Marc Gonzalez Capdevila , Karine Aparecida Pistili Rodrigues , Tales Augusto Sartório Furlan , Toni Granollers
{"title":"Quantifying heuristic evaluation","authors":"Marc Gonzalez Capdevila , Karine Aparecida Pistili Rodrigues , Tales Augusto Sartório Furlan , Toni Granollers","doi":"10.1016/j.csi.2024.103891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since Nielsen presented his work on heuristic evaluation in the 90s, it has been seen how this inspection method has been used recurrently not only in academia but also in the industry. The benefits of their application have been studied widely and multiple heuristics for multiple purposes have been designed. Despite it, quantifying their qualitative nature has been challenging. This research presents a novel approach to provide a framework for quantifying an heuristic evaluation based on the calculus of what we called Usability Percentage. We have used an initial study that started in 2018 with 7 different evaluators and we presented a new methodology to calculate the aforementioned percentage and also provide multiple information that might be added into a final report. We have used the platform RUXAILAB that allows us to create heuristic evaluations to prepare and execute the test. Our findings are that by comparing both studies the new methodology presents a narrowed data distribution through the different evaluators and allows us to identify in a more precise and concise way which heuristics might fail in an evaluation test.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50635,"journal":{"name":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 103891"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Standards & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920548924000606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since Nielsen presented his work on heuristic evaluation in the 90s, it has been seen how this inspection method has been used recurrently not only in academia but also in the industry. The benefits of their application have been studied widely and multiple heuristics for multiple purposes have been designed. Despite it, quantifying their qualitative nature has been challenging. This research presents a novel approach to provide a framework for quantifying an heuristic evaluation based on the calculus of what we called Usability Percentage. We have used an initial study that started in 2018 with 7 different evaluators and we presented a new methodology to calculate the aforementioned percentage and also provide multiple information that might be added into a final report. We have used the platform RUXAILAB that allows us to create heuristic evaluations to prepare and execute the test. Our findings are that by comparing both studies the new methodology presents a narrowed data distribution through the different evaluators and allows us to identify in a more precise and concise way which heuristics might fail in an evaluation test.
期刊介绍:
The quality of software, well-defined interfaces (hardware and software), the process of digitalisation, and accepted standards in these fields are essential for building and exploiting complex computing, communication, multimedia and measuring systems. Standards can simplify the design and construction of individual hardware and software components and help to ensure satisfactory interworking.
Computer Standards & Interfaces is an international journal dealing specifically with these topics.
The journal
• Provides information about activities and progress on the definition of computer standards, software quality, interfaces and methods, at national, European and international levels
• Publishes critical comments on standards and standards activities
• Disseminates user''s experiences and case studies in the application and exploitation of established or emerging standards, interfaces and methods
• Offers a forum for discussion on actual projects, standards, interfaces and methods by recognised experts
• Stimulates relevant research by providing a specialised refereed medium.