机制的因素,或土壤侵蚀引起的碳损失的间接贡献。这表明森林植被可以提高土壤中的有机碳储量,减轻土壤侵蚀和气候变化的不利影响。因此,137Cs 可以有效地量化受土壤侵蚀影响的山坡上土壤再分布中的 SOC 储量。统计分析表明,不同山坡位置和 LULC 类型对 137Cs 库存、SOCS 和水土流失有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Use and Management
Soil Use and Management 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
13.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Soil Use and Management publishes in soil science, earth and environmental science, agricultural science, and engineering fields. The submitted papers should consider the underlying mechanisms governing the natural and anthropogenic processes which affect soil systems, and should inform policy makers and/or practitioners on the sustainable use and management of soil resources. Interdisciplinary studies, e.g. linking soil with climate change, biodiversity, global health, and the UN’s sustainable development goals, with strong novelty, wide implications, and unexpected outcomes are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Phosphorus acquisition by faba bean, blue lupin, and chickpea in relation to soil phosphorus status Approaching soil health from a practitioner perspective – Placing practices before indicators for Australian cotton and other producers Soil carbon in the boreal region under climate and land use change Remediation of Pb, Cd, and Cu contaminated soil with Mg‐Fe‐Al layered double hydroxides (LDHs) synthesized from waste red mud Effects of unbalanced fertilizer use on system productivity and profitability under rice‐based cropping systems: Evidence from Eastern Gangetic Plain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1