Complete Dynamic Logic of Communicating Hybrid Programs

Marvin Brieger, Stefan Mitsch, André Platzer
{"title":"Complete Dynamic Logic of Communicating Hybrid Programs","authors":"Marvin Brieger, Stefan Mitsch, André Platzer","doi":"arxiv-2408.05012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a relatively complete proof calculus for the dynamic\nlogic of communicating hybrid programs dLCHP. Beyond traditional hybrid systems\nmixing discrete and continuous dynamics, communicating hybrid programs feature\nparallel interactions of hybrid systems. This not only compounds the subtleties\nof hybrid and parallel systems but adds the truly simultaneous synchronized\nevolution of parallel hybrid dynamics as a new challenge. To enable\ncompositional reasoning about communicating hybrid programs nevertheless, dLCHP\ncombines differential dynamic logic dL and assumption-commitment reasoning. To\nmaintain the logical essence of dynamic logic axiomatizations, dLCHP's proof\ncalculus presents a new modal logic view onto ac-reasoning. This modal view\ndrives a decomposition of classical monolithic proof rules for parallel systems\nreasoning into new modular axioms, which yields better flexibility and\nsimplifies soundness arguments. Adequacy of the proof calculus is shown by two\ncompleteness results: First, dLCHP is complete relative to the logic of\ncommunication traces and differential equation properties. This result proves\nthe new modular modal view sufficient for reasoning about parallel hybrid\nsystems, and captures modular strategies for reasoning about concrete parallel\nhybrid systems. The second result proof-theoretically aligns dLCHP and dL by\nproving that reasoning about parallel hybrid systems is exactly as hard as\nreasoning about hybrid systems, continuous systems, or discrete systems. This\ncompleteness result reveals the possibility of representational succinctness in\nparallel hybrid systems proofs.","PeriodicalId":501208,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.05012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a relatively complete proof calculus for the dynamic logic of communicating hybrid programs dLCHP. Beyond traditional hybrid systems mixing discrete and continuous dynamics, communicating hybrid programs feature parallel interactions of hybrid systems. This not only compounds the subtleties of hybrid and parallel systems but adds the truly simultaneous synchronized evolution of parallel hybrid dynamics as a new challenge. To enable compositional reasoning about communicating hybrid programs nevertheless, dLCHP combines differential dynamic logic dL and assumption-commitment reasoning. To maintain the logical essence of dynamic logic axiomatizations, dLCHP's proof calculus presents a new modal logic view onto ac-reasoning. This modal view drives a decomposition of classical monolithic proof rules for parallel systems reasoning into new modular axioms, which yields better flexibility and simplifies soundness arguments. Adequacy of the proof calculus is shown by two completeness results: First, dLCHP is complete relative to the logic of communication traces and differential equation properties. This result proves the new modular modal view sufficient for reasoning about parallel hybrid systems, and captures modular strategies for reasoning about concrete parallel hybrid systems. The second result proof-theoretically aligns dLCHP and dL by proving that reasoning about parallel hybrid systems is exactly as hard as reasoning about hybrid systems, continuous systems, or discrete systems. This completeness result reveals the possibility of representational succinctness in parallel hybrid systems proofs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合通信程序的完整动态逻辑
本文为通信混合程序的动态逻辑 dLCHP 提出了一个相对完整的证明微积分。除了传统的离散与连续混合动力学系统之外,通信混合程序还具有混合系统并行交互的特点。这不仅增加了混合系统和并行系统的微妙性,还增加了并行混合动力学的真正同步演化作为新的挑战。然而,为了实现对通信混合程序的组合推理,dLCHP 将微分动态逻辑 dL 和假设-承诺推理结合起来。为了保持动态逻辑公理化的逻辑本质,dLCHP 的证明计算器为 ac 推理提供了一种新的模态逻辑观点。这种模态观点将并行系统推理的经典单体证明规则分解为新的模块公理,从而获得了更好的灵活性,并简化了合理性论证。两个完备性结果表明了证明演算的完备性:首先,相对于通信轨迹逻辑和微分方程性质,dLCHP 是完备的。这一结果证明了足以推理并行混合系统的新模块模态观点,并捕捉到了推理具体并行混合系统的模块策略。第二个结果证明了并行混合系统的推理与混合系统、连续系统或离散系统的推理一样难,从而从理论上使 dLCHP 和 dL 相一致。这个完备性结果揭示了并行混合系统证明中表征简洁性的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Imperative Language for Verified Exact Real-Number Computation On Randomized Computational Models and Complexity Classes: a Historical Overview Computation and Complexity of Preference Inference Based on Hierarchical Models Stability Property for the Call-by-Value $λ$-calculus through Taylor Expansion Resource approximation for the $λμ$-calculus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1