Static Load Testing with Elastic Cushion Layer: A Case Study in Foshan Highway Project

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1007/s12205-024-0159-8
Yunlong Yao, Xin Liu, Fenqiang Xu, Zhiwei Shao, Guisen Wang, Baoning Hong
{"title":"Static Load Testing with Elastic Cushion Layer: A Case Study in Foshan Highway Project","authors":"Yunlong Yao, Xin Liu, Fenqiang Xu, Zhiwei Shao, Guisen Wang, Baoning Hong","doi":"10.1007/s12205-024-0159-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To address limitations in conventional static load tests for composite foundations, a method utilizing an elastic cushion layer is proposed to accurately simulate subgrade behavior, focusing on a highway project in Guangdong Province. Initial finite element calculations justify the elastic cushion layer introduction. Functional correlations are established between the stab deformation of the piles and the thickness, modulus and the pile-soil stress ratio. The reasonable value of the elastic modulus is taken as 4–10 MPa when the elastic cushion layer thickness is 60 mm. Lab and field tests of cement fly-ash gravel (CFG) pile composite foundations assess settlement variations and pile-soil stress ratios from the proposed improvements. Results reveal the superior performance of the elastic cushion layer over the sand cushion layer, effectively mimicking embankment subgrade layers and reducing rigid constraints on the loading plate. The elastic cushion layer exhibits a significant stress-regulating effect, allowing the transition from the original “100–150 mm sand cushion layer + loading plate” to “less than 100 mm sand cushion layer + 60 mm elastic cushion layer (8 MPa) + loading plate”. This adjustment enhances the practical role of the subgrade in the composite foundation, improving the accuracy and feasibility of static load testing methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-0159-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address limitations in conventional static load tests for composite foundations, a method utilizing an elastic cushion layer is proposed to accurately simulate subgrade behavior, focusing on a highway project in Guangdong Province. Initial finite element calculations justify the elastic cushion layer introduction. Functional correlations are established between the stab deformation of the piles and the thickness, modulus and the pile-soil stress ratio. The reasonable value of the elastic modulus is taken as 4–10 MPa when the elastic cushion layer thickness is 60 mm. Lab and field tests of cement fly-ash gravel (CFG) pile composite foundations assess settlement variations and pile-soil stress ratios from the proposed improvements. Results reveal the superior performance of the elastic cushion layer over the sand cushion layer, effectively mimicking embankment subgrade layers and reducing rigid constraints on the loading plate. The elastic cushion layer exhibits a significant stress-regulating effect, allowing the transition from the original “100–150 mm sand cushion layer + loading plate” to “less than 100 mm sand cushion layer + 60 mm elastic cushion layer (8 MPa) + loading plate”. This adjustment enhances the practical role of the subgrade in the composite foundation, improving the accuracy and feasibility of static load testing methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带弹性缓冲层的静载荷测试:佛山高速公路项目案例研究
针对复合地基传统静载荷试验的局限性,我们提出了一种利用弹性垫层来精确模拟路基行为的方法,并将重点放在广东省的一个高速公路项目上。初步的有限元计算证明了引入弹性缓冲层的合理性。建立了桩的稳定变形与厚度、模量和桩土应力比之间的函数关系。当弹性垫层厚度为 60 毫米时,弹性模量的合理值为 4-10 兆帕。对水泥粉煤灰砾石(CFG)桩复合地基进行的实验室和现场测试评估了建议改进后的沉降变化和桩土应力比。结果表明,弹性垫层的性能优于砂垫层,能有效模拟路堤基层,减少对加载板的刚性约束。弹性垫层具有显著的应力调节作用,可从原来的 "100-150 毫米砂垫层+加载板 "过渡到 "小于 100 毫米砂垫层+60 毫米弹性垫层(8 兆帕)+加载板"。这一调整增强了基层在复合地基中的实际作用,提高了静载荷试验方法的准确性和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1