{"title":"Academic achievement in the financial accounting course: COVID19 impact within the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging (DEIB) framework","authors":"Oksana Kim, Robert E. Rosacker","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines student performance in the principles of financial accounting course at a comprehensive, AACSB accredited, midwestern University to assess several issues raised and being directly addressed through a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) initiative. It is framed within a high-quality, archival dataset constructed by the University to support data analytic, evidence-based decisions, to inform student initiatives aimed at closing educational opportunity gaps. The examined course is the only business course supported by a supplemental instruction program that targets traditionally difficult University courses (failure rates exceeding 25%). Our empirical analysis is conducted within the context of pre- and post-COVID19 timeframes with this disruption deemed as a moderating factor. Final course grades, gender identification, academic major, race, and international student status were examined to investigate grade performance differences, if any, between the two timeframes, while concentrating on distinct DEIB population demographics. We find that students of color and female students underperformed in the core accounting course, which impedes their progress towards the chosen major. No evidence was found for an academic achievement difference based on the international student status. In addition, first-generation students’ performance does not differ from that of their peers, despite ongoing concerns of lack of confidence and resources this cohort possesses. Last, female students’ performance improved post- pandemic, while other minority groups did not experience any changes in course success rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines student performance in the principles of financial accounting course at a comprehensive, AACSB accredited, midwestern University to assess several issues raised and being directly addressed through a Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) initiative. It is framed within a high-quality, archival dataset constructed by the University to support data analytic, evidence-based decisions, to inform student initiatives aimed at closing educational opportunity gaps. The examined course is the only business course supported by a supplemental instruction program that targets traditionally difficult University courses (failure rates exceeding 25%). Our empirical analysis is conducted within the context of pre- and post-COVID19 timeframes with this disruption deemed as a moderating factor. Final course grades, gender identification, academic major, race, and international student status were examined to investigate grade performance differences, if any, between the two timeframes, while concentrating on distinct DEIB population demographics. We find that students of color and female students underperformed in the core accounting course, which impedes their progress towards the chosen major. No evidence was found for an academic achievement difference based on the international student status. In addition, first-generation students’ performance does not differ from that of their peers, despite ongoing concerns of lack of confidence and resources this cohort possesses. Last, female students’ performance improved post- pandemic, while other minority groups did not experience any changes in course success rates.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.