Janine Hoffmann, Theresa M. Schütze, Annika Kolodziejczyk, Annekathrin Kränkel, Susanne Reinhardt, Razvan P. Derihaci, Cahit Birdir, Pauline Wimberger, Haruhiko Koseki, Mareike Albert
{"title":"Canonical and non-canonical PRC1 differentially contribute to the regulation of neural stem cell fate","authors":"Janine Hoffmann, Theresa M. Schütze, Annika Kolodziejczyk, Annekathrin Kränkel, Susanne Reinhardt, Razvan P. Derihaci, Cahit Birdir, Pauline Wimberger, Haruhiko Koseki, Mareike Albert","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.07.606990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neocortex development is characterized by sequential phases of neural progenitor cell (NPC) expansion, neurogenesis and gliogenesis. Polycomb-mediated epigenetic mechanisms are known to play important roles in regulating the lineage potential of NPCs during development. The composition of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) is highly diverse in mammals and was hypothesized to contribute to context-specific regulation of cell fate. Here, we have performed side-by-side comparison of the role of canonical PRC1.2/1.4 and non-canonical PRC1.3/1.5, all of which are expressed in the developing neocortex, in NSC proliferation and differentiation. We found that the deletion of <em>Pcgf2/4</em> in NSCs led to a strong reduction in proliferation and to altered lineage fate, both during the neurogenic and gliogenic phase, whereas <em>Pcgf3/5</em> played a minor role. Mechanistically, genes encoding stem cell and neurogenic factors were bound by PRC1 and differentially expressed upon <em>Pcgf2/4</em> deletion. Thus, rather than different PRC1 sub-complexes contributing to different phases of neural development, we found that canonical PRC1 played a more significant role in NSC regulation during proliferative, neurogenic and gliogenic phases compared to non-canonical PRC1.","PeriodicalId":501269,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Developmental Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Developmental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.07.606990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Neocortex development is characterized by sequential phases of neural progenitor cell (NPC) expansion, neurogenesis and gliogenesis. Polycomb-mediated epigenetic mechanisms are known to play important roles in regulating the lineage potential of NPCs during development. The composition of Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) is highly diverse in mammals and was hypothesized to contribute to context-specific regulation of cell fate. Here, we have performed side-by-side comparison of the role of canonical PRC1.2/1.4 and non-canonical PRC1.3/1.5, all of which are expressed in the developing neocortex, in NSC proliferation and differentiation. We found that the deletion of Pcgf2/4 in NSCs led to a strong reduction in proliferation and to altered lineage fate, both during the neurogenic and gliogenic phase, whereas Pcgf3/5 played a minor role. Mechanistically, genes encoding stem cell and neurogenic factors were bound by PRC1 and differentially expressed upon Pcgf2/4 deletion. Thus, rather than different PRC1 sub-complexes contributing to different phases of neural development, we found that canonical PRC1 played a more significant role in NSC regulation during proliferative, neurogenic and gliogenic phases compared to non-canonical PRC1.