{"title":"Forecasting the architecture billings index (ABI) using machine learning predictive models","authors":"Sooin Kim, Atefe Makhmalbaf, Mohsen Shahandashti","doi":"10.1108/ecam-06-2023-0544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This research aims to forecast the ABI as a leading indicator of U.S. construction activities, applying multivariate machine learning predictive models over different horizons and utilizing the nonlinear and long-term dependencies between the ABI and macroeconomic and construction market variables. To assess the applicability of the machine learning models, six multivariate machine learning predictive models were developed considering the relationships between the ABI and other construction market and macroeconomic variables. The forecasting performances of the developed predictive models were evaluated in different forecasting scenarios, such as short-term, medium-term, and long-term horizons comparable to the actual timelines of construction projects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The architecture billings index (ABI) as a macroeconomic indicator is published monthly by the American Institute of Architects (AIA) to evaluate business conditions and track construction market movements. The current research developed multivariate machine learning models to forecast ABI data for different time horizons. Different macroeconomic and construction market variables, including Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Total Nonresidential Construction Spending, Project Inquiries, and Design Contracts data were considered for predicting future ABI values. The forecasting accuracies of the machine learning models were validated and compared using the short-term (one-year-ahead), medium-term (three-year-ahead), and long-term (five-year-ahead) ABI testing datasets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The experimental results show that Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) provides the highest accuracy among the machine learning and traditional time-series forecasting models such as Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) or seasonal ARIMA in forecasting the ABIs over all the forecasting horizons. This is because of the strengths of LSTM for forecasting temporal time series by solving vanishing or exploding gradient problems and learning long-term dependencies in sequential ABI time series. The findings of this research highlight the applicability of machine learning predictive models for forecasting the ABI as a leading indicator of construction activities, business conditions, and market movements.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry practitioners, investment groups, media outlets, and business leaders refer to ABI as a macroeconomic indicator to evaluate business conditions and track construction market movements. It is crucial to forecast the ABI accurately for strategic planning and preemptive risk management in fluctuating AEC business cycles. For example, cost estimators and engineers who forecast the ABI to predict future demand for architectural services and construction activities can prepare and price their bids more strategically to avoid a bid loss or profit loss.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The ABI data have been forecasted and modeled using linear time series models. However, linear time series models often fail to capture nonlinear patterns, interactions, and dependencies among variables, which can be handled by machine learning models in a more flexible manner. Despite the strength of machine learning models to capture nonlinear patterns and relationships between variables, the applicability and forecasting performance of multivariate machine learning models have not been investigated for ABI forecasting problems. This research first attempted to forecast ABI data for different time horizons using multivariate machine learning predictive models using different macroeconomic and construction market variables.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":11888,"journal":{"name":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-06-2023-0544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This research aims to forecast the ABI as a leading indicator of U.S. construction activities, applying multivariate machine learning predictive models over different horizons and utilizing the nonlinear and long-term dependencies between the ABI and macroeconomic and construction market variables. To assess the applicability of the machine learning models, six multivariate machine learning predictive models were developed considering the relationships between the ABI and other construction market and macroeconomic variables. The forecasting performances of the developed predictive models were evaluated in different forecasting scenarios, such as short-term, medium-term, and long-term horizons comparable to the actual timelines of construction projects.
Design/methodology/approach
The architecture billings index (ABI) as a macroeconomic indicator is published monthly by the American Institute of Architects (AIA) to evaluate business conditions and track construction market movements. The current research developed multivariate machine learning models to forecast ABI data for different time horizons. Different macroeconomic and construction market variables, including Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Total Nonresidential Construction Spending, Project Inquiries, and Design Contracts data were considered for predicting future ABI values. The forecasting accuracies of the machine learning models were validated and compared using the short-term (one-year-ahead), medium-term (three-year-ahead), and long-term (five-year-ahead) ABI testing datasets.
Findings
The experimental results show that Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) provides the highest accuracy among the machine learning and traditional time-series forecasting models such as Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) or seasonal ARIMA in forecasting the ABIs over all the forecasting horizons. This is because of the strengths of LSTM for forecasting temporal time series by solving vanishing or exploding gradient problems and learning long-term dependencies in sequential ABI time series. The findings of this research highlight the applicability of machine learning predictive models for forecasting the ABI as a leading indicator of construction activities, business conditions, and market movements.
