From Program Logics to Language Logics

Matteo Cimini
{"title":"From Program Logics to Language Logics","authors":"Matteo Cimini","doi":"arxiv-2408.01515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Program logics are a powerful formal method in the context of program\nverification. Can we develop a counterpart of program logics in the context of\nlanguage verification? This paper proposes language logics, which allow for\nstatements of the form $\\{P\\}\\ \\mathcal{X}\\ \\{Q\\}$ where $\\mathcal{X}$, the\nsubject of analysis, can be a language component such as a piece of grammar, a\ntyping rule, a reduction rule or other parts of a language definition. To\ndemonstrate our approach, we develop $\\mathbb{L}$, a language logic that can be\nused to analyze language definitions on various aspects of language design. We\nillustrate $\\mathbb{L}$ to the analysis of some selected aspects of a\nprogramming language. We have also implemented an automated prover for\n$\\mathbb{L}$, and we confirm that the tool repeats these analyses. Ultimately,\n$\\mathbb{L}$ cannot verify languages. Nonetheless, we believe that this paper\nprovides a strong first step towards adopting the methods of program logics for\nthe analysis of languages.","PeriodicalId":501197,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Programming Languages","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Programming Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.01515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Program logics are a powerful formal method in the context of program verification. Can we develop a counterpart of program logics in the context of language verification? This paper proposes language logics, which allow for statements of the form $\{P\}\ \mathcal{X}\ \{Q\}$ where $\mathcal{X}$, the subject of analysis, can be a language component such as a piece of grammar, a typing rule, a reduction rule or other parts of a language definition. To demonstrate our approach, we develop $\mathbb{L}$, a language logic that can be used to analyze language definitions on various aspects of language design. We illustrate $\mathbb{L}$ to the analysis of some selected aspects of a programming language. We have also implemented an automated prover for $\mathbb{L}$, and we confirm that the tool repeats these analyses. Ultimately, $\mathbb{L}$ cannot verify languages. Nonetheless, we believe that this paper provides a strong first step towards adopting the methods of program logics for the analysis of languages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从程序逻辑到语言逻辑
在程序验证中,程序逻辑是一种强大的形式化方法。我们能否在语言验证中发展出与程序逻辑相对应的呢?本文提出了语言逻辑,它允许以 $\{P\}\mathcal{X}}\{Q\}$ 的形式陈述,其中 $\mathcal{X}$ 作为分析对象,可以是一个语言组件,如语法片段、分类规则、还原规则或语言定义的其他部分。为了演示我们的方法,我们开发了$\mathbb{L}$,这是一种语言逻辑,可以用来分析语言设计中各个方面的语言定义。我们将 $\mathbb{L}$ 用于分析编程语言的某些选定方面。我们还实现了$\mathbb{L}$的自动求证器,并确认该工具可以重复这些分析。最终,$\mathbb{L}$ 无法验证语言。尽管如此,我们相信本文为采用程序逻辑方法分析语言迈出了坚实的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Repr Types: One Abstraction to Rule Them All $μλεδ$-Calculus: A Self Optimizing Language that Seems to Exhibit Paradoxical Transfinite Cognitive Capabilities Expressing and Analyzing Quantum Algorithms with Qualtran Conversational Concurrency The MLIR Transform Dialect. Your compiler is more powerful than you think
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1