Creating a postgraduate syllabus for a team care diploma examination: a Delphi study

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002008
Adil Iqbal, Zhi Zhao, William van Klaveren, Mohammed Elbashir, Adam Moxon, Jonathan Houghton, Jim Kerss, Natasha Jones, Katherine Rose Marino, Jonathan Power, Huw Roberts, Rosalyn Cooke, Sarah Astill, Camilla Nykjaer, Dane Vishnubala
{"title":"Creating a postgraduate syllabus for a team care diploma examination: a Delphi study","authors":"Adil Iqbal, Zhi Zhao, William van Klaveren, Mohammed Elbashir, Adam Moxon, Jonathan Houghton, Jim Kerss, Natasha Jones, Katherine Rose Marino, Jonathan Power, Huw Roberts, Rosalyn Cooke, Sarah Astill, Camilla Nykjaer, Dane Vishnubala","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives There is no agreed standard assessment of the minimum knowledge and skills that are required to provide healthcare to participants in individual or team sports. This study aims to develop a syllabus for the Faculty of Sport and Exercise Medicine (FSEM) Team Care Diploma examination. This will provide a recognised assessment of the minimum required skills and knowledge for healthcare professionals providing care in an individual and team sport environment. Methods A modified Delphi approach was used. A syllabus was developed by a purposeful selection of members of the FSEM, all of whom have significant team care experience. This was then reviewed by the Delphi expert panel who were team care practitioners with at least 5 years of experience. A two-round Delphi approach was used to develop a consensus. Results The expert panel consisted of 50 individuals, with 46 (92%) completing both rounds. Of the 447 learning objectives (LOs) proposed; 430 (96%) were accepted outright, 17 (4%) were rejected and four new LOs were introduced based on expert panel feedback. The final syllabus contained 434 LOs across 6 modules (clinical governance, safe and effective practice, interdisciplinary teamwork, specific athlete groups, specific health conditions and duties of the medical team). Conclusion This standardised syllabus will be used as the basis for the new FSEM Team Care Diploma examination which will aim to provide world-leading standardised assessment of the minimum skills and knowledge required for healthcare professionals across the multidisciplinary team providing care in individual and team sport. Data are available on reasonable request. Anonymised data are available on request.","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives There is no agreed standard assessment of the minimum knowledge and skills that are required to provide healthcare to participants in individual or team sports. This study aims to develop a syllabus for the Faculty of Sport and Exercise Medicine (FSEM) Team Care Diploma examination. This will provide a recognised assessment of the minimum required skills and knowledge for healthcare professionals providing care in an individual and team sport environment. Methods A modified Delphi approach was used. A syllabus was developed by a purposeful selection of members of the FSEM, all of whom have significant team care experience. This was then reviewed by the Delphi expert panel who were team care practitioners with at least 5 years of experience. A two-round Delphi approach was used to develop a consensus. Results The expert panel consisted of 50 individuals, with 46 (92%) completing both rounds. Of the 447 learning objectives (LOs) proposed; 430 (96%) were accepted outright, 17 (4%) were rejected and four new LOs were introduced based on expert panel feedback. The final syllabus contained 434 LOs across 6 modules (clinical governance, safe and effective practice, interdisciplinary teamwork, specific athlete groups, specific health conditions and duties of the medical team). Conclusion This standardised syllabus will be used as the basis for the new FSEM Team Care Diploma examination which will aim to provide world-leading standardised assessment of the minimum skills and knowledge required for healthcare professionals across the multidisciplinary team providing care in individual and team sport. Data are available on reasonable request. Anonymised data are available on request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为团队护理文凭考试制定研究生教学大纲:德尔菲研究
目标 对于为个人或团队运动参与者提供医疗保健所需的最低知识和技能,目前尚无一致认可的标准评估。本研究旨在为运动与锻炼医学系(FSEM)团队护理文凭考试制定一个教学大纲。这将为在个人和团队运动环境中提供医疗保健服务的医疗保健专业人员所需的最低技能和知识提供公认的评估。方法 采用改良德尔菲法。有目的性地选择 FSEM 的成员制定了教学大纲,这些成员都具有丰富的团队护理经验。然后由德尔菲专家小组进行审查,专家小组成员都是至少有 5 年经验的团队护理从业人员。专家组采用两轮德尔菲法达成共识。结果 专家小组由 50 人组成,其中 46 人(92%)完成了两轮评审。在提出的 447 个学习目标(LO)中,430 个(96%)被完全接受,17 个(4%)被否决,4 个新的学习目标是根据专家组的反馈意见提出的。最终的教学大纲包含 6 个模块(临床管理、安全有效的实践、跨学科团队合作、特定运动员群体、特定健康状况和医疗团队的职责)的 434 个学习目标。结论 本标准化教学大纲将作为新的 FSEM 团队护理文凭考试的基础,其目的是对在个人和团队运动中提供护理的多学科团队中的医疗保健专业人员所需的最低技能和知识进行世界领先的标准化评估。如有合理要求,可提供数据。匿名数据可应要求提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cardiac health in breast cancer (CHiB): protocol for a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. It's about timing: how density can benefit future research on the optimal dosage of acute physical exercise breaks in esports. 24-hour Movement Behaviour study-Lithuanian protocol: a comprehensive overview of behaviours and health outcomes in adolescents. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic exercise versus myofascial trigger point therapy in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathies: a randomised controlled trial. Correction: Differences in the technical performance of heading between men and women football players during FIFA World Cup 2022 and FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 matches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1