Practical implications
The architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry practitioners, investment groups, media outlets, and business leaders refer to ABI as a macroeconomic indicator to evaluate business conditions and track construction market movements. It is crucial to forecast the ABI accurately for strategic planning and preemptive risk management in fluctuating AEC business cycles. For example, cost estimators and engineers who forecast the ABI to predict future demand for architectural services and construction activities can prepare and price their bids more strategically to avoid a bid loss or profit loss.
Originality/value
The ABI data have been forecasted and modeled using linear time series models. However, linear time series models often fail to capture nonlinear patterns, interactions, and dependencies among variables, which can be handled by machine learning models in a more flexible manner. Despite the strength of machine learning models to capture nonlinear patterns and relationships between variables, the applicability and forecasting performance of multivariate machine learning models have not been investigated for ABI forecasting problems. This research first attempted to forecast ABI data for different time horizons using multivariate machine learning predictive models using different macroeconomic and construction market variables.
目的 本研究旨在预测作为美国建筑活动先行指标的美国建筑业指数,在不同视角下应用多元机器学习预测模型,并利用美国建筑业指数与宏观经济和建筑市场变量之间的非线性和长期依赖关系。为了评估机器学习模型的适用性,考虑到 ABI 与其他建筑市场和宏观经济变量之间的关系,开发了六个多元机器学习预测模型。在不同的预测情景下,如与建筑项目实际时间线相当的短期、中期和长期预测情景下,对所开发预测模型的预测性能进行了评估。 设计/方法/方法美国建筑师协会(AIA)每月发布作为宏观经济指标的建筑开票指数(ABI),以评估商业状况并跟踪建筑市场的动向。目前的研究开发了多元机器学习模型来预测不同时间跨度的 ABI 数据。在预测未来 ABI 值时,考虑了不同的宏观经济和建筑市场变量,包括国内生产总值 (GDP)、非住宅建筑总支出、项目咨询和设计合同数据。实验结果表明,在机器学习和传统的时间序列预测模型(如矢量误差修正模型或季节性自回归回归移动平均模型)中,长短期记忆(LSTM)在预测所有预测视角的 ABIs 时提供了最高的准确率。这是因为 LSTM 通过解决消失或爆炸梯度问题以及学习连续 ABI 时间序列中的长期依赖关系,具有预测时间序列的优势。实际意义建筑、工程和施工(AEC)行业的从业人员、投资团体、媒体机构和商业领袖将 ABI 作为宏观经济指标,用于评估商业状况和跟踪建筑市场动向。在波动的 AEC 商业周期中,准确预测 ABI 对于战略规划和预先风险管理至关重要。例如,成本估算师和工程师通过预测 ABI 来预测未来对建筑服务和建筑活动的需求,可以更有策略地准备和定价投标,避免投标失利或利润损失。然而,线性时间序列模型往往无法捕捉变量之间的非线性模式、相互作用和依赖关系,而机器学习模型可以更灵活地处理这些问题。尽管机器学习模型可以捕捉变量之间的非线性模式和关系,但对于 ABI 预测问题,多元机器学习模型的适用性和预测性能尚未得到研究。本研究首先尝试使用多元机器学习预测模型,利用不同的宏观经济和建筑市场变量对不同时间跨度的 ABI 数据进行预测。
期刊介绍:
ECAM publishes original peer-reviewed research papers, case studies, technical notes, book reviews, features, discussions and other contemporary articles that advance research and practice in engineering, construction and architectural management. In particular, ECAM seeks to advance integrated design and construction practices, project lifecycle management, and sustainable construction. The journal’s scope covers all aspects of architectural design, design management, construction/project management, engineering management of major infrastructure projects, and the operation and management of constructed facilities. ECAM also addresses the technological, process, economic/business, environmental/sustainability, political, and social/human developments that influence the construction project delivery process.
ECAM strives to establish strong theoretical and empirical debates in the above areas of engineering, architecture, and construction research. Papers should be heavily integrated with the existing and current body of knowledge within the field and develop explicit and novel contributions. Acknowledging the global character of the field, we welcome papers on regional studies but encourage authors to position the work within the broader international context by reviewing and comparing findings from their regional study with studies conducted in other regions or countries whenever possible.