Microbe surveillance in the amphibian pet trade: Results from a pilot study

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.4968
R. A. Pearhill, M. J. Gray, J. Jones, Z. Brinks, J. L. Brunner
{"title":"Microbe surveillance in the amphibian pet trade: Results from a pilot study","authors":"R. A. Pearhill,&nbsp;M. J. Gray,&nbsp;J. Jones,&nbsp;Z. Brinks,&nbsp;J. L. Brunner","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.4968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Regional and global trade of live animals can contribute to the spread and emergence of novel pathogens, including several important pathogens of amphibians. However, understanding the spread or even frequency of infections in large, complex amphibian trade networks has been difficult, in part because businesses tend to be reluctant to participate in surveillance programs. Thus, we developed a novel approach to surveillance in which anonymous participating businesses were sent surveillance kits through a trusted trade advocacy partner, samples were returned to researchers via anonymous prepaid envelopes, and results were provided via a secure website with access regulated by a unique personal identification number (PIN) created by the business. We tested samples for the amphibian pathogens, <i>Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans</i> (<i>Bsal</i>), <i>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis</i> (<i>Bd</i>), and <i>Ranavirus</i> spp. (<i>Rv</i>), as well as the beneficial microbe, <i>Janthinobacterium lividum</i> (<i>Jliv</i>), using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Out of 120 businesses invited to complete an anonymous socioeconomic survey, 24 volunteered to participate in pathogen surveillance, of which 14 were sent surveillance kits. Eight of these businesses returned samples consisting of swabs collected from amphibians in 78 terrestrial habitats and water filters from 49 aquatic habitats. Copies of a highly conserved vertebrate gene (EBF3N), quantified using qPCR, were consistently low (&lt;100 copies) in returned samples, but similar to those collected by researchers, indicating comparable sample quality. Three samples (from two facilities) had detectable levels of <i>Bd</i> DNA; <i>Bsal</i>, <i>Rv</i>, and <i>Jliv</i> were not detected. This pilot study provides evidence that information about pathogens in pet trade networks can be acquired by developing partnerships with industry, and business participation might be enhanced by ensuring anonymity and inclusion of a trade advocacy partner.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.4968","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regional and global trade of live animals can contribute to the spread and emergence of novel pathogens, including several important pathogens of amphibians. However, understanding the spread or even frequency of infections in large, complex amphibian trade networks has been difficult, in part because businesses tend to be reluctant to participate in surveillance programs. Thus, we developed a novel approach to surveillance in which anonymous participating businesses were sent surveillance kits through a trusted trade advocacy partner, samples were returned to researchers via anonymous prepaid envelopes, and results were provided via a secure website with access regulated by a unique personal identification number (PIN) created by the business. We tested samples for the amphibian pathogens, Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal), Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), and Ranavirus spp. (Rv), as well as the beneficial microbe, Janthinobacterium lividum (Jliv), using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Out of 120 businesses invited to complete an anonymous socioeconomic survey, 24 volunteered to participate in pathogen surveillance, of which 14 were sent surveillance kits. Eight of these businesses returned samples consisting of swabs collected from amphibians in 78 terrestrial habitats and water filters from 49 aquatic habitats. Copies of a highly conserved vertebrate gene (EBF3N), quantified using qPCR, were consistently low (<100 copies) in returned samples, but similar to those collected by researchers, indicating comparable sample quality. Three samples (from two facilities) had detectable levels of Bd DNA; Bsal, Rv, and Jliv were not detected. This pilot study provides evidence that information about pathogens in pet trade networks can be acquired by developing partnerships with industry, and business participation might be enhanced by ensuring anonymity and inclusion of a trade advocacy partner.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两栖动物宠物交易中的微生物监测:试点研究的结果
活体动物的区域和全球贸易可能会导致新型病原体的传播和出现,其中包括几种重要的两栖动物病原体。然而,要了解大型、复杂的两栖动物贸易网络中的传播甚至感染频率一直很困难,部分原因是企业往往不愿意参与监测计划。因此,我们开发了一种新颖的监测方法,即通过可信赖的贸易宣传合作伙伴向匿名参与企业发送监测工具包,通过匿名预付费信封将样本寄回研究人员,并通过一个安全网站提供结果,该网站的访问由企业创建的唯一个人识别码 (PIN) 监管。我们使用定量实时聚合酶链式反应 (qPCR) 对样本进行了两栖动物病原体 Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal)、Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) 和 Ranavirus spp. (Rv) 以及有益微生物 Janthinobacterium lividum (Jliv) 的检测。在受邀完成匿名社会经济调查的 120 家企业中,有 24 家企业自愿参与病原体监测,其中 14 家企业收到了监测工具包。其中 8 家企业交回了样本,包括从 78 个陆生栖息地的两栖动物身上采集的拭子和从 49 个水生栖息地的滤水器中采集的水样。使用 qPCR 对一种高度保守的脊椎动物基因(EBF3N)的拷贝数进行了定量,在返回的样本中,EBF3N 的拷贝数一直较低(100 拷贝),但与研究人员收集的样本相似,表明样本质量相当。有三个样本(来自两个机构)可检测到 Bd DNA;未检测到 Bsal、Rv 和 Jliv。这项试点研究提供了证据,证明可以通过与行业建立合作关系来获取宠物交易网络中的病原体信息,而通过确保匿名性和纳入行业宣传合作伙伴,可能会提高企业的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
Effect of cutting and burning on grassland habitat in Bardia National Park, Nepal Friend of the dead: Zoanthids enhance the persistence of dead coral reef framework under high consumer pressure Ventenata dubia projected to expand in the western United States despite future novel conditions Context-dependent directional effects of termite mounds on soil nutrients, vegetation communities, and mammalian foraging Hookworm prevalence in ocelots in Costa Rica is inconsistent with spillover from domestic dogs despite high overlap
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1