Improving Tuberculosis Detection in Chest X-ray Images through Transfer Learning and Deep Learning: A Comparative Study of CNN Architectures

Alex Mirugwe, Lillian Tamale, Juwa Nyirenda
{"title":"Improving Tuberculosis Detection in Chest X-ray Images through Transfer Learning and Deep Learning: A Comparative Study of CNN Architectures","authors":"Alex Mirugwe, Lillian Tamale, Juwa Nyirenda","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.02.24311396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Tuberculosis remains a significant global health challenge, necessitating more efficient and accurate diagnostic methods.\nMethods: This study evaluates the performance of various convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, ResNet101, ResNet152, and Inception-ResNet-V2 in classifying chest X-ray (CXR) images as either normal or TB positive. The dataset comprised 4,200 CXR images, with 700 labeled as TB-positive and 3,500 as normal. We also examined the impact of data augmentation on model performance and analyzed the training times and the number of parameters for each architecture.\nResults: Our results showed that VGG16 outperformed the other models across all evaluation metrics, achieving an accuracy of 99.4%, precision of 97.9%, recall of 98.6%, F1-score of 98.3%, and AUC-ROC of 98.25%. Surprisingly, data augmentation did not improve performance, suggesting that the original dataset's diversity was sufficient. Furthermore, models with large numbers of parameters, such as ResNet152 and Inception-ResNet-V2, required longer training times without yielding proportionally better performance.\nDiscussion: These findings highlight the importance of selecting the appropriate model architecture based on task-specific requirements. While more complex models with larger parameter counts may seem advantageous, they do not necessarily offer superior performance and often come with increased computational costs.\nConclusion: The study demonstrates the potential of simpler models such as VGG16 to effectively diagnose TB from CXR images, providing a balance between performance and computational efficiency. This insight can guide future research and practical implementations in medical image classification.","PeriodicalId":501358,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.02.24311396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tuberculosis remains a significant global health challenge, necessitating more efficient and accurate diagnostic methods. Methods: This study evaluates the performance of various convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, ResNet101, ResNet152, and Inception-ResNet-V2 in classifying chest X-ray (CXR) images as either normal or TB positive. The dataset comprised 4,200 CXR images, with 700 labeled as TB-positive and 3,500 as normal. We also examined the impact of data augmentation on model performance and analyzed the training times and the number of parameters for each architecture. Results: Our results showed that VGG16 outperformed the other models across all evaluation metrics, achieving an accuracy of 99.4%, precision of 97.9%, recall of 98.6%, F1-score of 98.3%, and AUC-ROC of 98.25%. Surprisingly, data augmentation did not improve performance, suggesting that the original dataset's diversity was sufficient. Furthermore, models with large numbers of parameters, such as ResNet152 and Inception-ResNet-V2, required longer training times without yielding proportionally better performance. Discussion: These findings highlight the importance of selecting the appropriate model architecture based on task-specific requirements. While more complex models with larger parameter counts may seem advantageous, they do not necessarily offer superior performance and often come with increased computational costs. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the potential of simpler models such as VGG16 to effectively diagnose TB from CXR images, providing a balance between performance and computational efficiency. This insight can guide future research and practical implementations in medical image classification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过迁移学习和深度学习改进胸部 X 光图像中的结核病检测:CNN 架构比较研究
简介:结核病仍然是全球健康的重大挑战:结核病仍然是全球健康面临的重大挑战,需要更高效、更准确的诊断方法:本研究评估了各种卷积神经网络(CNN)架构 VGG16、VGG19、ResNet50、ResNet101、ResNet152 和 Inception-ResNet-V2 在将胸部 X 光(CXR)图像分类为正常或肺结核阳性方面的性能。数据集包括 4,200 张 CXR 图像,其中 700 张标记为肺结核阳性,3,500 张标记为正常。我们还研究了数据增强对模型性能的影响,并分析了每种架构的训练时间和参数数量:结果显示,VGG16 在所有评估指标上都优于其他模型,准确率达到 99.4%,精确率达到 97.9%,召回率达到 98.6%,F1 分数达到 98.3%,AUC-ROC 达到 98.25%。令人惊讶的是,数据扩充并没有提高性能,这表明原始数据集的多样性已经足够。此外,具有大量参数的模型,如 ResNet152 和 Inception-ResNet-V2 需要更长的训练时间,但性能却没有相应提高:讨论:这些发现强调了根据特定任务要求选择适当模型架构的重要性。虽然参数数越多的复杂模型似乎越有利,但它们并不一定能提供更优越的性能,而且往往会增加计算成本:这项研究表明,VGG16 等较简单的模型具有通过 CXR 图像有效诊断肺结核的潜力,可在性能和计算效率之间取得平衡。这一见解可以指导未来医学图像分类的研究和实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auto-segmentation of hemi-diaphragms in free-breathing dynamic MRI of pediatric subjects with thoracic insufficiency syndrome Dynamic MR of muscle contraction during electrical muscle stimulation as a potential diagnostic tool for neuromuscular disease Deriving Imaging Biomarkers for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Using Deep Learning Exploring subthreshold functional network alterations in women with phenylketonuria by higher criticism Beyond Algorithms: The Impact of Simplified CNN Models and Multifactorial Influences on Radiological Image Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1